Pedants' Paradise

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sir Velo
    Full Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 3225

    Originally posted by Old Grumpy View Post
    Signs round here (happen, Yorkshire): Warning. Free range children!
    That sign is rapidly becoming obsolete as the prospect of seeing children playing outside anywhere is a thing of the past.

    Comment

    • LMcD
      Full Member
      • Sep 2017
      • 8396

      Originally posted by Sir Velo View Post
      That sign is rapidly becoming obsolete as the prospect of seeing children playing outside anywhere is a thing of the past.
      ... and replaced by one asking parents - well, those who insist on driving their children to and from school - NOT TO IDLE.

      Comment

      • cat
        Full Member
        • May 2019
        • 396

        Originally posted by Sir Velo View Post
        That sign is rapidly becoming obsolete as the prospect of seeing children playing outside anywhere is a thing of the past.
        Surely the more unlikely it is to encounter children playing outside, the greater the need for such a sign? This is why you might occasionally see a sign on a dual carriageway warning of pedestrians crossing ahead, but you don't see those signs everywhere in town centres.
        Last edited by cat; 05-12-21, 10:17.

        Comment

        • oddoneout
          Full Member
          • Nov 2015
          • 9139

          "calcifying my view..." I've seen this a couple of times recently to mean strengthen - but why? Yes, something that's calcified is hardened but I still think it's an odd choice. Such is the world of modern "journalism" that I have no doubt it will spread as the desire to sound a little different over-rides the small step of looking up a meaning.

          Comment

          • cat
            Full Member
            • May 2019
            • 396

            Originally posted by oddoneout View Post
            "calcifying my view..." I've seen this a couple of times recently to mean strengthen - but why? Yes, something that's calcified is hardened but I still think it's an odd choice. Such is the world of modern "journalism" that I have no doubt it will spread as the desire to sound a little different over-rides the small step of looking up a meaning.
            It could be a better word to use than "strengthen" if you mean "make less amenable to change".

            A "strong" view is perhaps one held passionately or earnestly, not necessarily with strong roots.

            This is how languages evolves. If there was nothing to be gained in sometimes using "calcifying" instead of "strengthening", then it wouldn't catch on.

            Comment

            • Serial_Apologist
              Full Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 37576

              Originally posted by cat View Post
              Surely the more unlikely it is to encounter children playing outside, the greater the need for such a sign? This is why you might occasionally see a sign on a dual carriageway warning of pedestrians crossing ahead, but you don't see those signs everywhere in town centres.
              One such sign might read "CONGEALED ENTRANCE AHEAD"!

              Comment

              • cat
                Full Member
                • May 2019
                • 396

                Various local NHS organizations are posting on social media inviting people to "pre-book" their booster appointments.

                Dictionaries ridiculously tell me that a pre-booking is a booking made in advance, that a booking is a reservation made in advance, and that a reservation is something that has been booked in advance.

                I could understand if "pre-booking" had come to mean a tentative, unconfirmed booking, a way of holding the booking slot until an actual booking was made. However that's not what people are using it for: "pre-book" is simply used in place of "book" and I can't see why.

                Comment

                • Bryn
                  Banned
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 24688

                  Originally posted by cat View Post
                  Various local NHS organizations are posting on social media inviting people to "pre-book" their booster appointments.

                  Dictionaries ridiculously tell me that a pre-booking is a booking made in advance, that a booking is a reservation made in advance, and that a reservation is something that has been booked in advance.

                  I could understand if "pre-booking" had come to mean a tentative, unconfirmed booking, a way of holding the booking slot until an actual booking was made. However that's not what people are using it for: "pre-book" is simply used in place of "book" and I can't see why.
                  I can see a use for "re-book" where a standard date is set, before which the general public may not book but those with certain privileges, possibly associated with membership of a support group, may book ahead of heat date. A similar rationale applies to "pre-order" with regard to CDs.

                  Comment

                  • kernelbogey
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 5735

                    Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                    I can see a use for "re-book" where a standard date is set, before which the general public may not book but those with certain privileges, possibly associated with membership of a support group, may book ahead of heat date. A similar rationale applies to "pre-order" with regard to CDs.
                    A cookery writer once wrote that she had never succeeded in 'pre-heating' her oven, only ever heating it.

                    Comment

                    • oddoneout
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2015
                      • 9139

                      Originally posted by cat View Post
                      Various local NHS organizations are posting on social media inviting people to "pre-book" their booster appointments.

