aeolium,
I am suggesting that the Ireland management may be interpreting the disciplinary committee's statement that:
"The Committee, after careful analysis of the video evidence and consideration of the player's and his representative's explanation of the tackle, did not uphold the citing,"
to mean that the tackle was fine and should not have been penalised. However, that is not what the statement says. It says the citing by the Italian commissioner was not upheld (ie that it was not a red card offence). The Committee is silent on whether or not the penalty and yellow card were OK. If the committee had been sufficiently concerned by Barnes' original decision, they could have said so and rescinded the yellow card. They did not.
Kearney and others would have been at the hearing to give evidence. I doubt that they were party to the committee's deliberations after they had heard all the evidence.
I prefer to rely on the Committee's own statements rather than any subsequent gloss put on them by management teams and journalists.
I am suggesting that the Ireland management may be interpreting the disciplinary committee's statement that:
"The Committee, after careful analysis of the video evidence and consideration of the player's and his representative's explanation of the tackle, did not uphold the citing,"
to mean that the tackle was fine and should not have been penalised. However, that is not what the statement says. It says the citing by the Italian commissioner was not upheld (ie that it was not a red card offence). The Committee is silent on whether or not the penalty and yellow card were OK. If the committee had been sufficiently concerned by Barnes' original decision, they could have said so and rescinded the yellow card. They did not.
Kearney and others would have been at the hearing to give evidence. I doubt that they were party to the committee's deliberations after they had heard all the evidence.
I prefer to rely on the Committee's own statements rather than any subsequent gloss put on them by management teams and journalists.
Comment