Pedants' Paradise

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LeMartinPecheur
    Full Member
    • Apr 2007
    • 4717

    Originally posted by Bryn View Post
    This was usually reserved for expensive items, partly for show, and partly to disguise the price (a bit like the way 19/11 was used distract from the fact one was effectively paying £1.
    The original use of 19/11 and 99 cents wasn't actually to kid consumers into thinking the item was cheap, it was to limit scope for employee theft. If the price was a round dollar or pound it was comparatively easy for sales staff to palm the money and 'forget' to ring it through the till. Not so easy if they had to give change.
    Last edited by LeMartinPecheur; 27-06-14, 21:39.
    I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!

    Comment

    • french frank
      Administrator/Moderator
      • Feb 2007
      • 30456

      Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
      (Tho' I did enjoy on a walk down the Uxbridge Road this morning an advertisement for - a Picture Framers's... )
      The Uxbridge company Picture Framers's aim is to provide a 24-hour service to its customers?
      It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

      Comment

      • ferneyhoughgeliebte
        Gone fishin'
        • Sep 2011
        • 30163

        Originally posted by french frank View Post
        The Uxbridge company Picture Framers's aim is to provide a 24-hour service to its customers?
        But first you have to tell them what you've got in your pockets's.
        [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

        Comment

        • french frank
          Administrator/Moderator
          • Feb 2007
          • 30456

          Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
          But first you have to tell them what you've got in your pockets's.
          I was trying to point out how one could construct an entity, 'Picture Framers', as in a business that had registered its name, imaginatively, as 'Picture Framers' rather than using it as descriptive of what it did.

          'For all your picture framing needs, contact your local professional service Picture Framers, 49 Uxbridge High Street. Established 1957 (incorporating J. Smith, picture framer).'

          If you treat that as being a plural noun, it refers to something different, i.e. the individual employees who do the framing out back.
          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

          Comment

          • Eine Alpensinfonie
            Host
            • Nov 2010
            • 20572

            Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur View Post
            The original use of 19/11 and 99 cents wasn't actually to kid consumers into thinking the item was cheap, it was to limit scope for employee theft. If the price was a round dollar or pound it was comparatively easy for sales staff to palm the money and 'forget' to ring it through the till. Not so easy if they had to give change.
            That's fascinating. But I don't think that could apply to those houses costing £299,999.

            Comment

            • ferneyhoughgeliebte
              Gone fishin'
              • Sep 2011
              • 30163

              Originally posted by french frank View Post
              I was trying to point out how one could construct an entity, 'Picture Framers', as in a business that had registered its name, imaginatively, as 'Picture Framers' rather than using it as descriptive of what it did.
              But, in that case, wouldn't " Picture Framers' " suffice? " Picture Framers' - the shop belonging to the people who own Picture Framers "?
              [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

              Comment

              • LeMartinPecheur
                Full Member
                • Apr 2007
                • 4717

                Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                That's fascinating. But I don't think that could apply to those houses costing £299,999.
                Haven't you seen the new £300k note??
                I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!

                Comment

                • french frank
                  Administrator/Moderator
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 30456

                  Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                  But, in that case, wouldn't " Picture Framers' " suffice? " Picture Framers' - the shop belonging to the people who own Picture Framers "?
                  But there you are positing a plural (the people who own Picture Framers). I am positing a singular - the company, corporately - purely to illustrate the theoretical possibilities.

                  Picture Framers' tends to mean of or pertaining to all the various individual framers of pictures; Picture Framers's means of or pertaining to the company registered as Picture Framers.

                  Germane, though slightly different, is : 'View Boots's profile' (online). Boots is the name of the company, rather than Boot, the name of the founder. It might logically have been Boot's's if the name of the company had been Boot's; Sainsbury's write of 'the Sainbury's website', where the inclusion of the definite article makes the point clear. I think.
                  It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                  Comment

                  • Sir Velo
                    Full Member
                    • Oct 2012
                    • 3259

                    Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                    That's fascinating. But I don't think that could apply to those houses costing £299,999.
                    That's a recent development though. You've got to remember that back then there were few, if any, houses selling for that sort of money (equivalent to north of £10m in today's prices). In fact if you look at sales particulars for large country houses none of them sold for that sort of money. Montacute House ("the world famous Montacute" as Country Life described) it was valued for scrap at £5,885 in 1929.

                    Comment

                    • mercia
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 8920

                      prompted by another thread - what is the female equivalent of TRIUMVIRATE please ?

                      Comment

                      • Sir Velo
                        Full Member
                        • Oct 2012
                        • 3259

                        triumgynate

                        Comment

                        • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                          Gone fishin'
                          • Sep 2011
                          • 30163

                          Originally posted by Sir Velo View Post
                          triumgynate
                          Sounds like a political scandal!
                          [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                          Comment

                          • mercia
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 8920

                            Originally posted by Sir Velo View Post
                            triumgynate
                            thanks.

                            I wonder if, let's say, Master of the Queen's Music, Master of the Choristers and Master of the Foxhounds could be described as a triumvirate of titles whether all held by men or not

                            Comment

                            • french frank
                              Administrator/Moderator
                              • Feb 2007
                              • 30456

                              Well, the meanings of vir-viri and homo-hominis may not be quite identical. Jean? Whereas vir usually (almost always?) refers to a man, it can also imply certain 'manlike' qualities, of which being a Master of Something or other might be one.

                              Incidentally, Old French maistre could also be used of a woman - la maistre - because phonologically magistrum and magistram evolve into identical forms. Maîtresse/mistress were later formations.
                              It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                              Comment

                              • Pabmusic
                                Full Member
                                • May 2011
                                • 5537

                                Originally posted by french frank View Post
                                Well, the meanings of vir-viri and homo-hominis may not be quite identical...
                                Interesting. Presumably there's a connexion with the Old English wer (weregild, werewulf) which meant a rather more general 'man' rather than man -vs- woman, something a bit more like 'human'.

                                The sexual distinctions were wifman (female human), from which we get woman and wife; and wæpman (male human) which is a double entendre ("human with a weapon" - nudge nudge, wink wink) which we've lost completely, presumptuously using "man" (= human) instead and thus generating sexism.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X