Originally posted by vinteuil
View Post
Pedants' Paradise
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Beef Oven
I hope this is the correct thread for my query. It concerns the word 'plethora'.
Years ago, my English master told us that a common mistake with this word is to precede it with 'a'. This made sense to me, after all, we wouldn't say 'an anathema'.
I rarely come across the word, but while watching the Panorama 'Cash For Questions' special last night, a document was focused on and read out and it contained "........a plethora of.....".
Was my English master wrong? Did I misunderstand him?
Is anyone up on this sort of thing, and can give a steer? It's actually beginning to affect my sleep.
Comment
-
In its original, medical sense of an excessive volume of blood...or excessive fullness of blood vessels (OED) you find it without 'a':
1575 J. Banister Needefull Treat. Chyrurg. f. 25, In curing these kyndes of Ulcers, the causes must first be diligently searched, to witte whether it be Plethora, Cacochymia, or Cachexia.
But the very next citation is
1659 W. Chamberlayne Pharonnida i. i. 15 Flowd to a dangerous Plethora, or where Some Cause occult the Humours did prepare For that malignant Ill.
All the OED's more general modern examples have a or the, so I think your English master was wrong. Or you misunderstood him.
Comment
-
-
I believe he was; the O.E.D. has it singular: a piece of mediæval Latin "plethora," which in turn comes from the Greek plethore (fullness, repletion).
Marryat wrote in 1835: "We are suffering under a plethora of capital."
and in 1868 Farrar complained about "A plethora of words."
It is certainly not unknown for an English master to err. I still remember my own (when I was only about eight) telling us that "gaol" and "goal" were spelled the same way. When I piped up and contradicted him he flew into a fury and administered "the strap" to me in front of the class - terrifying at that age. My father subsequently accused him of being a communist.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostIn its original, medical sense of an excessive volume of blood...or excessive fullness of blood vessels (OED) you find it without 'a':
1575 J. Banister Needefull Treat. Chyrurg. f. 25, In curing these kyndes of Ulcers, the causes must first be diligently searched, to witte whether it be Plethora, Cacochymia, or Cachexia.
But the very next citation is
1659 W. Chamberlayne Pharonnida i. i. 15 Flowd to a dangerous Plethora, or where Some Cause occult the Humours did prepare For that malignant Ill.
All the OED's more general modern examples have a or the, so I think your English master was wrong. Or you misunderstood him.
Comment
-
-
Beef Oven
Originally posted by Sydney Grew View PostI believe he was; the O.E.D. has it singular: a piece of mediæval Latin "plethora," which in turn comes from the Greek plethore (fullness, repletion).
Marryat wrote in 1835: "We are suffering under a plethora of capital."
and in 1868 Farrar complained about "A plethora of words."
It is certainly not unknown for an English master to err. I still remember my own (when I was only about eight) telling us that "gaol" and "goal" were spelled the same way. When I piped up and contradicted him he flew into a fury and administered "the strap" to me in front of the class - terrifying at that age. My father subsequently accused him of being a communist.
Although your strapping must have been traumatic (been there myself courtesy of an old skool schooling), the way you put your father's response is hilarious
Comment
-
Beef Oven
Originally posted by jean View PostIn its original, medical sense of an excessive volume of blood...or excessive fullness of blood vessels (OED) you find it without 'a':
1575 J. Banister Needefull Treat. Chyrurg. f. 25, In curing these kyndes of Ulcers, the causes must first be diligently searched, to witte whether it be Plethora, Cacochymia, or Cachexia.
But the very next citation is
1659 W. Chamberlayne Pharonnida i. i. 15 Flowd to a dangerous Plethora, or where Some Cause occult the Humours did prepare For that malignant Ill.
All the OED's more general modern examples have a or the, so I think your English master was wrong. Or you misunderstood him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mercia View PostI've always thought anathema a strange word. What is it ? a noun? an adjective ?
But though the presence of an artilce is a good indication that it's a noun you're dealing with, its absence doesn't disprove that theory.
Quite a few nouns are commonly used without articles - poison just sprang to mind.
my online thesaurus gives hate as a synonym whereas I would have thought it was hateful
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mercia View PostI've always thought anathema a strange word. What is it ? a noun? an adjective ? my online thesaurus gives hate as a synonym whereas I would have thought it was hateful
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mercia View Post
Comment
-
Comment