Gove shows the door to creationism as science

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Flosshilde
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 7988

    Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
    Anything?

    A symbol and reminder of the terrible things that can be done in the name of fear, politics or religious intolerance is surely not the worst thing to have on the walls.
    Perhaps, but having a reminder of the terrible things that can be done doesn't seem to stop the organisation responsible for exposing people to that reminder from doing terrible things (torture can be emotional and mental as well as physical)

    Comment

    • MrGongGong
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 18357

      Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
      Flossie's just contradicted you, Mr GG ... haven't atheists yet learned to sing from the same hymn sheet?
      how do you know i'm an Atheist ?
      you made that up as well

      Comment

      • scottycelt

        Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
        how do you know i'm an Atheist ?
        you made that up as well
        Anything else that I've failed to expertly decode from the jumble of words in #143... ?

        Comment

        • Flosshilde
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 7988

          I don't think that MrGongGong has said anything - in that post, nor in any other - that might lead you to think that he (or perhaps she?) is an atheist. His theos, though, might not be your theos.

          Comment

          • teamsaint
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 25178

            Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
            Perhaps, but having a reminder of the terrible things that can be done doesn't seem to stop the organisation responsible for exposing people to that reminder from doing terrible things (torture can be emotional and mental as well as physical)
            I wasn't advocating it's use, as I made clear.

            Plenty had been done that is very bad in the name of almost many belief systems, including aetheism.

            Th catholic church has a great deal to answer for ..........but it also provides a very useful whipping boy (!!) for those who might wish to deflect attention .
            It is true to say , for instance, that the vast bulk ofchild abuse, including the worst sorts, take place in the home. Our secular authorities routinely fail to deal with this........but far more is heard in the media about abuse in the catholic church than is ever heard about abuse in the home
            I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

            I am not a number, I am a free man.

            Comment

            • amateur51

              Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
              In the obvious assumption that the classroom walls would not be left bare, what would you replace the crucifixes with, Floss ...?

              'No Cuts' ... 'Tories Out!' ... 'Save My Mum's Pension' posters ?

              By comparison, I think the crucifixes might suddenly appear a relatively less subjective and more inspiring symbol for our kids ...
              What about some posters showing aspects of world poverty, and the attempts by religiously-inspied agencies such as Christian Aid and CAFOD, Alongside Oxfam & WaterAid and ActionAid, to do something about it

              Comment

              • amateur51

                Originally posted by aka Calum Da Jazbo View Post
                Moral Purity & Persecution in History Babbington Moore

                why i find both Atheism and Pragmatism morally preferable in the most succinct nutshell ...
                Wasn't Barrington Moore the chap who forged those Joyce Hatto recordings?

                Another Creation Myth

                Comment

                • scottycelt

                  Originally posted by amateur51 View Post
                  What about some posters showing aspects of world poverty, and the attempts by religiously-inspied agencies such as Christian Aid and CAFOD, Alongside Oxfam & WaterAid and ActionAid, to do something about it
                  Actually, such posters were already quite commonplace in my old school, Ams ... I confess I've no idea what goes on classroom walls today, and possibly that's just as well ...

                  Comment

                  • amateur51

                    Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
                    Actually, such posters were already quite commonplace in my old school, Ams ... I confess I've no idea what goes on classroom walls today, and possibly that's just as well ...
                    Well there you go, scotty - we are in agreement!

                    So what went wrong in your case?

                    Comment

                    • MrGongGong
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 18357

                      Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
                      Actually I confess I've no idea

                      well its one way of putting it

                      (sins of omission ??)

                      Comment

                      • scottycelt

                        Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
                        I don't think that MrGongGong has said anything - in that post, nor in any other - that might lead you to think that he (or perhaps she?) is an atheist. His theos, though, might not be your theos.
                        Ahhh ... I get it now ... he/she/it worships the Greek God Xenakis ... ?

                        Comment

                        • PhilipT
                          Full Member
                          • May 2011
                          • 422

                          Originally posted by amateur51 View Post
                          Not sure about Flossie, but I'd say that if a school accepts public money then it should not teach Creationism as science. That's all
                          Now there I completely agree with you (and, I'm sure, Flossie). As for indoctrination, I think we will soon find that it may depend on what is being indoctrinated. Do you really mean to suggest that it is morally wrong to indoctrinate future bankers in concepts of responsibility to society etc. etc.? Or do you mean that it's OK to indoctrinate them in ideas you approve of, but not ideas you don't?

                          Comment

                          • Flosshilde
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 7988

                            Definition of INDOCTRINATE
                            transitive verb
                            1: to instruct especially in fundamentals or rudiments : teach
                            2: to imbue with a usually partisan or sectarian opinion, point of view, or principle
                            — in·doc·tri·na·tion \(ˌ)in-ˌdäk-trə-ˈnā-shən\ noun
                            — in·doc·tri·na·tor \in-ˈdäk-trə-ˌnā-tər\ noun

                            Examples of INDOCTRINATE
                            The goal should be to teach politics, rather than to indoctrinate students in a narrow set of political beliefs.
                            <indoctrinated children in proper safety procedures>
                            Origin of INDOCTRINATE
                            probably from Middle English endoctrinen, from Anglo-French endoctriner, from en- + doctrine doctrine
                            First Known Use: 1626

                            From the Meriam-Webster on-line dictionary (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/indoctrinate)

                            I would suggest that 'indoctrinate' is used mainly now in the second meaning, & also to suggest an element of lack of choice or an unquestioning acceptance of whatever it is being indoctrinated.

                            Do you really mean to suggest that it is morally wrong to indoctrinate future bankers in concepts of responsibility to society etc. etc.? Or do you mean that it's OK to indoctrinate them in ideas you approve of, but not ideas you don't? Or do you mean that it's OK to indoctrinate them in ideas you approve of, but not ideas you don't?
                            I would consider it morally dubious to indoctrinate someone, even in something I approved of; in the case of your bankers, I would want to teach them about responsibility, in the hope that they might exercise it during their work.

                            Comment

                            • MrGongGong
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 18357

                              Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
                              Ahhh ... I get it now ... he/she/it worships the Greek God Xenakis ... ?
                              and here is the sacred incantation

                              Metastasis or Metastaseis ("dialectic transformations"), is an orchestral work by Iannis Xenakis, a Greek composer-architect and a major figure in the postwa...


                              listen and understand Padwan

                              Comment

                              • PhilipT
                                Full Member
                                • May 2011
                                • 422

                                Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
                                I would consider it morally dubious to indoctrinate someone, even in something I approved of; in the case of your bankers, I would want to teach them about responsibility, in the hope that they might exercise it during their work.
                                I don't think it would work. It's no better than teaching people about the law and its penalties - it's also important to inculcate some moral values and a sense of right and wrong. That is not (just) the responsibility of parents, it is the responsibility of society, often delegated to society's agent, the state. Mere teaching is not enough - you can't rely on individuals merely calculating their personal risks and benefits; there has to be a sense of doing something, or not doing something, because it's the right thing to do. I don't suggest that those moral values should necessarily draw their inspration from some religion, but provided the values are in harmony with those of the rest of society I don't see why they shouldn't.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X