Pedants' Paradise

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jean
    Late member
    • Nov 2010
    • 7100

    Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
    So at what point do you throw out the grammar rule book entirely?
    There's no grammar rule book in the sense that you seem to think.

    The rules of grammar are no more than a codification of how the language is actually used.

    The rule you've just invented, which proscribes two unrelated verbs with no punctuation mark or noun between them, was never obeyed by the verbs come and go, as in the examples above. It's quite possible that the American examplepreserves an older BE usage, as is so often the case.

    Comment

    • MrGongGong
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 18357

      My daughter, who is now at University, was in the first tranche of students who did lituracy (sic) at primery skool
      the thing she sometimes struggles with as an undergraduate is writing , knowing the grammar etc isn't a problem
      but the whole learning English like this has been for her and her peers a bit of a disaster
      the same goes for "ICT" ........

      Comment

      • jean
        Late member
        • Nov 2010
        • 7100

        That's because what she needs is a course in Rhetoric, which was been missing from education about language for far too long in favour of a sterile clause analysis whose palpable uselessness led to its being thrown out without anything useful being brought in to replace it.

        Academic linguists have been exploring what they call Discourse Analysis for twwenty years at least now, and it's about time it filtered through to schools.

        If my generation of students coped so much better with writing, I'm convinced it was because we read so much more than anyone does now, and absorbed good practice without so much need for explicit teaching.

        Comment

        • french frank
          Administrator/Moderator
          • Feb 2007
          • 30448

          Originally posted by Pabmusic View Post
          It seems we may both be wrong. I've tried three sources, and all give Ralph as Old Norse, from Raðulfr, or Old English from Rædwulf, both meaning 'wolf counsel'!
          Yes, the original source is Old Norse, but I think the modern forms are from the Latinised version via French. It would be interesting to check the history of 'Radolphus' and 'Ralph', and the dates at which those forms first appeared. The 'ph' spelling clearly doesn't come from Old Norse.

          Many Germanic (and Celtic) names were Latinised (probably when they came to be written down in Latin documents) and were then adopted in the Latin form. In the earlier part of the Middle Ages, the Germanic/Norse influences took over from the Roman, but Latin continued to be the main written language. Carolus > Charles, Henricus > Henry, Ricardus > Richard, Ludovicus > Louis, Lewis - all Latinised German names, where the Latin form is not found among Romans.
          Last edited by french frank; 04-05-12, 11:33. Reason: Added another example
          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

          Comment

          • Pabmusic
            Full Member
            • May 2011
            • 5537

            Originally posted by jean View Post
            ...The rules of grammar are no more than a codification of how the language is actually used...
            Although my sympathies are firmly with your main point, there are rules of grammar, without which English doesn't work well. They are not the 'rules' that most people quote - most of those are artificial - but they do exist. Most are to do with syntax, because English is so very reliant on correct positioning of words, as we have abandoned different word endings almost entirely (look what fuss 'whom' can cause!). "The boy hits the girl" means something very different from "the girl hits the boy" and the only way you can make the meaning clear is to have subject and verb (the boy hits) before the object (the girl). This is more than a codification of a convention - the language has to be used that way if it is to make sense. There are quite a few rules like this, but native English speakers don't usually think of them as rules, because they seem so natural.

            Comment

            • Pabmusic
              Full Member
              • May 2011
              • 5537

              Originally posted by french frank View Post
              Yes, the original source is Old Norse, but I think the modern forms are from the Latinised version via French. It would be interesting to check the history of 'Radolphus' and 'Ralph', and the dates at which those forms first appeared. The 'ph' spelling clearly doesn't come from Old Norse.

              Many Germanic (and Celtic) names were Latinised (probably when they came to be written down in Latin documents) and were then adopted in the Latin form. In the earlier part of the Middle Ages, the Germanic/Norse influences took over from the Roman, but Latin continued to be the main written language. Carolus > Charles, Henricus > Henry, Ricardus > Richard - all Latinised German names, where the Latin form is not found among Romans.
              Yes, I agree; very interesting. Of course, variant pronunciations like RVW's 'Rafe' will often be out of personal taste or family tradition, anyway.

              Comment

              • Eine Alpensinfonie
                Host
                • Nov 2010
                • 20572

                I've never been in tune with grammar anarchists.

                But seriously, Jean, your own written English is impeccable.

                Comment

                • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                  Gone fishin'
                  • Sep 2011
                  • 30163

                  Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                  All the Ralphs I know or have known (and that's quite a few) sound the "l". Could this be a north-south divide?
                  Or is it generational? The changeover sometime in the thirty years between Vaughan Williams and Richardson?
                  [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                  Comment

                  • amateur51

                    Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                    Or is it generational? The changeover sometime in the thirty years between Vaughan Williams and Richardson?
                    But what about Ralph Fiennes and Ralph Little?

                    http://api.ning.com/files/jS20hb5V3T...es_6182671.jpg ===> Rafe

                    http://www.bbc.co.uk/threecounties/t...lph_rf_150.jpg ===> Ralph

                    Comment

                    • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                      Gone fishin'
                      • Sep 2011
                      • 30163

                      Good point, ammie: biggered if I know!
                      [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                      Comment

                      • Pabmusic
                        Full Member
                        • May 2011
                        • 5537

                        Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                        Good point, ammie: biggered if I know!
                        [sings]

                        You say eether and I say eyether,
                        You say neether and I say nyther,
                        Eether, eyether, neether, nyther,
                        Let's call the whole thing off!
                        You like potato and I like potahto,
                        You like tomato and I like tomahto,
                        Potato, potahto, tomato, tomahto!
                        Let's call the whole thing off!
                        But oh! If we call the whole thing off,
                        Then we must part.
                        And oh! If we ever part,
                        Then that might break my heart!

                        [oh! it's all getting too intense for me!]

                        Comment

                        • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                          Gone fishin'
                          • Sep 2011
                          • 30163

                          Originally posted by Pabmusic View Post
                          [oh! it's all getting too intense for me!]
                          [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                          Comment

                          • amateur51

                            Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                            Good point, ammie: biggered if I know!


                            S'ok fhg last time I saw french frank's Redacting Tuk-Tuk it was up on bricks and three lads were bowling the wheels downhill (Bristol's full of 'em!)

                            Comment

                            • Eine Alpensinfonie
                              Host
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 20572

                              Originally posted by amateur51 View Post


                              S'ok fhg last time I saw french frank's Redacting Tuk-Tuk it was up on bricks and three lads were bowling the wheels downhill (Bristol's full of 'em!)
                              Do we have an emoticon for "I didn't understand a word of that?" (The "doh" one was removed some time ago.)

                              Comment

                              • vinteuil
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 12927

                                Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                                All the Ralphs I know or have known (and that's quite a few) sound the "l". Could this be a north-south divide?
                                i think it's a clarss thing rather than a regional divide...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X