Pedants' Paradise

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jean
    Late member
    • Nov 2010
    • 7100

    Someone should have told that Edward Fitzgerald.

    Myself when young did eagerly frequent
    Doctor and Saint, and heard great Argument
    About it and about: but evermore
    Came out by the same Door as in I went.

    Comment

    • french frank
      Administrator/Moderator
      • Feb 2007
      • 30209

      Originally posted by jean View Post
      Someone should have told that Edward Fitzgerald.
      I remember one of the Beatles (John? Paul?) explaining seriously that when writing lyrics you should avoid adding words just to make the line scan (viz. 'For I do think').

      Though I do think there is a shade of difference there: 'Myself when young' as the title of a painting, for example, to avoid a slightly jarring ( ) 'Me when young'. It's the 'Myself and my wife' that seems, erm, a little odd …
      It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

      Comment

      • jean
        Late member
        • Nov 2010
        • 7100

        Originally posted by french frank View Post
        ...when writing lyrics you should avoid adding words just to make the line scan...
        Someone should have told that William Shakespeare.

        1594 Shakespeare Titus Andronicus iv. iv. 74 My selfe hath often heard them say,..That Lucius banishment was wrongfullie.

        a1616 Shakespeare Julius Caesar (1623) iv. ii. 223 My selfe haue Letters of the selfe-same Tenure.

        Comment

        • jean
          Late member
          • Nov 2010
          • 7100

          Originally posted by french frank View Post
          ...It's the 'Myself and my wife' that seems, erm, a little odd …
          1682 J. Bunyan Holy War 155 Both they and my self are guilty of great transgressions.

          1850 Ladies' Repository Dec. 386/1 Myself and reader are bound for Kennebunkport.

          1904 W. B. Yeats Let. 16 Apr. (1994) III. 582 Miss Horniman, the architect & myself were inspecting the theatre.

          Comment

          • vinteuil
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 12767

            Originally posted by gurnemanz View Post
            Coincidentally, a PS to above: Just listened to poet, Owen Sheers, on Private Passions, referring to "how myself and my wife met".
            ... I think Owen Sheers is also a Welsh speaker. Could any of our Welsh-speaking forumistas advise whether this by any chance reflects a Welsh turn of phrase?

            Comment

            • Bryn
              Banned
              • Mar 2007
              • 24688

              Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
              ... I think Owen Sheers is also a Welsh speaker. Could any of our Welsh-speaking forumistas advise whether this by any chance reflects a Welsh turn of phrase?
              Indeed, where are the Welsh-speakers to?

              Comment

              • jean
                Late member
                • Nov 2010
                • 7100

                The OED doesn't mention Welsh, but notes the use of myself 'As part of a compound subject or predicate... Also (chiefly Irish English) as simple predicate.'

                1918 ‘B. MacNamara’ Valley of Squinting Windows 177 But sure it was myself that could not blame him at all.

                Comment

                • ahinton
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 16122

                  It might be a very short haul from questionable uses of "myself" to those of "my selfie", I hate to have to imagine...

                  Pedantic? Moi(self)?

                  Somehow, certain uses of "myself" seem potentially suggestive of the notion of "my self" as distinct from any other part of me, though what that might or might not tell any of us here is open to question...

                  Comment

                  • french frank
                    Administrator/Moderator
                    • Feb 2007
                    • 30209

                    (Myself) I'd go more readily with the regional explanation (esp. where there is an underlying different language) than sundry quotations from the 17 th century.
                    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                    Comment

                    • jean
                      Late member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 7100

                      Usage is usage, whether legitimised by an 'underlying different language' or not!

                      Comment

                      • french frank
                        Administrator/Moderator
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 30209

                        Originally posted by jean View Post
                        Usage is usage, whether legitimised by an 'underlying different language' or not!
                        Well, yes. The point being that usage in the 17 thc. isn't necessarily usage in the 21st c. So the examples are examples of usage in the 17 th c. (when it may have been more common than now and not particularly odd, or tinged now, perhaps, with usage from other languages).
                        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                        Comment

                        • Padraig
                          Full Member
                          • Feb 2013
                          • 4220

                          Originally posted by french frank View Post
                          (Myself) I'd go more readily with the regional explanation
                          perfect use of the idiom, f f . No need for the brackets.

                          Comment

                          • french frank
                            Administrator/Moderator
                            • Feb 2007
                            • 30209

                            Originally posted by Padraig View Post
                            perfect use of the idiom, f f . No need for the brackets.
                            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                            Comment

                            • jean
                              Late member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 7100

                              Originally posted by french frank View Post
                              Well, yes. The point being that usage in the 17 thc. isn't necessarily usage in the 21st c...
                              But the reasons usually given for why something is 'wrong' now would obtain just as much in the C17 - and I gave quotations from the C19 and C20 too, so there's an unbroken line of succession to be traced, which makes it difficult to pinpoint exactly when wrongness entered the frame in rthis case.

                              Comment

                              • Eine Alpensinfonie
                                Host
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 20569

                                Originally posted by french frank View Post
                                I remember one of the Beatles (John? Paul?) explaining seriously that when writing lyrics you should avoid adding words just to make the line scan
                                That's exactly what rappers do - the superfluous fill-ins being swear words.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X