Pedants' Paradise

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gradus
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 5601

    There's a kick-off but does there have to be a score-line.

    Comment

    • Padraig
      Full Member
      • Feb 2013
      • 4220

      I have noticed an increase in the number of times I have heard the word 'huge' mispronounced, though I would not say a shuge number.

      Comment

      • Bryn
        Banned
        • Mar 2007
        • 24688

        "There are no results that meet this criteria.​"

        Error message in response to a search failure on this very forum.

        Comment

        • kernelbogey
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 5735

          Originally posted by Bryn View Post
          "There are no results that meet this criteria.​"

          Error message in response to a search failure on this very forum.
          Ain't no such critters.

          Comment

          • french frank
            Administrator/Moderator
            • Feb 2007
            • 30205

            Originally posted by Bryn View Post
            "There are no results that meet this criteria.​"

            Error message in response to a search failure on this very forum.
            The company software we used would come up with: One errors.

            Meanwhile, back to the BBC website's gradual americanisation: "Farmer LlÅ·r Jones said his sheepdog Patsy dove into flooded fields to rescue part of his flock."

            Reference sources suggest 'dove' is most usual in N. America, 'dived' elsewhere. On the odd occasion when I've heard 'dove' I imagined it was being used jocularly.
            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

            Comment

            • smittims
              Full Member
              • Aug 2022
              • 4034

              And of course dove often crops up in opera libretti. 'Dove Son! Crudele , ma dove?'

              Comment

              • Bryn
                Banned
                • Mar 2007
                • 24688

                Originally posted by french frank View Post

                The company software we used would come up with: One errors.

                Meanwhile, back to the BBC website's gradual americanisation: "Farmer LlÅ·r Jones said his sheepdog Patsy dove into flooded fields to rescue part of his flock."

                Reference sources suggest 'dove' is most usual in N. America, 'dived' elsewhere. On the odd occasion when I've heard 'dove' I imagined it was being used jocularly.
                A somewhat fuller (more fuil ) story of the evolution: https://www.merriam-webster.com/gram...ich-is-correct

                Comment

                • french frank
                  Administrator/Moderator
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 30205

                  Originally posted by Bryn View Post

                  A somewhat fuller (more fuil ) story of the evolution: https://www.merriam-webster.com/gram...ich-is-correct
                  Yes, I'd been mentally going through the alphabet for analogies (bive, cive, dive, five, give, hive &c) and concluded that the similarity with drive had been the driver of change. Strive/strove seems to have had a longer, probably precisely etymological, history. I hesitated (and still do) between thrived and throve ... no, I think I would say thrived.

                  That said, I would have expected irregular forms to be come regular, not vice versa: drive, drived; dive, dived. Language is soooo arbitrary. So of course every usage is 'right' but some give rise to misunderstandings, some don't.
                  It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                  Comment

                  • Bryn
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2007
                    • 24688

                    Originally posted by french frank View Post

                    Yes, I'd been mentally going through the alphabet for analogies (bive, cive, dive, five, give, hive &c) and concluded that the similarity with drive had been the driver of change. Strive/strove seems to have had a longer, probably precisely etymological, history. I hesitated (and still do) between thrived and throve ... no, I think I would say thrived.

                    That said, I would have expected irregular forms to be come regular, not vice versa: drive, drived; dive, dived. Language is soooo arbitrary. So of course every usage is 'right' but some give rise to misunderstandings, some don't.
                    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dic...nglish/thriven

                    Comment

                    • french frank
                      Administrator/Moderator
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 30205

                      Yes, thriven is the past participle, like drive - drove - driven. Thrive - throve/thrived - thriven (also strive). Dived - dived/dove - ?? diven?? So 'to dive' is not like 'to drive' but the grammatical difference is lost on most people in matters of everyday usage. It's the first thing that comes into one's head.
                      It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                      Comment

                      • vinteuil
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 12765

                        Originally posted by french frank View Post

                        That said, I would have expected irregular forms to be come regular, not vice versa: drive, drived; dive, dived. Language is soooo arbitrary. So of course every usage is 'right' but some give rise to misunderstandings, some don't.
                        And many think that 'wrought' is a past tense of 'wreak' - whereas the past of wreak is wreaked : wrought the past of work. But also see -



                        ... I still enjoy using inappropriate strong forms of English verbs - 'an avenue of plaught lime trees', 'he raught out to me in my time of need', 'a pair of blaught linen trousers' &c

                        .
                        Last edited by vinteuil; 22-10-23, 10:54.

                        Comment

                        • gurnemanz
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 7379

                          Originally posted by french frank View Post

                          Yes, I'd been mentally going through the alphabet for analogies (bive, cive, dive, five, give, hive &c) and concluded that the similarity with drive had been the driver of change. Strive/strove seems to have had a longer, probably precisely etymological, history. I hesitated (and still do) between thrived and throve ... no, I think I would say thrived.

                          That said, I would have expected irregular forms to be come regular, not vice versa: drive, drived; dive, dived. Language is soooo arbitrary. So of course every usage is 'right' but some give rise to misunderstandings, some don't.
                          You started me off comparing - ive verbs with German cognates, which end in -eben. I think they were all originally irregular and have generally been in transition towards regularity over the centuries. This transition varies between English and German is still going on with options still available in some cases as with dived/dove.

                          strive - irreg or reg (strived/strove)
                          streben - now only reg

                          give - only irreg
                          geben - only irreg

                          German -eben verbs sometimes come to be spelt (spelled?) -eave in English:

                          heave - irreg or reg,heaved/hove https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/heave
                          heben (to lift) only irreg (hob)

                          weave - mainly irreg wove. weaved?
                          weben - irreg or reg (wob/webte)

                          cleave - very mixed up (clove, cleft, cleaved https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cleave)
                          kleben - only reg (klebte)

                          It seems that the more common a verb is in everyday use the more likely it is to retain the irregular form (give/geben being a case in point).

                          Comment

                          • Bryn
                            Banned
                            • Mar 2007
                            • 24688

                            Originally posted by vinteuil View Post

                            And many think that 'wrought' is a past tense of 'wreak' - whereas the past of wreak is wreaked : wrought the past of work. But also see -

                            https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/wrought#:~:text=As%20a%20verb%2C%20wrought%20is,ev en%20here%2C%20wrought%20is%20etymologically

                            ... I still enjoy using inappropriate strong forms of English verbs - 'an avenue of plaught lime trees', 'he raught out to me in my time of need', 'a pair of blaught linen trousers' &c

                            .
                            wrought | American Dictionary




                            wrought

                            us
                            /rɔt/

                            wrought (CAUSED)

                            . . .

                            past simple and past participle of wreak
                            from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dic...nglish/wrought









                            ​

                            Comment

                            • french frank
                              Administrator/Moderator
                              • Feb 2007
                              • 30205

                              Originally posted by gurnemanz View Post
                              You started me off comparing - ive verbs with German cognates, which end in -eben. I think they were all originally irregular and have generally been in transition towards regularity over the centuries.
                              Interesting. I knew most of our irregular verbs were the Germans' fault! Well, seriously, it is fascinating to see how irregularities arise in one language in the first place and how they regularise. The Romans often got things wrong too! And the French!
                              It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                              Comment

                              • vinteuil
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 12765

                                Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                                ... well how wrong they are! (Well, it's the East Anglia Polytechnic, innit - whatchew especk?)
                                Last edited by vinteuil; 22-10-23, 12:47.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X