Pedants' Paradise

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jean
    Late member
    • Nov 2010
    • 7100

    Originally posted by Pabmusic View Post
    There is a (sort of) answer to this one. This is quite interesting and shows the confusion that can arise:

    Why has flammable replaced inflammable in safety instructions?
    Of course! Isn't that what I've just said?

    Comment

    • french frank
      Administrator/Moderator
      • Feb 2007
      • 30210

      Originally posted by Pabmusic View Post
      "Go slow" is actually adverbial (and old) rather than an idiom.
      Yes, I was using the term 'exceeding loosely', more in the Greek sense of being 'of oneself', 'characteristic'. But, on reflection, I don't think even that is true. Schnell?
      It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

      Comment

      • Pabmusic
        Full Member
        • May 2011
        • 5537

        Originally posted by jean View Post
        Of course! Isn't that what I've just said?
        Yes it is, Jean, but I didn't know what you had said until after I'd posted mine.

        Comment

        • jean
          Late member
          • Nov 2010
          • 7100

          Yes, I see now from the time you posted.

          Originally posted by Pabmusic View Post
          Of course, a true pedant should insist on the "correct" meaning, and to hell with safety!
          Except that no meaning has been changed - the inflammable option has just been quietly dropped altogether.

          Comment

          • ahinton
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 16122

            Originally posted by Don Petter View Post
            Careful! Miss can rap a fearful ruler on those knuckles ...
            But only cyberspatially, one presumes...

            Mightn't the current Price of Wales qualify at some future point as a "fearful ruler"?

            Comment

            • Bryn
              Banned
              • Mar 2007
              • 24688

              Originally posted by jean View Post
              Yes, I see now from the time you posted.


              Except that no meaning has been changed - the inflammable option has just been quietly dropped altogether.
              Acetate, Rayon & Viscose
              Smooth on the skin and excellent colour absorbency
              Low resistance when damp
              Highly inflammable and static electricity build up
              Do no spin
              from: http://www.maryling.com/carment_care/ , a URL currently in use.

              Comment

              • jean
                Late member
                • Nov 2010
                • 7100

                It's very unusual to find inflammable these days.

                My main point, though, is that there has been no change of meaning - inflammable (where it is found) means exactly what it's always meant; it has been joined, and bids fair to be superseded, by flammable, which means the same.

                The addition of highly helps to make the meaning clearer, of course.

                .
                Last edited by jean; 12-08-14, 11:12.

                Comment

                • Bryn
                  Banned
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 24688

                  Originally posted by jean View Post
                  It's very unusual to find inflammable these days.

                  My main point, though, is that there has been no change of meaning - inflammable (where it is found) means exactly what it's always meant; it has been joined, and bids fair to be superseded, by flammable, which means the same.

                  Well this is the Pedants' Paradise thread. Just how pedantic I was being to quote that example is illustrated by the "Do no spin" etc. English was clearly not the copywriter's first language.

                  Comment

                  • Serial_Apologist
                    Full Member
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 37561

                    Originally posted by ahinton View Post
                    But only cyberspatially, one presumes...

                    Mightn't the current Price of Wales qualify at some future point as a "fearful ruler"?
                    Only if when visiting Buckingham Palace one is travelling up to London. But you'd have to be located to the south of London to do that, no?

                    Comment

                    • Eine Alpensinfonie
                      Host
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 20569

                      Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                      Or that between "flammable" and "inflammable"? I would expect that the chances of getting to the bottom of such matters are both fat and slim.
                      My father may have had something to do with that. He was obsessed with safety and wrote letter after letter to anyone who might have an influence over the word "inflammable", which could be interpreted as "fireproof". He urged manufacturers to find an alternative word/phrase. Others may well have done the same, but he was delighted when products became labelled as "flammable".

                      Comment

                      • Hitch
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 367

                        Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                        Only if when visiting Buckingham Palace one is travelling up to London. But you'd have to be located to the south of London to do that, no?
                        If travelling by rail, the "up" direction is usually towards a large town. In Britain, this often means taking the "up" train to London and the "down" train to get away from it as quickly as possible.

                        Comment

                        • Eine Alpensinfonie
                          Host
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 20569

                          Originally posted by ahinton View Post
                          While we're on the subject of "going slow(ly)", it occurs to me that an offshoot of this particular neck of the pedantic woods might manifest itself in the question as to the difference, if any, between "slowing up" and "slowing down", although I'm unsure what, if anything, the Latin Grammar Police might have to say about that one...
                          I think we've had this one before. Slowing "up" is a bit of a contradiction as the speed is going down. However, it might be used to express greater determination in the action?

                          Comment

                          • Eine Alpensinfonie
                            Host
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 20569

                            Originally posted by Hitch View Post
                            If travelling by rail, the "up" direction is usually towards a large town. In Britain, this often means taking the "up" train to London and the "down" train to get away from it as quickly as possible.
                            Hardly anyone in the North speaks of going "up" to London. It's down south, and that settles the matter.

                            However, it's a little strange that road atlases start from the south-west and work progressively to the east and north until NE Scotland is reached.

                            Comment

                            • Hitch
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 367

                              Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                              Hardly anyone in the North speaks of going "up" to London. It's down south, and that settles the matter.

                              However, it's a little strange that road atlases start from the south-west and work progressively to the east and north until NE Scotland is reached.
                              I should have made it clear that I was referring to railway terminology rather than everyday speech but I didn't want to appear pedantic...

                              Comment

                              • Eine Alpensinfonie
                                Host
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 20569

                                Originally posted by Hitch View Post
                                I should have made it clear that I was referring to railway terminology rather than everyday speech but I didn't want to appear pedantic...
                                But this is the place where you can be pedantic.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X