Originally posted by Beef Oven
View Post
The long boat game
Collapse
X
-
Panjandrum
-
Originally posted by Panjandrum View PostBy "open" I mean open to anyone who meets stringent entrance criteria. I don't know what your 'A' level grades were, teamsaint, but back in the day you needed 3 straight As at 'A' level to get in; or take an entrance exam. If you had those kind of grades, at least one of the colleges would find room for you. A read of Brideshead Revisited or A Question of Upbringing will provide ample evidence that those from humble backgrounds have always been admitted to Oxbridge, provided they had the academic potential.
make sure you look like this
Comment
-
-
Beef Oven
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostLike Prince Edward did you mean ?
(that's a joke by the way)
things like the Royal Family getting waved into Universities don't really help the argument that its meritocratic .............
Thinking about Music for a moment , Cambridge (for example) has a great department BUT it's a bit dull compared to some other institutions. Sandy Goehr is a wonderful man and a great thinker about music but very much in the mainstream. If THAT is what you want, great , and i've worked with some wonderful Cambridge Undergraduates , there are other areas of study for which this institution (like RAM etc ) would be useless at
What is a bit tiresome is the received wisdom that this (and the other) University are uniquely outstanding in everything, for every subject, all the time ........ suggesting otherwise seems to be seen as equating a 3rd in Golf Course studies from the University of Slough with a 1st in Theoretical Physics from Oxford ! which it clearly isn't !
Comment
-
Originally posted by Panjandrum View PostBy "open" I mean open to anyone who meets stringent entrance criteria. I don't know what your 'A' level grades were, teamsaint, but back in the day you needed 3 straight As at 'A' level to get in; or take an entrance exam. If you had those kind of grades, at least one of the colleges would find room for you. A read of Brideshead Revisited or A Question of Upbringing will provide ample evidence that those from "humble" backgrounds have always been admitted to Oxbridge, provided they had the academic potential.
Its the number overall that matters.
since you ask, I got good enough grades,at age 17(took them a year early, and they weren't A's) to be given a place at the LSE without interview.
I was encouraged to apply to Oxbridge, but didn't think It was for me.
I strongly suspect that around that time , late 70's, you didn't need straight A's for Oxbridge, since LSE was admitting on a lower than that.
(actually just remembered I think the entrance exam was compulsory then.).I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven View PostCome on GG, he's a prince for Godsakes! He's bound to get the odd nudge and wink here and there. It all balances itself out in the end. For example, I get my car serviced and MOTd for nothing through my connections. If a prince went there, they'd rob him blind Also, he's lost all his hair, he's only young. What would you rather have, a 2:2 from Cambridge or a full head of hair? Life is a wonderful thing and everything evens out along the way
you've obviously not seen what happened to Lemmy when he was booted out of Hawkwind ! (now Dave Brock didn't go to Oxford as far as I'm aware ?)
Comment
-
-
Beef Oven
Originally posted by teamsaint View Posta few have always got in.
Its the number overall that matters.
since you ask, I got good enough grades,at age 17(took them a year early, and they weren't A's) to be given a place at the LSE without interview.
I was encouraged to apply to Oxbridge, but didn't think It was for me.
I strongly suspect that around that time , late 70's, you didn't need straight A's for Oxbridge, since LSE was admitting on a lower than that.
P.S. this was 1978
Comment
-
Originally posted by Beef Oven View PostI did not apply to the LSE, but my best friend did. His offer was three Cs. By the by, he went to Bristol.
P.S. this was 1978
(my grades were better than your mate's so there !!)
Anyway, i think the point remains that in the late 70's, you didn't need straight A's for Oxbridge.
Also, what about those stats I linked to.
Surely worthy of comment ?I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostLike Prince Edward did you mean ?
(that's a joke by the way)
A number had the following appended in marker pen: TWO Cs AND A D TO PRINCES.
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Beef Oven
Originally posted by Caliban View PostI was around the relevant educational establishment when he was admitted. At around the same time, there was an evangelical Christian lecture or seminar series being promoted in posters all over the place saying WHAT DOES JESUS OFFER?
A number had the following appended in marker pen: TWO Cs AND A D TO PRINCES.
Comment
-
John Skelton
Originally posted by Beef Oven View PostI did not apply to the LSE, but my best friend did. His offer was three Cs. By the by, he went to Bristol.
P.S. this was 1978
And some way of recognising that highly intelligent candidates who don't go to schools with 90% or whatever it is university 'standard' grades are less likely to get the grades for admission to certain universities is what's needed, IMO. Instead the so-called 'elite' universities (including UCL) have their heads deep buried in the tuition fees trough, have spent their time lobbying for a removal of the tuition fees cap, and regard idealism as a rude word.
Comment
-
Resurrection Man
Well interesting to see that Fenton-Trenton has now deleted any form of negative comment on his Facebook page. Also all negative comments have been removed from his Twitter account. Any attempt to post a negative comment is blocked on both. Lastly, the one remaining avenue for dissent ..the Comments section of the Thoughts of Chairman Trenton blog..has been totally deleted.
So this is the brave new world that Fenton-Trenton is advocating. Total suppression of any form of dissent. Seem to have been here before. Stalin? Hitler? Assad?
Comment
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostWell, I applied for a research fellowship at Oxford (can't remember which college - Worcester?) and a University lectureship at Cambridge and was rebuffed by both. This could be interpreted in many ways ...
In spite of this, I'm very pro-Oxbridge for those it suits.
Comment
-
-
Resurrection Man
Comment