Originally posted by subcontrabass
View Post
-
By jove, so they have! Triomphe!It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world. -
Not so much pedantry, but a question to those who've a knowledge of language development.
Farther/Further
Nowadays "further" is used almost universally, but in the literature of Jonathan Swift, Jane Austen and Walt Whitman, "farther" is the word that is used.
Of course, there's less likelihood of confusion with "further", as it is unlikely to be confused with a male parent, but I would like to know more about this.Comment
-
"Farther" is best used in relation to physical distance while "further" is more appositely used regarding metaphysical applications. There are further references to this issue to be found via Internet searches.Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostComment
-
I shall see if I can find the source of this after several years, but I recall that there is evidence that proto-Indo-European had a complex system of vowel changes within words that was gradually replaced in newer languages by more simple inflexions. But the most commonly used among these are still with us - sing, sang, sung, song, for instance. Maybe further/farther is connected (the fact that modern usage gives subtly different meanings doesn't really answer your point - they are just useful developments).Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
Then again there's Great Vowel Shift fallout that left two versions of the same word - merchant and marchant, for instance, or clerk and clark. Or indeed (though it's not the vowel that shifted) shirt/shift/skirt.Last edited by Pabmusic; 29-01-19, 00:10.Comment
-
Yes, I’ve looked at those references (which largely apply to US English) but in practice, “farther” has fallen into disuse, while is “Sense and Sensibility”, the opposite is true.Originally posted by Bryn View PostComment
-
.
... Alpie - I very much recommend you look at the several pages on farther/further in the 1996 edn of The New Fowler's Modern English Usage, which explore in detail the etymology and evolving usage patterns of both forms.
.Comment
-
-
Interesting to read Fowler. It had never occurred to me that further/farther are actually related to "forth" not "far" It seems that the original but now obsolete comparative "farrer" was driven out by those forms. I would think that "forth" has only ever been an adverb, as in "he went forth" (he went away). This must have led to "he went forther", ie he kept on going. Somehow farther/further came also to be used adjectivally. Any further questions?Originally posted by vinteuil View PostComment
-
When to leave out the word " That".
It vaguely irritates me when it is left out in a formal context, EG BBC news report. It probably shouldn't.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.Comment
-
It really annoys me too.Originally posted by teamsaint View PostWhen to leave out the word " That".
It vaguely irritates me when it is left out in a formal context, EG BBC news report. It probably shouldn't.
But on the other hand, I would also add a comma BEFORE the 'if' in one of the examples:
You also need to ensure you don’t accidentally put in a double that. This sentence is not right: “Natalie knows that if she doesn’t remember to feed her fish that the poor little guy will die.” It needs just one that, the first one: “Natalie knows that if she doesn’t remember to feed her fish, the poor little guy will die.” A comma after “fish” will help readers understand the sentence.
I would write:
“Natalie knows that, if she doesn’t remember to feed her fish, the poor little guy will die.”
Indeed, I'd write:
You also need to ensure THAT you don't accidentally......
I like the advice from the AP guide:
The AP Stylebook, which is typically used by journalists, suggests you use a that when in doubt (2). It advises, “Omission can hurt. Inclusion never does.”
That's how I treat the so-called Oxford comma, too.Comment
-
Nice useful website, ts.
I've just looked up the entry on 'like' (comparison) instead of 'such as' (inclusion), which also annoys me and which I wanted to explain to an Italian friend whose translations I am sometimes asked to comment on.
Comment
-
Just wondering: how is one supposed to pronounce Flybmi? Fly B.M.I.? (I've never heard it said
)
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.Comment
-
That sounds right, from a Google video search:
Comment
-
Hmmm. And I'd always mentally pronounced flybe fly-bee, but I suppose that might be Fly B.E.Originally posted by Mal View PostIt isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.Comment
-
If it's Fly Body Mass Index, it's no wonder the form has fallen out of the sky!Originally posted by french frank View PostComment
Comment