Two Maulings in One Day - Paxman AND Channel 4

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lateralthinking1

    Well, we all have different opinions on people handsomefortune. I too am for mild manners and modesty but Bamber didn't really epitomise those traits for me. His style was more like 'two brains' David Willetts and I think you might find he belonged to ITV.

    I fully agree with Jean when she refers to Ann Leslie as a 'character'. That is another category of people I tend to like. Views that I would normally find unpalatable are quite ok with me if they emanate from characters, particularly if they have some personality. Why else be entertained by, say, David Starkey? It helps of course if they are relatively harmless in themselves and have equally feisty opponents. Even MPs have their egg and chips in the company of those whose views are different from their own.

    I thought the Ann Leslie pieces were quite helpful for introducing a few shades into the black and white arguments. When asked in the clip if she were a feminist, her answer was 'it depends'. She has quite contradictory thoughts which I find interesting. She is adept at pointing out the weaknesses in many men but also argues that she as a professional woman has stood up to their strengths. She thinks that women need to choose between family and profession unless they can afford to do otherwise. She believes in equal mortgage rights but not equal top pay. She is less critical of certain kinds of women than the feminist Tanya Gold even though it is the latter who would promote the idea of 'sisterhood'. And she gets on well with an essentially likeable, knowledgeable and insightful ex Trot who for reasons presumably only known to himself has recently sold his soul to Sky Arts.

    I think Leslie is completely wrong in many of her views. There is though something to be said for depicting a number of men who have solid reputations or are in powerful systemic roles as pretty feeble for that is what some tend to be. She can also see that simply being male, whether strong or weak, isn't necessarily an automatic entry into the old boy network. The majority of men are excluded from the privileges of the elites, just as are the majority of women. Ultimately whoever is doing the talking, feminism emerges first and foremost as an economic phenomenon. You might disagree but, for what it's worth, that is how it seems to me.
    Last edited by Guest; 03-07-12, 12:41.

    Comment

    • scottycelt

      Dearie me, handsome, I would never insist you read anything ... that's a bit above my pay scale, as they say!

      I merely pointed out to the 'knowledgeable ones' who immediately mocked my comment that Ms Leslie is a 'feminist', that this (her being a 'feminist') is quite a common belief, even at the BBC, and, more significantly, the garrulous Ms Leslie considers herself to be one ( if of a revisionary sort).

      These are the facts ... I regret I am quite unable to change them, even for you and the other 'knowledgeable ones'.

      Comment

      • Flosshilde
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 7988

        Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
        Maybe if I stop reading about all points of view then I'll become as well-informed as you and them?
        Perhaps if you started reading a few points of view other than your own you might become slightly better informed than you are now.

        Comment

        • scottycelt

          Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
          Perhaps if you started reading a few points of view other than your own you might become slightly better informed than you are now.
          Oh, I've been avidly reading your posts for years now, Flossie, so I'm starting to feel like a veritable human information bureau, these days ...

          Comment

          • amateur51

            Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
            Oh, I've been avidly reading your posts for years now, Flossie, so I'm starting to feel like a veritable human information bureau, these days ...
            With those legs, scotty? - I have you down more as an escritoire

            Last edited by Guest; 03-07-12, 17:28. Reason: trypo

            Comment

            • Serial_Apologist
              Full Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 37628

              Originally posted by amateur51 View Post
              With those legs, scotty? - I have you down more as an escritoire

              http://www.new-laroyba.com/produk/LRW103.jpg
              Early Victorian, at a guess - about 1840

              Comment

              • amateur51

                Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                Early Victorian, at a guess - about 1840

                Comment

                • scottycelt

                  Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                  Early Victorian, at a guess - about 1840
                  Don't get Amsey and Flossie too over-excited .... I'm actually a Chippendale.

                  Comment

                  • Flosshilde
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 7988

                    Aparently most Chppendales are fake.

                    Comment

                    • Richard Tarleton

                      It's the fake tan and the steroids.

                      Has anyone referred to the episode a couple of weeks or more earlier, when our Chloe was up against Labour's formidable Rachel Reeves on Newsnight? It was one of those odd confrontations where the government spokesperson declines to debate with their opposite number but insists on being interviewed separately, although they're sitting feet away from eachother. The opposition person says how willing they are to debate....it was a rabbit in headlights job.

