About two or three weeks ago my TV decided to shed all channels and informed me "No signal". No idea what's happened but suspect squirrels may have had a go at the aerial cable. A bit surprised that I still don't miss the TV, not even Corrie (hello Caliban). Signs of old age? R3 having become a bit of an irritant there's now plenty of time to revisit my LP, tape and CD collection - and return to reading more books. Full circle?
Life without television
Collapse
X
-
amateur51
I'm very much the same, Pianorak. If I want to watch TV I go to the iPlayer - I thoroughly enjoy The Bridge
Otherwise as you say, it's books, IRR and CDs ... and Radio 3 when it's being sensible Radio 4 is a regular source of interesting programmes too
-
3rd Viennese School
Still in the Dark Ages here in Kent!
Four channels but does one buy a set top box for copious amounts of channels that one wouldn’t have time to watch, or does one save money and compose more 12 note pop tunes instead?
3VS
Comment
-
If you really want some good choices on the digital channels, you can easily avoid the dross. BBC Four has some of the best documentaries being made at the moment., and I wouldn't sniff at 5 USA for enjoyable crime series like Justified. There is also the advantage that with the right equipment you can record and edit, or even burn to DVD. I still use a CRT set because my Loewe model gives such good colour balance, but many flat screen TVs have improved hugely. Go on! Take the plunge!
I agree with you that Webern knew a good tune when he heard one.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by 3rd Viennese School View PostFour channels . . .
One's grammar is appaling.
One's grammar is not appalling, but one's spelling needs attention.My life, each morning when I dress, is four and twenty hours less. (J Richardson)
Comment
-
-
3rd Viennese School
It's also one's typing that's apppaling!
I will stick to drawings here at work and my secretary can type these up for me
Comment
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostI always thought it was a digitised pond-skater...
My life, each morning when I dress, is four and twenty hours less. (J Richardson)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pianorak View PostSigns of old age?
I've no problem with people feeling that TV still offers enough as to be 'indispensable' to them (even if less so than once). What is almost on the point of goading me into an Harrrumph is when 'people', usually of about 25+, are totally incapable of comprehending how anyone could possibly exist without a television ... When a child came to my door recently, chugging or for some commercial purpose, her jaw literally dropped when I said I had no TV.
And, for the information of those who have no TV (and therefore pay no licence fee): I was reading the BBC's Royal Charter a week or so ago and discovered the joyous news that, if you live in the UK - you are almost certainly, officially, a licence fee payer, whether you have a licence or not
Charter, paragraph 57, 'Interpretations':
The meaning of “licence fee payer”
In this Charter, a reference to a “licence fee payer” is not to be taken literally but includes, not only a person to whom a TV licence is issued under section 364 of the Communications Act 2003, but also (so far as is sensible in the context) any other person in the UK who watches, listens to or uses any BBC service, or may do so or wish to do so in the future.
I did not know that
[In any case, common sense would tell us that since the population of the country is 60m + and there are only, give or take, 25m licences, less than half the population can claim to be 'a licence fee payer'.]It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
I work for cable tv in Canada and DON'T have cable and DON'T miss it.
We went digital tv last year.
My partner brought me a DTV converter for off-air reception and I get 12 channels with an antenna in my apartment.
My tv is an 11 year old JVC 27 inch CRT and rated at 720P STUNNING pict. BUT I do plan to buy a flat screen ans less obtrusive in my apt.
As I don't go to movies, too cheap for that, I love the widescreen for movies at home.
I can hook up my computer to the new tv when I get it and watch what I want online
Years back, the comedy duo Wayne and Shuster did a HILARIOUS skit called 'I was a tv addict. I have the lp. They were ahead of their time on that one
Comment
-
-
Anna
I have digital, (but not Sky) analogue was switched off 2 years ago. I watch mainly BBC, such things lately as The Romans series BBC2 and other documentaries, BBC4 have very good ones. Also, on 4 Nordic series like The Bridge, The Killing. I'm quite selective about what I watch.
What perturbs me is when I visit one member of the family and from 7.30am the tv is turned on to keep the children quiet, ditto when they get back from school. I'm sure CBeebies is educational in its way, but I think they should be outside playing or reading.
Comment
-
I've no problem with people feeling that TV still offers enough as to be 'indispensable' to them (even if less so than once). What is almost on the point of goading me into an Harrrumph is when 'people', usually of about 25+, are totally incapable of comprehending how anyone could possibly exist without a television ... When a child came to my door recently, chugging or for some commercial purpose, her jaw literally dropped when I said I had no TV.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View Post. . . In this Charter, a reference to a “licence fee payer” is not to be taken literally but includes, not only a person to whom a TV licence is issued under section 364 of the Communications Act 2003, but also (so far as is sensible in the context) any other person in the UK who watches, listens to or uses any BBC service, or may do so or wish to do so in the future. . .My life, each morning when I dress, is four and twenty hours less. (J Richardson)
Comment
-
Comment