Originally posted by Bryn
View Post
Pedants' Paradise
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by teamsaint View PostAnd as far south and East as Westbury , Wilts.Money can't buy you happiness............but it does bring you a more pleasant form of misery - Spike Milligan
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Zucchini View PostWhy don't you make the Honourable Member for the 18th Century your President?
https://www.itv.com/news/2019-07-26/...uide-to-staff/
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Zucchini View PostWhy don't you make the Honourable Member for the 18th Century your President?
https://www.itv.com/news/2019-07-26/...uide-to-staff/
He would be very upset (or perhaps delighted?) here in Scotland where 'gotten' (archaic, not American) is still in everyday use. Even better is the wonderful 'I should have went...'
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LezLee View PostI agree with 5 of his banned words/phrases!
He would be very upset (or perhaps delighted?) here in Scotland where 'gotten' (archaic, not American) is still in everyday use. Even better is the wonderful 'I should have went...'Money can't buy you happiness............but it does bring you a more pleasant form of misery - Spike Milligan
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LezLee View PostI agree with 5 of his banned words/phrases!
He would be very upset (or perhaps delighted?) here in Scotland where 'gotten' (archaic, not American) is still in everyday use. Even better is the wonderful 'I should have went...'
- Very. No doubt overused but surely indispensable sometimes, particularly if in contrast with a previous non-superlative utterance.
- Due to. Perfectly correct after the verb 'to be', as in 'Unemployment is always due to government inefficiency'. But not correct, in my schooldays at least, in 'Due to government inefficiency, unemployment is rising' - should be 'Owing to'.
- Ongoing. OK, much overused.
- Hopefully. 'To travel hopefully is better than to arrive' but not 'Hopefully, travelling will be better than arriving'.
- Unacceptable. Many things are unacceptable, sir, but you probably won't agree with me on which!
- Equal. Words fail me! Does he need education on the meaning and political resonance of the word? Very probably
- Too may 'I's. Agreed. A fault I (myself) am prone to
- Yourself. Often used when 'you' is all that's needed. But stupid to ban it outright.
- Lot. OK, often slackly used (but such is a grammarian's lot)
- Got. Overused but has its uses.
- Speculate. We mustn't have people speculating, except possibly to accumulate!
- Invest (in schools). Kinda says it all, clearly a No-No with this government.
- No longer fit for purpose. An overused phrase, one best confined to its proper origin, and precise meaning, in sale of goods law.
- Ascertain. Perfectly good word surely? Is it being overused?
- Disappointment. Why?
- I note/ understand your concerns. Is this because the new regime is now determined not to acknowledge the validity of any objections to its policy? For instant dismissal as a civil servant, how about the double whammie, 'I understand your disappointment'?
- I am pleased to learn. This government is not going to be pleased to learn anything?
- Meet with. The 'with' is often redundant, but a total ban may meet with perfectly valid objections
Good comment below the list: "These are the list of words JR-M deems 'No longer fit for purpose'", but his insistence on imperial units of measurement is just beneath contempt! Should go down well in Europe thoughI keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostWhy does he object to a comma after the word and?
I despise most politicians: Johnson, Corbyn, and, of course, The Member for the Eighteenth Century.
Perfectly good sentence, with a comma after and.I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
Comment
-
-
Perhaps he meant the infamous 'Oxford comma' but actually made a mistake. If he did, he should have said BEFORE the 'and' as in:
'a comma placed immediately before the coordinating conjunction (usually and or or) in a series of three or more terms. For example, a list of three countries might be punctuated either as "France, Italy, and Spain" (with the serial comma), or as "France, Italy and Spain" (without the serial comma).'
Comment
-
Comment