Christopher Hitchens 1949 - 2011
Collapse
X
-
amateur51
Originally posted by Pilchardman View PostWhy would you imagine I think otherwise? Of course he was. He was entitled the be a pseudo left poseur, who, when push came to shove, turned out to be an enthusiast for neo con warmongering, and who was instrumental in winning over Labourites to a pro war stance, thus facilitating Blair.
Hitchens is on record a) as being against all fundamentalists and totalitarians and b) as believing that Mercan furrin policy under Bush 43 was hopelessly hands-off and that this was immoral when Saddam had been a Mercan creature up to 1990. Hitchens felt that America owed Saddam's removal to the people of Iraq. Rather a long way from what you're suggesting, Pilchardman although the result is the same, I grant you.
Comment
-
amateur51
Originally posted by Pilchardman View PostI didn't say "all".
So, you're a Labourite? That explains much. :p
I've voted in every General Election I was entitled to (I'm 60 soon)& I haven't voted Labour since 1997. I voted against Labour in a bye-election in 2003 and the anti-war LibDem candidate became the MP, and a good constituency MP she has turned out to be too.
Comment
-
Lateralthinking1
Your argument Pilchardman becomes flimsy when it comes to the character of Tony. I don't recognise him as the gullible wimp you describe. Rather, I would see him as having been chomping at the bit on the sight of tanks and the kind of megalomaniac who still reckons that one day he should insist on becoming the Pope. (LD (97) LD (01) LD (05) Green (10))
Comment
-
John Skelton
Christopher Hitchens was arguably less insufferable than Richard Dawkins and arguably more toxic. Arguably it might be the other way around, of course.
You can read a sneak preview of Christopher Hitchens' last interview (with Richard Dawkins, of course) here http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/th...chens-catholic
"Never be afraid of stridency"
RD: "The people who did Hitler's dirty work were almost all religious."
Really? I thought they were all family doctors called Helmut obsessed with populist versions of Nietzsche.
Comment
-
Pilchardman
Originally posted by amateur51 View PostThe way in which you make incorrect leaps of logic with almost unerring facility seems mighty close to me
You can see why quoting me saying Hitchins "was instrumental in winning over Labourites" then saying "He didn't convince me" might lead me to the assumption, surely.
Comment
-
amateur51
Originally posted by John Skelton View PostChristopher Hitchens was arguably less insufferable than Richard Dawkins and arguably more toxic. Arguably it might be the other way around, of course.
You can read a sneak preview of Christopher Hitchens' last interview (with Richard Dawkins, of course) here http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/th...chens-catholic
"Never be afraid of stridency"
RD: "The people who did Hitler's dirty work were almost all religious."
Really? I thought they were all family doctors called Helmut obsessed with populist versions of Nietzsche.
"Long live Germany. Long live Argentina. Long live Austria. These are the three countries with which I have been most connected and which I will not forget. I greet my wife, my family, and my friends. I am ready. We'll meet again soon, as is the fate of all men. I die believing in God"
Comment
-
amateur51
Originally posted by Pilchardman View PostSo, you're not a Labourite? I see.
You can see why quoting me saying Hitchins "was instrumental in winning over Labourites" then saying "He didn't convince me" might lead me to the assumption, surely.
I might still be old-school Labour, tho'
Innit
Comment
Comment