King George and Queen Mary:

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Flosshilde
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 7988

    #31
    Originally posted by Ferretfancy View Post
    I expect she took her saucer of tea with enough Epsom salts to cover the back of a sixpence, having probably nicked the cup from her hosts on an earlier visit!
    Has the programme touched on her kleptomaniac tendencies?

    Comment

    • BBMmk2
      Late Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 20908

      #32
      Should be the Plantagenets on the throne!!
      Don’t cry for me
      I go where music was born

      J S Bach 1685-1750

      Comment

      • scottycelt

        #33
        Originally posted by mangerton View Post
        That'll be me then ... .
        I would never be so foolishly inaccurate and downright impertinent to ever suggest that all UK republicans were 'little miseries', mangerton ... I did exercise some unusual caution in my original remark, you understand ...

        Comment

        • Flosshilde
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 7988

          #34
          Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
          i dread to think what the country would end up with if we had to elect 'a non-political' President ... Jenni Murray, Sir David Attenborough? ... hmmmm, no thank you!
          As a fan of Jenni Murray on Woman's Hour I think that she would make a wonderful President

          Plus the fact that kings and queens were born and bred into the role of Head of State
          Um, the last king wasn't, & his wife sustained a life-long hatred of the woman who caused him to become king. There have been others who weren't expected to be king - Henry VIII for example.

          Comment

          • Vile Consort
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 696

            #35
            Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
            Its all about distraction from real issues.
            I though that was what Radio 3 was for. And pornography.

            Either way, what's wrong with a bit of distraction?

            Comment

            • mangerton
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 3346

              #36
              Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
              I would never be so foolishly inaccurate and downright impertinent to ever suggest that all UK republicans were 'little miseries', mangerton ... I did exercise some unusual caution in my original remark, you understand ...
              Of course, scotty. My tongue was firmly in my cheek.

              Comment

              • scottycelt

                #37
                Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
                But how do we know that they want to retain the monarchy, when they haven't been able to say so? (& don't confuse a general, vague, idea that the present monarch is OK with a liking for the concept of the monarchy)



                But a republican head of state would be elected, & therefore not 'imposed' on an 'unwilling' people, but elected by them (using a proper system, not first past the post)
                Yes, let's have a referendum, if you wish, and increase the debt burden further, quite unnecessarily ...

                Then the Monarchy will be overwhelmingly approved by 'the people' and 'using a proper system' as well. The 'people' don't want your republican president and, according to all opinion polls for yonks, that's the simple truth, Floss.

                I suppose If it needs an expensive and needless referendum to finally convince some minority malcontents of the hitherto glaringly obvious, then so be it!

                Comment

                • amateur51

                  #38
                  Originally posted by scottycelt View Post
                  Yes, let's have a referendum, if you wish, and increase the debt burden further, quite unnecessarily ...

                  Then the Monarchy will be overwhelmingly approved by 'the people' and 'using a proper system' as well. The 'people' don't want your republican president and, according to all opinion polls for yonks, that's the simple truth, Floss.

                  I suppose If it needs an expensive and needless referendum to finally convince some minority malcontents of the hitherto glaringly obvious, then so be it!
                  Let's wait til King Chas the Interferer has been on the throne a couple of years, then we'll have a referendum, scotty

                  Comment

                  • BBMmk2
                    Late Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 20908

                    #39
                    Then the Plantagenet family will be back where we belong!!
                    Don’t cry for me
                    I go where music was born

                    J S Bach 1685-1750

                    Comment

                    • Flosshilde
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 7988

                      #40
                      No, if people insist on replacing the present Germans then it shouldn't be with more foreigners. Let's have a proper English monarch in England; of course, it might be a bit difficult a) deciding if the last 'indiginous' English monarch was Offa or Egbert (or neither), and b) tracing their most direct descendant. I think that in Scotland the last indiginous monarch was Alexander III, who died in 1286; after that they were French.

                      Comment

                      • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                        Gone fishin'
                        • Sep 2011
                        • 30163

                        #41
                        But the "English" are German, Flossie! (Angles, Saxons - Sasenachs/Saesnegs - Jutes). For real indiginuity (?) we have to go back to somebody who'd nowadays be regarded as "Welsh"!
                        [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                        Comment

                        • amateur51

                          #42
                          Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                          But the "English" are German, Flossie! (Angles, Saxons - Sasenachs/Saesnegs - Jutes). For real indiginuity (?) we have to go back to somebody who'd nowadays be regarded as "Welsh"!
                          That'll be me or Anna then ... I'd choose Anna - her profile looks better on stamps

                          Comment

                          • teamsaint
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 25202

                            #43
                            i would make the whole so called royal family sit through a 2 day sales meeting like I have to tomorrow and friday, on average wages, and then see if they look quite so smug.

                            Might drink my tea out of the saucer and see what the boss says...and then I will hit him with "it was good enough for Queen Mary, so its good enough for you". Might raise a laugh. or lighten the payroll !!


                            Oh and after two days of targets and suchlike, I would send them to work for the rest of their lives at asda.
                            I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                            I am not a number, I am a free man.

                            Comment

                            • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                              Gone fishin'
                              • Sep 2011
                              • 30163

                              #44
                              Originally posted by amateur51 View Post
                              That'll be me or Anna then ... I'd choose Anna - her profile looks better on stamps
                              There! That's the Constitution sorted!

                              Now; the Deficit ...
                              [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                              Comment

                              • scottycelt

                                #45
                                Originally posted by amateur51 View Post
                                Let's wait til King Chas the Interferer has been on the throne a couple of years, then we'll have a referendum, scotty
                                You have a point, there, Ams ...

                                Chas should keep his nose out of controversial issues and remember who he is .. ie, he is there to serve 'the people' not to lecture to them.

                                If he doesn't like it he can scarper off to Republican France with his fancy woman/wife, just like a previous Prince of Wales, and allow Sweet William to take over ..

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X