                      Dictionaries ridiculously tell me that a pre-booking is a booking made in advance, that a booking is a reservation made in advance, and that a reservation is something that has been booked in advance.

                      I could understand if "pre-booking" had come to mean a tentative, unconfirmed booking, a way of holding the booking slot until an actual booking was made. However that's not what people are using it for: "pre-book" is simply used in place of "book" and I can't see why.
                      My understanding is it's to do with not being able to book appointments unless or until you have reached whatever qualifying date/age /cohort, which didn't matter too much if appointments were then available as soon as that point was reached, but wasn't the case for a great many folk. The pre-booking set-up means that you can book an appointment ahead (within certain limits) in readiness for the date on which you qualify. I'm not sure how well it's working out in practice,as when the 5 month booking interval was first announced I tried several times to go through the online system to get a slot at a walk-in centre in town I'd just found out about, but was ruled out at almost the first question as I hadn't (surprise surprise) reached the 6 month since 2nd jab qualifier. Possibly the old story of government announcing changes ahead of having allowed the system to update and enable them. I'll try again next week when I will have more than reached the relevant interval.
                      So it's a booking made in advance of the date you would otherwise be allowed to do. Clumsy - and has led to a great deal of confusion, and added unpleasantness for those on the front line having to explain it.
                      I assume part of the rationale is to be able to ensure vaccine supplies in good time - it gives a longer lead time.

                      Comment

                      • oddoneout
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2015
                        • 9139

                        Originally posted by kernelbogey View Post
                        A cookery writer once wrote that she had never succeeded in 'pre-heating' her oven, only ever heating it.
                        True - but for some recipes you need to have the oven at the right temperature as soon as the dish goes in so getting it up to heat ahead of time - pre-heating - makes sense as a term to my way of thinking. What these days doesn't make sense is that there doesn't seem to have been any revision of the times involved nor that it's not always necessary with oven technology having moved on somewhat since the 1930s...

                        Comment

                        • Serial_Apologist
                          Full Member
                          • Dec 2010
                          • 37576

                          Originally posted by oddoneout View Post
                          True - but for some recipes you need to have the oven at the right temperature as soon as the dish goes in so getting it up to heat ahead of time - pre-heating - makes sense as a term to my way of thinking. What these days doesn't make sense is that there doesn't seem to have been any revision of the times involved nor that it's not always necessary with oven technology having moved on somewhat since the 1930s...
                          Food manufacturers would have to take account of lapsed technology, my own cooker being a prime example.

                          Comment

                          • kernelbogey
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 5735

                            Originally posted by oddoneout View Post
                            True - but for some recipes you need to have the oven at the right temperature as soon as the dish goes in so getting it up to heat ahead of time - pre-heating - makes sense as a term to my way of thinking. What these days doesn't make sense is that there doesn't seem to have been any revision of the times involved nor that it's not always necessary with oven technology having moved on somewhat since the 1930s...
                            So, two alternative instructions:

                            1) Preheat the oven to 175 degrees C.
                            2) Heat the oven to 175 degrees C.

                            Is (1) any clearer than (2)?

                            Comment

                            • oddoneout
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2015
                              • 9139

                              Originally posted by kernelbogey View Post
                              So, two alternative instructions:

                              1) Preheat the oven to 175 degrees C.
                              2) Heat the oven to 175 degrees C.

                              Is (1) any clearer than (2)?
                              Dunno, but when I'm copying out or passing on recipes I just put the oven temp, not least because the preparation stages will take different lengths of time according to ability, familiarity, how the work is planned, so saying to put it on as the first step isn't necessarily helpful. - and could be seen as expensive and environmentally undesirable...
                              Your example has reminded me that now a single temperature is the norm, whereas many of my recipes have 2 (C and F), many have a gas setting rather than temperature for gas ovens, and some even have suggestions for the likes of solid fuel appliances (a Farmers Weekly collection from 1920s to WW2).

                              Comment

                              • Padraig
                                Full Member
                                • Feb 2013
                                • 4224

                                Originally posted by kernelbogey View Post
                                So, two alternative instructions:

                                1) Preheat the oven to 175 degrees C.
                                2) Heat the oven to 175 degrees C.

                                Is (1) any clearer than (2)?
                                (1) is clearer than (2).

                                (1) is more a warning not to start cooking until the temperature is reached, e.g, a raising agent will fail if baking starts too soon. That's my experience, but please yourself.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X