If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
My old OED has quotes back to 1000 AD - "Se æppel næfre thæs feorr ne trendeth, he cyth, hwanon he com", and many subsequent references from the 14th, 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries.
The OED quotations for "trend" as a noun are much more recent - 17th, 18th, 19th cent.
Not only banana-skinned, but carpet-pulled to boot.
Mangerton did suggest that it might be a mis-print for 'wended', but I'm not sure that I'm convinced by that idea. I'd need to check in another edition.
I've been banana-skinned! (I bet that's not in Rider Haggard ).
I think that the specific use of 'to trend' in an absolute sense is new. If a Twitter topic 'trends', doesn't that imply quantity (more than direction) as well as being found on an increasing number of Twitter pages?
It looks to me as if there was a development: to trend (vb intrans, rarely absol., mostly obsolete in the sense of turning round/revolving) > trend (noun, prevailing direction, late 1884) > trend (verb absol.).
In other words, the original sense of the verb is now obsolete; the noun appeared in the 19th c.; and the current usage is very modern. Unless it has the sense of a topic that is going round and round ('doing the rounds').
Perhaps?
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Mangerton did suggest that it might be a mis-print for 'wended', but I'm not sure that I'm convinced by that idea. I'd need to check in another edition.
I must come clean and say that my tongue was rather in my cheek when I wrote that.
As I said up-thread () I recently found 'trended' in Haggard's King Solomon's Mines (pub. c. 1895) - "the road trended to the left".
You've got yourself a duff copy there Candyfloss, old chum - perhaps a version adapted for kids? The text (from start of Ch VIII; "We Enter Kukuanaland") in the magisterial Penguin edition is: "All that afternoon we travelled on along the magnificent roadway, which headed (sic) steadily in a north-westerly direction."
You've got yourself a duff copy there Candyfloss, old chum - perhaps a version adapted for kids? The text (from start of Ch VIII; "We Enter Kukuanaland") in the magisterial Penguin edition is: "All that afternoon we travelled on along the magnificent roadway, which headed (sic) steadily in a north-westerly direction."
... hmmm. My copy has -
"All that afternoon we travelled along the magnificent roadway, which trended steadily in a north-westerly direction. Infadoos and Scragga walked with us, but their followers marched about one hundred paces ahead.
"Infadoos," I said at length, "who made this road?" .... "
And on the principle of lectio difficilior, I wd suggest it more likely that 'trended' was altered to 'headed' rather than the other way about...
You've got yourself a duff copy there Candyfloss, old chum - perhaps a version adapted for kids? The text (from start of Ch VIII; "We Enter Kukuanaland") in the magisterial Penguin edition is: "All that afternoon we travelled on along the magnificent roadway, which headed (sic) steadily in a north-westerly direction."
We've all heard of a King penguin and an Emperor penguin but ... surely not
You've got yourself a duff copy there Candyfloss, old chum - perhaps a version adapted for kids? The text (from start of Ch VIII; "We Enter Kukuanaland") in the magisterial Penguin edition is: "All that afternoon we travelled on along the magnificent roadway, which headed (sic) steadily in a north-westerly direction."
As I borrowed it from the library (you don't think I'd buy stuff like that, do you ?) I can't check the publisher or the edition.
Comment