Torking Proply an' 'at

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aka Calum Da Jazbo
    Late member
    • Nov 2010
    • 9173

    Torking Proply an' 'at

    there has been some comment [unpleasant and from the Sun i believe about Roy H's use of spoken language ... btw he makes a nice distinction between hope and expect in that he did hope but did not expect to be called &c

    in bagatelling around google and blogs the following also make their point about the open ended nature of language ... and the dead end of snobbery
    According to the best estimates of astronomers there are at least one hundred billion galaxies in the observable universe.
  • JFLL
    Full Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 780

    #2
    Originally posted by aka Calum Da Jazbo View Post
    there has been some comment [unpleasant and from the Sun i believe about Roy H's use of spoken language ... btw he makes a nice distinction between hope and expect in that he did hope but did not expect to be called &c

    in bagatelling around google and blogs the following also make their point about the open ended nature of language ... and the dead end of snobbery
    The spipers seem to be failing to make a distinction between a speech impediment and what he actually says. He strikes me as rather articulate for a football manager, but maybe the Sun thinks Harry Redknapp should be our model.. Hodgson is said to know five languages, not surprising when you consider his experience abroad. I wonder how many of the Sun's reporters do?

    Comment

    • Serial_Apologist
      Full Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 37628

      #3
      Speech impediment? A lot of kids are going to be at the mercy of bullies this day and forever more as a result of this crass headline. He's a Londoner isn't he? It's common (in the literal sense ) for us to pwonounce our Rs as Ws. It was one of the things they managed to electrocute out of me so I could take the role of Pwide in the 7 Deadly Sins aged 11.

      Comment

      • amateur51

        #4
        Originally posted by JFLL View Post
        The spipers seem to be failing to make a distinction between a speech impediment and what he actually says. He strikes me as rather articulate for a football manager, but maybe the Sun thinks Harry Redknapp should be our model.. Hodgson is said to know five languages, not surprising when you consider his experience abroad. I wonder how many of the Sun's reporters do?
        Dammit man, he's been seen on board areoplanes reading hard-backed novels

        End of trivialisation as we know it

        Comment

        • Lateralthinking1

          #5
          Well, in my post earlier today I used both "expect" and "anticipate" to make one point. That point was that past England managers have been rubbish. The examples I provided when using those words were different from each other. The reader could have assumed identical meaning in my use of the two words or found different meanings. The essence of the argument would have been exactly the same. That rather makes any alleged pure difference between the meanings of the two words remote. At best it is meaningfully applicable only in some cases, and even then mostly for nuance, where other words are also being used.

          I am not sure that I accept that the "w" for "r" is a speech impediment. In many people it is affectation. Predictably it emanates from the upper classes. William Whitelaw springs to mind as indeed does now Jeremy Peace of the Football Association. It is also in those who began life in ordinary places and had to adjust to new expectations with advancement. Roy Jenkins is a good example while Roy Hodgson and Trevor Brooking might well be others. Once acquired, it is a habit that is impossible to break.

          I have a long-standing issue with posh people dropping the "e" in the word "geography". It is a similar affliction. These things tend to travel like wildfire, new ones arrive every year and unfortunately the nonsense tends to stick. 2010 was the year of "like". "He was like "do you think so?" and I was like "oh my god" and she was like "no way"" etc etc. 2011 brought us "went". "I went "you must be joking" and he went "oh no I'm not" and she went "you two always make me laugh". 2012 is the year of "get". Teenagers of all classes now walk into shops and when asked for their order say "can I get a ham salad please?" etc. The word is "have". It isn't "get" and like "weally" and "jography" it is only pure as a stance. Don't even mention that the "can" would be better as "may".
          Last edited by Guest; 02-05-12, 15:35.

          Comment

          • Serial_Apologist
            Full Member
            • Dec 2010
            • 37628

            #6
            Originally posted by Lateralthinking1 View Post
            Well, in my post earlier today I used both "expect" and "anticipate" to make one point. That point was that past England managers have been rubbish. The examples I provided when using those words were different from each other. The reader could have assumed identical meaning in my use of the two words or found different meanings. The essence of the argument would have been exactly the same. That rather makes any alleged pure difference between the meanings of the two words remote. At best it is meaningfully applicable only in some cases, and even then mostly for nuance, where other words are also being used.

            I am not sure that I accept that the "w" for "r" is a speech impediment. In many people it is affectation. Predictably it emanates from the upper classes. William Whitelaw springs to mind as indeed does now Jeremy Peace of the Football Association. It is also in those who began life in ordinary places and had to adjust to new expectations with advancement. Roy Jenkins is a good example while Roy Hodgson and Trevor Brooking might well be others. Once acquired, it is a habit that is impossible to break.

