Originally posted by mangerton
View Post
The Queen's Jubilee
Collapse
X
-
VodkaDilc
-
Wallace
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostI don't recall ever having witnessed a more patronising, self-indulgent presentation as this one. Matt Baker and Sophie Raworth are better suited to CBeebies, but only as a last resort. it was utterly nauseating. Where does the BBC dig out these people from. I'm even beginning to have a tiny drop of respect for those Proms interval "special guests".(Just kidding.)
Comment
-
VodkaDilc
Originally posted by scottycelt View PostThe Sky coverage was definitely far superior to the Beeb's ... simple as that ... like or loathe Old Rupey & Sonny Jim.
It seems that today the BBC has provided tabloid-style coverage and Sky broadsheet coverage. I know which I prefer.
Comment
-
Why are people complaining, if they've chosen to watch this stuff?
Sky would appear to have treated its viewers as adults - which, objectively, many of them consider themselves to be - whereas the BBC treats them as children - which, intellectually, they know them to be.
I know I'd deserve to be treated as a child if I'd tuned in, rather than being subjected to the hushed, unctious Richard Dimbleby tones of a deferential age now long gone.
Comment
-
-
scottycelt
Originally posted by VodkaDilc View PostThe anti-Sky brigade remind me of the Little Britain sketch (BBC comedy show), where Walliams takes the role of a middle-aged, middle-class woman who accepts cake or whatever and enjoys it until she finds it has been prepared by someone from an ethnic minority group - and promptly vomits profusely. A little 'blind testing', such as BAL reviewers sometimes use would perhaps be a good idea.
It seems that today the BBC has provided tabloid-style coverage and Sky broadsheet coverage. I know which I prefer.
Comment
-
scottycelt
-
VodkaDilc
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostWhy are people complaining, if they've chosen to watch this stuff?
Sky would appear to have treated its viewers as adults - which, objectively, many of them consider themselves to be - whereas the BBC treats them as children - which, intellectually, they know them to be.
I know I'd deserve to be treated as a child if I'd tuned in, rather than being subjected to the hushed, unctious Richard Dimbleby tones of a deferential age now long gone.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wallace View PostI have to agree. They were a couple of lightweights and, yes, a children's programme would have been more suited to them - especially the man whom I had never seen or heard before. ...... It was badly done BBC, badly done.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by VodkaDilc View PostGoing off at a tangent and though he's by no means deferential, I was surprised to hear Jonathan Dimbleby announcing that yesterday was his last Any Questions/Answers after 20-odd years. A shame - the best of the Dimblebys by far!
Comment
-
-
VodkaDilc
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostI disagree - high time His Bumbleyness was pensioned off - constant irrelevant, bumbling interruptions to panellists. Actually he'll still be presenting AQ - it's AA he's handing over.
Comment
-
Originally posted by VodkaDilc View PostThat's good news - are you sure? I thought he presented AA from home - so surely less arduous than AQ! I know he's older than me (I was a student with his younger brother), so he's getting on a bit. (He also has young grandchildren AND young children, he said.)
Anyway, he announced on Friday's programme that he's stepping down from Any Answers "to spend more time with his family" (a new sprog, and new grandchildren, I think he said)
Comment
-
Comment