Originally posted by Beef Oven
View Post
Room 101 - what single aspect of modern life should be consigned to oblivion?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostThere are some interesting examples in Bill Bryson's "Made in America" about how several spellings and phrases that we think of as "Americanisms" are in fact relics of older English usage .....
I like one in a letter from August Jaeger ('Nimrod') to Elgar, from the 1890s, where he's trying to lift Elgar's spirits and talks about "a day's attack of the blues".
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jean View PostBut there is a zeta in Greek, and that's where all these -ize words ultimately come from.
They were spelled with s in French, which is the route by which most of them came to us. But of course there are many English words that were never Greek at all, like surprise. So the easiest thing seems to be to spell them all -ise.
The one that really irritates me is the American spelling analyze, because although the noun analysis is Greek, there was never an -izo verb formed from it until we did.
I must say I've capitulated rather ruefully to the zedsters on this one, agreeing with The Oxford English Dictionary:
'… the suffix itself, whatever the element to which it is added, is in its origin the Greek -ιζειν , Latin -izāre ; and, as the pronunciation is also with z , there is no reason why in English the special French spelling should be followed, in opposition to that which is at once etymological and phonetic. In this Dictionary the termination is uniformly written -ize. '
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pabmusic View PostYes (an excellent book, by the way). Things like 'fall' for autumn - which apparently was common usage in Britain until almost the end of the 19th Century.
I like one in a letter from August Jaeger ('Nimrod') to Elgar, from the 1890s, where he's trying to lift Elgar's spirits and talks about "a day's attack of the blues".
"a day's attack of the blues" could be a reference to Obama in Chicago singing with Mick!
Comment
-
-
Hornspieler
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostUse of the letter Z when S would suffice: eg Revolutionize; and of "-or" rather than "-er" at the end of certain words: eg Advisor.
If like me, you only have the American/English spellchecker, who have to put up with "Z" being offered as the correct spelling of, for instance, "advisor" or "adviser"
American English is a bastardis(z)ed language and I wish people, particularly the media, would avoid using it.
HS
BTW To list all of my complaints would be A BIG ASK
Comment
-
amateur51
The weather forecaster as Celebrity/Personality! Computer graphics everywhere, arms flailing, grinning, mugging, some of them 'singing' their text. And the ones who tell you at 18:00 what it was like at 08:00 in Arbroath
Bring back Bert Foord-style weather-forecasting - sticky shapes that fell off, old tweed jacket with leather patch elbows, hair generally in need of a tidy and just as 'accurate' as these modern people but generally very calm.
More seaweed, less hysteria!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post...also those ugly angles...
They also imported some letters they were used to: z replaced s (which remained as a sibilant), k replaced c (which remained, but became a sibilant, too - actually the same sound as c), and qu replaced cw. But all these are angular (qu would usually have been written qv). So it seems the Anglo-Saxon alphabet became the Angular Norman one.
Comment
-
-
Lateralthinking1
Originally posted by jean View PostWhy, though? Do you know? (I haven't got time to explain now!)
Some of it is common sense. You wouldn't have an irregularity such as "er" in "adviser" by default. It has travelled for a reason. The reason is that is how it was intended to be.
"Advisor" emanates from (a) people perpetually making a mistake on the basis that similar words are "or" and then (b) seeking to make that mistake regular by saying both are ok. See the suggestions below for accepting both "s" and "z" as a study of exactly that sort of procedure.
The other point is timing. I never saw the word "advisor" in a book or a "z" in the "ise" words until the late 1970s if not later. Now I see them everywhere. They existed beforehand but the changes have been widespread.
As those changes are comparatively recent, they can be dismissed as modish for the rest of our lifetimes. Business and the new Civil Service insist on "z". They also increasingly use "advisor". I rest my case.Last edited by Guest; 24-02-12, 11:01.
Comment
Comment