Time for disestablishment methinks ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MrGongGong
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 18357

    Time for disestablishment methinks ?

    As a non Christian I am very sad to hear that the otherwise wise archbishop of York seems to think that the church owns who should be allowed to get married or not. I regard my own marriage as equal to the civil partnerships of several gay friends. I have no problem with Christians doing their own thing BUT to inflict this view on the rest of us is a bit much really. Surely it's time that we got rid of the established church ?
  • BBMmk2
    Late Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 20908

    #2
    I feel it's time the CoE were seperate from goverment. How can a proper Christian Church be associated with politics in the first place?
    Don’t cry for me
    I go where music was born

    J S Bach 1685-1750

    Comment

    • Richard Tarleton

      #3
      Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View Post
      I feel it's time the CoE were seperate from goverment. How can a proper Christian Church be associated with politics in the first place?
      The CoE does not have a place in the executive, but rather in the legislature, and this is clearly an anachronism. There's no reason why people should have a seat in the House of Lords simply by virtue of their subscribing to a particular set of beliefs or superstitions. On the contrary, I think it should be a disqualification

      Comment

      • aka Calum Da Jazbo
        Late member
        • Nov 2010
        • 9173

        #4
        her rh indoors wouldn't like it
        According to the best estimates of astronomers there are at least one hundred billion galaxies in the observable universe.

        Comment

        • MrGongGong
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 18357

          #5
          Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View Post
          The CoE does not have a place in the executive, but rather in the legislature, and this is clearly an anachronism. There's no reason why people should have a seat in the House of Lords simply by virtue of their subscribing to a particular set of beliefs or superstitions. On the contrary, I think it should be a disqualification
          Actually (and probably bizarrely for some ?) I think that the bishops should be involved in parliament as should a handful of rabbis , imams and people with other beliefs.......... our politics is too dominated by bean counters rather than people who have actually thought about the world ! But I don't think that one church should have sway over us all as is the case with an established church

          Comment

          • Richard Tarleton

            #6
            Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
            Actually (and probably bizarrely for some ?) I think that the bishops should be involved in parliament as should a handful of rabbis , imams and people with other beliefs.......... our politics is too dominated by bean counters rather than people who have actually thought about the world ! But I don't think that one church should have sway over us all as is the case with an established church
            Mr GG, why "beliefs"? I don't see why someone believing six impossible things before breakfast, like the White Queen in Alice in Wonderland, makes them a suitable person to sit in the House of Lords. Why stop at bishops, rabbis or imams in that case?

            The idea that the opposite to someone who "believes" is a "bean counter" or someone who "hasn't thought about the world" is indeed bizarre.

            Comment

            • spasuit

              #7
              Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
              Actually (and probably bizarrely for some ?) I think that the bishops should be involved in parliament as should a handful of rabbis , imams and people with other beliefs.......... our politics is too dominated by bean counters rather than people who have actually thought about the world ! But I don't think that one church should have sway over us all as is the case with an established church
              And why should believing in unprovable nonsense mean you have *thought about the world*? Quite the opposite....

              Comment

              • Eine Alpensinfonie
                Host
                • Nov 2010
                • 20542

                #8
                Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View Post
                The idea that the opposite to someone who "believes" is a "bean counter" or someone who "hasn't thought about the world" is indeed bizarre.
                Many of the "bean counters" are also religious. It isn't a case of either/or.

                Comment

                • MrGongGong
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 18357

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View Post
                  The idea that the opposite to someone who "believes" is a "bean counter" or someone who "hasn't thought about the world" is indeed bizarre.
                  who suggested that it was the opposite ?
                  not me
                  My feeling is that politics is too dominated by certain groups of people ......... "businesspeople" for example

                  Comment

                  • amateur51

                    #10
                    Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                    who suggested that it was the opposite ?
                    not me
                    My feeling is that politics is too dominated by certain groups of people ......... "businesspeople" for example
                    And lawyers and media types (Gove, Johnson, Bradshaw, Mensch)

                    Comment

                    • Richard Tarleton

                      #11
                      Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                      who suggested that it was the opposite ?
                      not me
                      bean counters rather than people who have actually thought about the world
                      You appear to equate "believers" with "people who have actually thought about the world". Apologies if I misunderstood you.

                      I do think that politics these days are dominated by apparatchiks who have gone straight into politics from nowhere, with no experience of other walks of life, and that both benches are full of clones, but that's another problem.

                      Comment

                      • amateur51

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View Post
                        .... and that both benches are full of clones, but that's another problem.
                        Clones?

                        Really?



                        Round em up, Mr Speaker Bercow!

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X