                      Comment

                      • scottycelt

                        Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
                        Aparently most Chppendales are fake.
                        Well, that is certainly an area where you will be undoubtedly better-read than I, Floss ...

                        Comment

                        • Flosshilde
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 7988

                          Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View Post
                          It's the fake tan and the steroids.
                          They do terrible things to you, steroids. You only have to look at Scotty's portrait to see that. (mind you, if that's the one he puts on show, goodness knows what the one in hte attic looks like


                          Has anyone referred to the episode a couple of weeks or more earlier, when our Chloe was up against Labour's formidable Rachel Reeves on Newsnight? It was one of those odd confrontations where the government spokesperson declines to debate with their opposite number but insists on being interviewed separately, although they're sitting feet away from eachother. The opposition person says how willing they are to debate....it was a rabbit in headlights job.
                          Haven't seen that one. All the parties do it, & I can't imagine why. They come off far worse than they would if they engaged in a debate - they just look afraid of being challenged, & it implies that they know they would lose.

                          Comment

                          • handsomefortune

                            good point richard tarleton... afaik the specific smith and reeves 'newsnight' encounter hasn't been posted on utube, (as yet) but someone might post it now that attention is on chloe's 'gripping' beeb and ch 4 appearances.

                            there is Labour's formidable Rachel Reeves on recent events as regards libor. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_gGP9ofJqg .......probably the last appearance the chancellor made before dumping ('the youngest tory mp ever') in charge. i notice osborn finishes up last week, by using identical tactics to chloe's tv debut: 'i can't possibly speak about xyz'. curiously, during osborn's speech, chloe is nowhere to be seen, ....doesn't even have a nodding role on the bench, which is odd as she's just about to be given 100% responsibility for explaining the u turn on petrol only days later.

                            didn't the new dg also disappear when the beeb's jubilee coverage was criticised? however, paxo didn't vanish after criticism. instead, this weekend paxo helped with a double page spread in 'the times' expressing an (urgently needed) side of himself that we 'rarely see'. pictured fishing 30yrs ago, and with his current partner elizabeth clough. another whole page is taken up with a current large photo portrait, with the caption 'bullyboy or pussycat'? with 'reassurances' (in large bold type) that "he is shockingly unlike his on-screen persona'. personally, i'd rather have merely heard paxo occasionally acknowledge his news competitors. the fact that krishnan guru murthy probably managed to put across 'the shambles' more usefully, accessibly, and without being personally insulting. except there's the last paragraph of catherine bennett's article: apparently a beeb director suggests Remove the "Paxman premium" on viewing figures associated with his presence on Newsnight, imagine this gladiatorial ban extended throughout current affairs programmes, and the legacy of poor Chloe, if applied equally to all interviewees, could be to spare vast audiences the bother of political engagement, while ministers tell one another exactly what gets them up in the morning....... What a victory for women that would be.

                            poor chloe once recommended a 140 mile journey from bolton to sunderland daily.. to a disabled employee in chloe's constituency http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...1ooBgrw4M&NR=1

                            coincidentally, chloe and rachel seem to be competing ...by waering similar pink jackets...? funny how that can happen http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Fnmn...eature=related

                            from the comments below, you often get an idea of what younger generations think of being repeatedly duped by over ambitious, pointless, expensive ideas. is it any wonder many don't bother to vote? unfathomable excesses are especially difficult to justify when people are short of cash, jobs few, and rent extortionate, hitting the young (and vulnerable citizens generally) the hardest. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=UjhBf4vlTw0

                            rachel's credentials http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Reeves

                            chloe's credentials http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chloe_Smith

                            Comment

                            • french frank
                              Administrator/Moderator
                              • Feb 2007
                              • 30256

                              Originally posted by handsomefortune View Post
                              What does this mean?

                              "She was the Under-14 UK girls chess champion[7] and always had an aptitude for maths.[8] Contrary to popular belief, she has never been Under-14 UK girls chess champion. [9]"
                              It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                              Comment

                              • handsomefortune

                                oh that french frank - not to worry, presumably it means she's not sure. it could have been chess, but then it could have been existentialism. or astrology - a lot depends on how you look at things you know?

                                these are our 21st c mps it's all very modern - we are probably too old skool to understand, after all there aren't many older people in the uk...just youngsters, and they know how to do things best. not like the old ways..that didn't work because they were old. telling fibs that's young, and cool, and gr8 for chillaxing, as are total contradictions. yeah!

                                Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X