If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
... is there any significance in the fact that Flay asks us to delve for "an G"???
You really have got your magnifying lorgnette out today, haven't you, vinfortifié ?
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
not sure I fully understand golden ratio, so will have to copy a bleeding chunk from wikipedia
French composer Erik Satie used the golden ratio in several of his pieces, including Sonneries de la Rose+Croix. The golden ratio is also apparent in the organization of the sections in the music of Debussy's Reflets dans l'eau (Reflections in Water), from Images (1st series, 1905), in which "the sequence of keys is marked out by the intervals 34, 21, 13 and 8, and the main climax sits at the phi position."
The musicologist Roy Howat has observed that the formal boundaries of La Mer correspond exactly to the golden section. Trezise finds the intrinsic evidence "remarkable," but cautions that no written or reported evidence suggests that Debussy consciously sought such proportions. Also, many works of Chopin, mainly Etudes (studies) and Nocturnes, are formally based on the golden ratio. This results in the biggest climax of both musical expression and technical difficulty after about 2/3 of the piece.
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
And could I just say: Flay, please pass on our best birthday wishes to Mrs. Flay and thank her for her patience and forbearance in letting you play here with your friends so often! (And, am I mistaken or is it also vinteuil's special day today as well?)
(And, am I mistaken or is it also vinteuil's special day today as well?)
... thanks for a nice thought, Anna, but no, 16 Oct is not a particularly significant date in the vinteuil household. M et Mme V are both June birthdays...
(And, am I mistaken or is it also vinteuil's special day today as well?)
Yes, indeed you are correct Anna, it is vinchaud's special day for picking up on typos with his special 'secret service' high-magnification monocle
"...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Yes, indeed you are correct Anna, it is vinchaud's special day for picking up on typos with his special 'secret service' high-magnification monocle
I remember now, vints was talking about Vatican II (16th Oct 1962) and that date must have lodged in my memory as significant to him ..... <doh> Easy mistake!
I remember now, vints was talking about Vatican II (16th Oct 1962) and that date must have lodged in my memory as significant to him ..... <doh> Easy mistake!
For early music people 16 Oct might be significant as the feast day of St Gall - the Benedictine monastery bearing his name being an important centre *.
And let us not forget St Richard Gwyn, feast day 16 Oct, a native of Llanidloes in Powys, one of the Forty Martyrs...
Also, of course, Saint Margaret Mary Alacoque, feast day 16 Oct, to whom the vision of the Sacred Heart was first vouchsafed ( at Paray-le-Monial, 1673-1775 ).
And could I just say: Flay, please pass on our best birthday wishes to Mrs. Flay and thank her for her patience and forbearance in letting you play here with your friends so often! (And, am I mistaken or is it also vinteuil's special day today as well?)
Thanks for the kind wishes which I shall convey (to which she will no doubt reply that I should be getting on with my work and not being so distractible, no wonder I never get anything done etc. etc. )
Thanks for the summation, mercs. Everyone's being mischievous today!
The Golden Ratio is perplexing to me too, I must think about it. Not as easy to get the head round (no comments, mercs & Calibs!!) as the Fibonacci (brocolli) series.
Eventually it comes down to that familiar formula x = (−b + √(b2 − 4ac))/(2a) and somehow gives a number 1.61803398875... etc
If you divide this into 1 it gives you 0.61803398875. How odd!
Comment