Originally posted by Pabmusic
View Post
Pedants' Paradise
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Pabmusic View Post"Go slow" is actually adverbial (and old) rather than an idiom.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostYes, I see now from the time you posted.
Except that no meaning has been changed - the inflammable option has just been quietly dropped altogether.Acetate, Rayon & Viscose
Smooth on the skin and excellent colour absorbency
Low resistance when damp
Highly inflammable and static electricity build up
Do no spin
Comment
-
-
It's very unusual to find inflammable these days.
My main point, though, is that there has been no change of meaning - inflammable (where it is found) means exactly what it's always meant; it has been joined, and bids fair to be superseded, by flammable, which means the same.
The addition of highly helps to make the meaning clearer, of course.
.Last edited by jean; 12-08-14, 11:12.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostIt's very unusual to find inflammable these days.
My main point, though, is that there has been no change of meaning - inflammable (where it is found) means exactly what it's always meant; it has been joined, and bids fair to be superseded, by flammable, which means the same.
Well this is the Pedants' Paradise thread. Just how pedantic I was being to quote that example is illustrated by the "Do no spin" etc. English was clearly not the copywriter's first language.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostBut only cyberspatially, one presumes...
Mightn't the current Price of Wales qualify at some future point as a "fearful ruler"?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostOr that between "flammable" and "inflammable"? I would expect that the chances of getting to the bottom of such matters are both fat and slim.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostOnly if when visiting Buckingham Palace one is travelling up to London. But you'd have to be located to the south of London to do that, no?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostWhile we're on the subject of "going slow(ly)", it occurs to me that an offshoot of this particular neck of the pedantic woods might manifest itself in the question as to the difference, if any, between "slowing up" and "slowing down", although I'm unsure what, if anything, the Latin Grammar Police might have to say about that one...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Hitch View PostIf travelling by rail, the "up" direction is usually towards a large town. In Britain, this often means taking the "up" train to London and the "down" train to get away from it as quickly as possible.
However, it's a little strange that road atlases start from the south-west and work progressively to the east and north until NE Scotland is reached.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostHardly anyone in the North speaks of going "up" to London. It's down south, and that settles the matter.
However, it's a little strange that road atlases start from the south-west and work progressively to the east and north until NE Scotland is reached.
Comment
-
Comment