Not going to be an open and shut case then.
Pedants' Paradise
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostAt least they got the apostrophe in the right place!It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostSome might disagree Is 'boys' being used adjectivally, describing the 'basics' needed by boys, or do the boys in some sense 'possess' these basics? If it read: "The boys' basics" it would suggest that the basics did indeed belong to particular boys, as in 'the boys' books' where the boys in question are Peter Brown and Paul Smith, and the books are their copies of Bradley's Arnold needed for the next lesson in a few minutes time.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostAh: I thought that that was something wot you wrote!
And it is possible that tort has been committed if we knew more about the context.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Dickens the grammarian
I've recently embarked on rereading, in some few cases reading, all of Dickens's novels, and have enjoyed pondering on how our language and writers' styles have changed over the many intervening decades. But I was bought up short by this near the end of Chapter XLV of Dombey and Son: "The proud, undaunted face... indifferent to any aspect to which it might present itself to such as he." Hasn't this got to be "such as him"? Surely he couldn't have written it as: "present itself to he as and such as he"?
I'm well aware that the boy Dickens received little in the way of good formal education, but has there ever been a detailed critique of his grammar? He was clearly very much alive to 'lower class' errors (grammar, malapropisms etc) to give flavour to such characters, so he might be thought to set the bar high for his own authorial voice!
On a more minor point, IIRC throughout David Copperfield' Mr Peggoty's direct speech has 'trew' as the spelling for 'true'. To me there's no difference in pronunciation so it seems a pointless distinction. Was there in Dickens's time?I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur View Post"The proud, undaunted face... indifferent to any aspect to which it might present itself to such as he." Hasn't this got to be "such as him"?
.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View PostIt could be analyzed as a compressed form of"... present itself to such [a person] as he [is]."
.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostIn today's York Press:
The Black Sheep Brewing Company Limited has closed the Last Drop Inn in Colliergate, though it is other city pub, the Three Legged Mare in High Petergate, remains open.
I guess one and a half cheers for not using the apostrophe.
Comment
-
Comment