Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur
View Post
I was offered similar insurance when arranging a mortgage over thirty years ago, read the small print, considered it was virtually useless, and declined. I'm sure many others did exactly the same.
Almost every time I purchase on the internet I have to either tick or untick a box. I agree that an already ticked box requiring the purchaser to read the sale and conditions very carefully, and "unticking" if required, can be annoying and gives one some idea of the sort of company involved. A similar practice is the advertising of a 'lowest price' for a CD only to later discover you are being charged £10 for it to be sent by first class post. I tend to avoid companies like that for future transactions, just in case I have a bad day and stupidly sign up.
I'm certainly not defending these sort of 'sharp practices', simply astonished by the apparent thousands of 'victims' who have claimed they were 'conned' ( ie too lazy or stupid not to read the 'terms and conditions') of any purchase, and are now being 'compensated' for it.
Sometimes, muppets aside, any 'conning' can work the other way as well!
Comment