Pedants' Paradise

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • french frank
    Administrator/Moderator
    • Feb 2007
    • 30456

    Originally posted by Padraig View Post
    'I was yesterday invited by a gentleman to dinner, who promised that our entertainment should consist of an haunch of venison, a turtle, and a great man.' Oliver Goldsmith
    Good find - I think one of the sites we had a link to said it wasn't a matter of how a word was written, but how pronounced (e.g. an hour). That suggests Goldsmith said 'an aunch'.

    1573–80 J. Baret Aluearie H 66 An hanch of venison.
    1712 J. Addison Spectator No. 482. ¶4 The best Pickle for a Wallnut, or Sawce for an Haunch of Venison.

    This uncertainty over 'an' explains why we now say an adder rather than a nadder (nǣdre), and, I presume, the variations on orange-arancia-naranja-nāranj.
    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

    Comment

    • vinteuil
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 12936

      Originally posted by french frank View Post

      This uncertainty over 'an' explains why we now say an adder rather than a nadder (nǣdre), and, I presume, the variations on orange-arancia-naranja-nāranj.
      ... yes - and the same for 'an eft / an ewt' - 'a newt'

      Comment

      • Old Grumpy
        Full Member
        • Jan 2011
        • 3643

        In relation to Petrushka's post on The Techie Board

        This should read CDRs not CDR's surely...


        OG

        Comment

        • Bryn
          Banned
          • Mar 2007
          • 24688

          Originally posted by Old Grumpy View Post
          In relation to Petrushka's post on The Techie Board

          This should read CDRs not CDR's surely...


          OG
          No. It should read CD-Rs.

          Comment

          • Old Grumpy
            Full Member
            • Jan 2011
            • 3643

            Pedant!

            Comment

            • ahinton
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 16123

              Originally posted by french frank View Post
              Pedant!
              Well, at least I got the thread right!

              Comment

              • french frank
                Administrator/Moderator
                • Feb 2007
                • 30456

                Originally posted by ahinton View Post
                Well, at least I got the thread right!
                On this thread 'Pedant' is the equivalent of Mornington Crescent. Or to take it a step further: Camden Town.
                It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                Comment

                • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                  Gone fishin'
                  • Sep 2011
                  • 30163

                  My Rs ain't seedy!
                  [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                  Comment

                  • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                    Gone fishin'
                    • Sep 2011
                    • 30163

                    Perhaps that should be on the "People Summed Up in Four Words" Thread?
                    [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                    Comment

                    • french frank
                      Administrator/Moderator
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 30456

                      Originally posted by Dermot View Post
                      Elizabeth Taylor tells of the occasion she went to the theatre with Ivy Compton-Burnett and Herman Schrijver to see a performance of Beckett's Happy Days:

                      It was a sparse audience and Ivy took a great interest in it.
                      'Would you call it an intellectual audience, Herman?' (Too distinct voice in too empty auditorium).
                      'One or two look that way inclined,' he whispered. 'Do you think they are staring at us, because they think we are intellectuals?'
                      'Of course they don't think that,' she said scornfully, 'We are far too well dressed.'
                      Many a true word … The story does suggest a connection with a 'social elite', though I'm not sure whether Dame Ivy was betraying her own view or second guessing what the audience members might think.

                      It seems that, regardless of what Camus himself said or thought, the word 'intellectual' is susceptible of many interpretations - favourable and unfavourable (mainly the latter in this country). Perhaps that goes back to the time when most people had no chance to go to university, and half of those who did go weren't interested in studying (were too well dressed, in fact!).

                      [Ed: susceptible to or susceptible of? I've tried both and I think they both look all right. Marginally, I prefer 'of'. I think.]
                      It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                      Comment

                      • DracoM
                        Host
                        • Mar 2007
                        • 12986

                        'of' deffo.

                        Comment

                        • jean
                          Late member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 7100

                          This is interesting.

                          Comment

                          • french frank
                            Administrator/Moderator
                            • Feb 2007
                            • 30456

                            Originally posted by jean View Post
                            This is interesting.
                            Yes. My second thoughts were provoked by the vague perception:

                            Susceptible of roughly means capable of, admitting. Something can be susceptible of proof, of a solution, of division, of observation, of being considered, etc.
                            Susceptible to roughly means able to be affected by. Something (or someone) can be susceptible to light, to disease, to infection, to poison, to attack, etc.

                            But I liked the conclusion that if you can't be bothered with such minutiae, just use 'susceptible to' because that's what all the dictionaries will say in 100 years time.

                            I hijacked my thread. I will remove these to Pedants' Paradise …
                            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                            Comment

                            • vinteuil
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 12936

                              Originally posted by jean View Post
                              This is interesting.
                              ... indeed it is. Thank you for alerting us to this : a nuance of which I had not been consciously aware.

                              Comment

                              • jean
                                Late member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 7100

                                Nor had I!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X