Originally posted by mangerton
View Post
Pedants' Paradise
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by jean View PostPerhaps this is the place for more on Mr Gwynne.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostThis one did, eventually - though it was a question of two different dialect words rather than different pronunciations of the same one:
For we Englysshe men ben borne under the domynacyon of the mone...[etc]
Caxton continued the passage you quoted:
For in these dayes euery man that is in ony reputacyon in his countrie wyll vtter his commynycacyon and maters in such maners & termes that fewe men shall vnderstonde theym. And som honest and grete clerkes haue ben with me and desired me to wryte the most curious termes that I could fynde. And thus between playne rude & curious I stande abashed. But in my iudgemente the comyn termes that be dayli vsed ben lighter to be vnderstonde than the olde and auncyent englysshe.
It's noticeable, isn't it, that Caxton's London dialect of 1490 is very much easier to understand than Chaucer's of a century before. It's also noticeable that V and U were treated as variants of the same letter (U is generally used for the consonantal form, V for the vowel form - the opposite of how it eventually settled). No J either - iudgemente would have been pronounced 'judgement', and sometimes written with a J - but that was just a consonantal form of I.Last edited by Pabmusic; 31-05-13, 00:11.
Comment
-
-
Yes. Caxton's point was to discuss just which version of English he should use in printing (also, how should it be spelt). He settled eventually on what we now call East Midlands dialect, the language of the London-Oxford-Cambridge triangle. It became 'standard' English.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by aeolium View PostHow different the story of English might have been if Caxton had settled on the dialect of the West Midlands - perhaps less influenced by French and Latin and with more affinity with the "olde and auncyent englysshe".
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostPerhaps this is the place for more on Mr Gwynne.
So I decided not to join the hate campaign.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostThe whole blog is riddled with those nausiating "...ize" endings.
So I decided not to join the hate campaign.
Melvyn Quince
Steven Bird
Bill Poser
and, er, David Beaver. Let's hope it's not a case of nominative determinism.Last edited by Thropplenoggin; 02-06-13, 16:57.It loved to happen. -- Marcus Aurelius
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostThe whole blog is riddled with those nausiating "...ize" endings.
So I decided not to join the hate campaign.
I tend to prefer my Greek endings filtered through French, but I don't see it as a huge problem.
I'm not very keen on nausiating, though.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostI really don't understand why you feel so strongly about them!
I tend to prefer my Greek endings filtered through French, but I don't see it as a huge problem.
I'm not very keen on nausiating, though.
Comment
-
-
I tend to follow the house style of the Oxford University Press in preferring the -ize ending, for the reasons set out by Fowler and in Hart's Rules.
Re the awful Mr Gwynne, I liked AA Gill's take : "Mr Gwynne rhapsodised that, in his day, everyone of whatever class all had perfect grammar and perfect manners. They are, apparently, synonymous. The point of all this is, well, is that there is no point to all this: grammar wardens are playing culturally insecure middle-class Scrabble, they are the intellectual wing of UKIP. Declaiming on grammar is dropping Pooh sticks into a rill that feeds a burn that runs into a stream that disappears into the torrent of the English language. Nobody can dam or alter its path or direct its destination, it belongs to whoever finds it in their mouth. It washes away dictionaries and lexicons and laws and fun-licking grammars. It is global and as free as breathing, and the only truly democratic thing we all own. Don’t let anyone ever tell you that it’s more theirs than yours because they don’t dangle participles."
Comment
-
Comment