The US Election

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Demetrius
    Full Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 276

    Question is whether a candidate like that could actually win the republican primary. Plenty of rough times before that, will be interesting to see how the US will wrestle with their problems, as mentioned earlier in this thread - Congress stays at it is; it will need some kind of genuine bipartizan effort.

    well, good night/morning, off to bed, too.

    Comment

    • gingerjon
      Full Member
      • Sep 2011
      • 165

      According to the votes counted so far (less the 3 states still to declare) Obama has 50.9m and 50.7 went Rmoney.

      So there are two things to learn: firstly, of those who voted there really wasn't much to choose between them. The Electoral College skews that a bit.

      The other thing is that America has about 230m people of voting age in it. Obama has the support of between 1/4 and 1/5 of them.
      The best music is the music that persuades us there is no other music in the world-- Alex Ross

      Comment

      • Dave2002
        Full Member
        • Dec 2010
        • 18052

        Phew! I slept thrugh it all. Daley got it wrong!

        gingerjon: The electoral college system may present problems, but I suspect they're not greatly different from the "problems" we have in the UK, where there are so many safe seats. You wouldn't expect campaigners not to exploit the system they work in, would you?

        Re the representation of 1/4 to 1/5 of eligible voters, is that based on turnout figures? I've not heard yet.

        Would you really want to live in a country (not the USA) where the president was "supported" by more than 90% of voters?

        Comment

        • antongould
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 8838

          Originally posted by gingerjon View Post
          According to the votes counted so far (less the 3 states still to declare) Obama has 50.9m and 50.7 went Rmoney.

          So there are two things to learn: firstly, of those who voted there really wasn't much to choose between them. The Electoral College skews that a bit.

          The other thing is that America has about 230m people of voting age in it. Obama has the support of between 1/4 and 1/5 of them.
          Intriguing Maths on that basis what % of the UK electorate support Mr. Cameron?

          Comment

          • teamsaint
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 25235

            Originally posted by antongould View Post
            Intriguing Maths on that basis what % of the UK electorate support Mr. Cameron?
            AG, the question surely is "what proportion of the banks support Cameron" ?!
            I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

            I am not a number, I am a free man.

            Comment

            • antongould
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 8838

              Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
              AG, the question surely is "what proportion of the banks support Cameron" ?!
              Quite possibly and by that measure a lot more than 1/4 to 1/5 !!

              Comment

              • kernelbogey
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 5808

                Originally posted by Pabmusic View Post
                The BBC website has Obama as the victor. Phew!
                Agreed, Pabs: phew indeed!

                Comment

                • Dave2002
                  Full Member
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 18052

                  Originally posted by antongould View Post
                  Quite possibly and by that measure a lot more than 1/4 to 1/5 !!
                  Straight numbers don't always work. Maybe a fuzzy logic approach would capture the real behaviour better. Another approach might be a weighted average.

                  I don't think you can really work out what people think - but elections simply provide a mechanism for allowing one person, or group or party to gain more or less control [or not, in some cases!].

                  Comment

                  • Nick Armstrong
                    Host
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 26575

                    Originally posted by amateur51 View Post
                    Few finer sights I imagine than Janet Daley looking disappointed - I can dream, can't I?
                    Have you seen it yet?
                    "...the isle is full of noises,
                    Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
                    Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
                    Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

                    Comment

                    • french frank
                      Administrator/Moderator
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 30534

                      Originally posted by Dave2002 View Post
                      Would you really want to live in a country (not the USA) where the president was "supported" by more than 90% of voters?
                      This is the 'UK' argument: you need an electoral system that gives a decisive result (heh, heh). The elected government can then do what it wants during its term in office but if the popular vote is that close it won't be hard to turf them out at the next election. Not necessarily a recipe for stable policy.
                      It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                      Comment

                      • amateur51

                        Originally posted by Caliban View Post
                        Have you seen it yet?
                        Gosh it's unusual to see such a shade of purple outside the environs of Peter Jones' furnishing fabric department

                        Comment

                        • amateur51

                          Childish of me I know but I do love it when 'the experts' and the pollsters all get it wrong. How much of it was down to flawed method and how much down to individuals telling porkies, I wonder

                          Walk in the park, President Obama! Congratulations!

                          Comment

                          • scottycelt

                            Barack says the next four years is going to be even better than the last four ...

                            Comment

                            • Dave2002
                              Full Member
                              • Dec 2010
                              • 18052

                              Originally posted by french frank View Post
                              This is the 'UK' argument: you need an electoral system that gives a decisive result (heh, heh). The elected government can then do what it wants during its term in office but if the popular vote is that close it won't be hard to turf them out at the next election. Not necessarily a recipe for stable policy.
                              I was thinking of some countries a bit like Zimbabwe, and some of the Eastern countries. Don't they support their presidents 110%?

                              Comment

                              • amateur51

                                Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
                                Barack says the next four years is going to be even better than the last four ...

                                Sounds good to me!

                                Such cynicism in one so young, scotty

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X