            I have a long-standing issue with posh people dropping the "e" in the word "geography". It is a similar affliction. These things tend to travel like wildfire, new ones arrive every year and unfortunately the nonsense tends to stick. 2010 was the year of "like". "He was like "do you think so?" and I was like "oh my god" and she was like "no way"" etc etc. 2011 brought us "went". "I went "you must be joking" and he went "oh no I'm not" and she went "you two always make me laugh". 2012 is the year of "get". Teenagers of all classes now walk into shops and when asked for their order say "can I get a ham salad please?" etc. The word is "have". It isn't "get" and like "weally" and "jography" it is only pure as a stance. Don't even mention that the "can" would be better as "may".
            And thanks, Lat, for writing "different from"....

            Comment

            • Eine Alpensinfonie
              Host
              • Nov 2010
              • 20570

              #7
              It hardly matters if the chosen England manager is the right person for the job. And Roy likes opera too.

              However, when Breakfast TV and weather forecast presenters speak with a regional accent that even I as a Salford-born northerner find grating, perhaps political correctness is going too far. Stephanie McGovern, for example, gives us North-westerners a bad name. I can understand her, as I was brought up in an area where everyone spoke like that. But on television, it's cringeworthy.

              Comment

              • Eine Alpensinfonie
                Host
                • Nov 2010
                • 20570

                #8
                Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                And thanks, Lat, for writing "different from"....


                Comment

                • Anna

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                  However, when Breakfast TV and weather forecast presenters speak with a regional accent that even I as a Salford-born northerner find grating, perhaps political correctness is going too far. Stephanie McGovern, for example, gives us North-westerners a bad name. I can understand her, as I was brought up in an area where everyone spoke like that. But on television, it's cringeworthy.
                  What a very odd point of view, are you wishing to go back to the days of RP? Nothing wrong with regional accents, I guess around 95% of the UK population have them, and John Humphrys, Huw Edwards, do they grate on you as well?

                  Comment

                  • Serial_Apologist
                    Full Member
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 37628

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Anna View Post
                    What a very odd point of view, are you wishing to go back to the days of RP? Nothing wrong with regional accents, I guess around 95% of the UK population have them, and John Humphrys, Huw Edwards, do they grate on you as well?
                    Huw Edwards' Welshness is very muted; and John Humphrys' inaudible though. But I agree, Anna. Regional accents are authentic, whether broad or dilute, any insistence on what used to be called "BBC English" a genuflection to supposed middle class superiority.

                    Comment

                    • Anna

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                      Huw Edwards' Welshness is very muted; and John Humphrys' inaudible though. But I agree, Anna. Regional accents are authentic, whether broad or dilute, any insistence on what used to be called "BBC English" a genuflection to supposed middle class superiority.
                      Well, I can still hear John Humphry's Welshness! But, to disapprove of regional accents does smack of nobility v the serfs!

                      Comment

                      • Lateralthinking1

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                        It hardly matters if the chosen England manager is the right person for the job. And Roy likes opera too.

                        However, when Breakfast TV and weather forecast presenters speak with a regional accent that even I as a Salford-born northerner find grating, perhaps political correctness is going too far. Stephanie McGovern, for example, gives us North-westerners a bad name. I can understand her, as I was brought up in an area where everyone spoke like that. But on television, it's cringeworthy.
                        This is a very good point.

                        There was a time when there were two forms of Liverpudlian - 1. Liverpudlian and 2. Cilla Black. Now every regional accent is of the Cilla Black variety. It all took off with that continuity man on Channel 4 who gave us Geordie with four sugars and anabolic steroids.

                        Comment

                        • Eine Alpensinfonie
                          Host
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 20570

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Anna View Post
                          What a very odd point of view, are you wishing to go back to the days of RP? Nothing wrong with regional accents, I guess around 95% of the UK population have them, and John Humphrys, Huw Edwards, do they grate on you as well?
                          John Humphrys has only a slight regional accent. I think he would agree with me, and one of my favourite books is his "Lost for Words".
                          If "going back to the days of RP" meant presenters speaking decent English, then I would go with that. However, many speak bad English with a posh voice, which is probably worse, as the RP accent can suggest authority, thereby setting a bad example.

                          Comment

                          • Eine Alpensinfonie
                            Host
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 20570

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                            ... any insistence on what used to be called "BBC English" a genuflection to supposed middle class superiority.
                            No it isn't. It's just good manners to communicate effectively. If these means some refinement of accent, so be it.

                            Comment

                            • Anna

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                              No it isn't. It's just good manners to communicate effectively. If these means some refinement of accent, so be it.
                              Indeed, which is why you'll never get anyone from Birmingham or Norfolk reading the news .......

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X