Originally posted by jean
View Post
Pedants' Paradise
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
There was a lot of talk yesterday about how people are avoiding statins because they have an unfounded fear that the drug will cause unpleasant or dangerous side-effects.
The discussion called this the nocebo effect. But surely that's something a bit different?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostThere was a lot of talk yesterday about how people are avoiding statins because they have an unfounded fear that the drug will cause unpleasant or dangerous side-effects.
The discussion called this the nocebo effect. But surely that's something a bit different?
Is that what you meant?It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostThere was a lot of talk yesterday about how people are avoiding statins because they have an unfounded fear that the drug will cause unpleasant or dangerous side-effects.
The discussion called this the nocebo effect. But surely that's something a bit different?
I would question the use of 'unfounded' in jean's post, as that would imply that there are no side effects at all, ever, from statins. As that is not the case then patients' fears do have some foundation; whether they are justified is a different matter.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostAfter glancing (over)quickly at the article, yes, it seems to be quite different. One would imply that people taking statins and reading about the possible side-effects have something of a tendency to suffer those very side effects through a psychological expectation that it will harm them. That's not the same as not taking the medication, in case something …
Is that what you meant?
As for my use of unfounded, that was my version of rthe reports - me, I wouldn't let a statin anywhere near me.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostYes, that's it exactly. (Etymologically considered, placebo = 'I shall please'; nocebo = 'I shall harm'.
As for my use of unfounded, that was my version of rthe reports - me, I wouldn't let a statin anywhere near me.
Comment
-
-
.
... as we know, 'their' is a long-establisht way in English of expressing a singular gender-neutral genitive 'her or his'.
I am pleased to see that 'The Times' now uses 'them' as a way of expressing a singular gender-neutral accusative 'her or him' - with reference to Macron's plans for his government should he be elected -
. "He has already decided on the prime minister, whom he would appoint upon taking office next weekend, but would not name them."
.Last edited by vinteuil; 05-05-17, 11:28.
Comment
-
-
.
... a program (or programme) specially (or especially) designed to warm (or chill) the cockles of Ein: Alpensinf:'s heart - (and what, pray, are the 'cockles' of your heart?) -
Radio 4, Saturday 20 May at 10:30 hrs -
"Americanize! Why the Americanisation of English is a Good Thing" Susie Dent considers whether turns of phrase or idiosyncratic spellings leaking from American English into the native version of the language is really a bad thing - .
Comment
-
-
Re Americanisation, when I read Gone With The Wind, I was quite surprised by the lack of Americanisms within it, apart from a few spellings. On reading Alexandra Ripley's authorised sequel, Scarlett, it was almost perverse in its grating grammar. Otherwise, it was well worth reading - rather better than the sensationalised TV version that followed.
English is possibly the most misspelt major language in the world. That isn't because English speakers are necessarily stupid, but because spellings are so perverse. Pick up a Spanish (or Italian) text and it's possible for anyone who has learnt the basic phonetics of the language(s) to read it fluently and fairly accurately, without even being able to understand it.
The English Spelling Society would like to do something about this, in the absence of anything like the French 'Academie Francaise', but made a diplomatic howler by saying the British should adopt American spellings. They seemed to have gone very quiet over this suggestion, but surely there's scope for considering spelling reform to get us away from the mentality of pounds and ounces/ pounds, shillings and pence?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View PostRadio 4, Saturday 20 May at 10:30 hrs -
"Americanize! Why the Americanisation of English is a Good Thing" Susie Dent considers whether turns of phrase or idiosyncratic spellings leaking from American English into the native version of the language is really a bad thing -
Comment
-
Comment