Pedants' Paradise

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Roehre

    Originally posted by ardcarp View Post
    ...sounds like pretentiousness on the part of whoever posts up the blurb on the website. Dona eis requiem surely translates as 'give them peace', so if 'requiem' is a noun meaning 'peace', you surely can't have 'peaces'. If a Requiem has come to mean a piece of music honouring [?] the dead, then in English, Requiems must surely be the plural. Come on, Jean, expand on your 'No!'
    The noun Requiem stems from the first words of the Introitus of the Requiem Mass: Requiem aeternam (= eternal peace).
    It's an accusative here, the nominative is Requies (like in Berio's work of that name in Memorian Cathy Berberian)
    Last edited by Guest; 05-12-14, 23:23. Reason: typo

    Comment

    • ardcarp
      Late member
      • Nov 2010
      • 11102

      Quite agree. My dona eis requiem sees it in the accusative too. But we're talking about plural forms here, not case.

      Comment

      • jean
        Late member
        • Nov 2010
        • 7100

        I was so shocked I had to go and lie down for a bit.

        The plural even for the noun requies in a non-liturgical context doesn't occur. If it did, it wouldn't be requiae, because requies is third declension. There's no such word as requiae.

        I don't know when people started to use the single word as a shorthand title for the Mass or how they did the plural, but it wasn't Missae da requiem - there's no preposition da in Latin. In the Roman Missal these masses are called Missae in commemoratione omnium fidelium defunctorum.

        Comment

        • Beef Oven!
          Ex-member
          • Sep 2013
          • 18147

          I couldn't believe it either - spilt my can of Skol all over me Doner Kebab!

          Comment

          • jean
            Late member
            • Nov 2010
            • 7100

            Originally posted by ardcarp View Post
            But we're talking about plural forms here, not case.
            We have to talk about case though; it's accusative because in both the examples it's the object of a verb, but once you've wrenched it from its context, it has no reason to be in the accusative. It isn't really a Latin word any more.

            .
            Last edited by jean; 05-12-14, 23:54.

            Comment

            • kea
              Full Member
              • Dec 2013
              • 749

              John Zorn's Aporias is subtitled Requia for piano and orchestra. I don't think that's the correct plural either, but I'm not sure what is (apart from 'Requiems' of course, and even that's rather colloquial).

              Comment

              • jean
                Late member
                • Nov 2010
                • 7100

                The word is first found in English in the fourteenth century I find. Early examples are usually in the form Mass of requiem. The OED doesn't give any plural examples until the mid-C19, by which time I suppose people were beginning to appraise different settings of the text.

                Comment

                • Despina dello Stagno
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2012
                  • 84

                  Originally posted by doversoul View Post
                  Tomorrow’s CD Review:

                  11.20am New Releases: Requiae
                  With Andrew McGregor. Including Building a Library: Bach: Orchestral Suites, BWV1066-1069.


                  Maybe I should post this on the Pedants’ Paradise but is requiae plural of requiem?
                  I don't think that anyone could produce such gibberish spontaneously.
                  I think that it is perhaps an inadvertent garblement of "Reliquae", or the rest, where the rest just happen to be requiems.

                  Comment

                  • french frank
                    Administrator/Moderator
                    • Feb 2007
                    • 30456

                    I'll move this to the Pedantry thread when the programme has finished, but:

                    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Requia Here, Requia appears to be the plural of Requiem (=Requium?). So presumably Requiae is the (sort of 'correct') plural of the incorrect plural. Indicating a plural plural.
                    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                    Comment

                    • verismissimo
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 2957

                      If there was not such a word before, there may well be now, if it's picked up by others. Living thing, language. Even dead language.

                      Comment

                      • jean
                        Late member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 7100

                        Originally posted by french frank View Post
                        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Requia Here, Requia appears to be the plural of Requiem (=Requium?). So presumably Requiae is the (sort of 'correct') plural of the incorrect plural. Indicating a plural plural.
                        That looks like the explanation. I did wonder if someone had read requium for requiem, but to get requiae you need to go through the stage of reading the notional neuter plural requia as a first declension singular.

                        Originally posted by verismissimo View Post
                        If there was not such a word before, there may well be now...
                        Like the ersatz Italian verismissimo!

                        Comment

                        • verismissimo
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 2957

                          Originally posted by jean View Post
                          ... Like the ersatz Italian verismissimo!
                          Just like that, jean.

                          Comment

                          • french frank
                            Administrator/Moderator
                            • Feb 2007
                            • 30456

                            Originally posted by jean View Post
                            the [notional] neuter plural requia as a first declension singular.
                            A sort of analogy with opus - opera (pl) > opera (sg). I think there are Romance examples of n.pl > f.sg, but I can't think of one just at the moment.
                            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                            Comment

                            • BBMmk2
                              Late Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 20908

                              Originally posted by richardfinegold View Post
                              I'm dying to find out.
                              Rather rather deadin here! :)
                              Don’t cry for me
                              I go where music was born

                              J S Bach 1685-1750

                              Comment

                              • french frank
                                Administrator/Moderator
                                • Feb 2007
                                • 30456

                                Originally posted by french frank View Post
                                I think there are Romance examples of n.pl > f.sg, but I can't think of one just at the moment.
                                Velum, a sail, is often pl in Latin; so vela > la voile. Less understandably, pirum, pira > la poire. I believe the 'unsteadiness' began in Vulgar Latin ...
                                It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X