Pronunciation watch

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ferneyhoughgeliebte
    Gone fishin'
    • Sep 2011
    • 30163

    Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post

    Must be the weather...
    I think ts's point - six-and-a-half years after the Thread started - is that one cannot "watch" (in the sense of using one's eyes) the sound of somebody's pronunciation.

    An appropriate comment from A Midsummer Night's Dream comes to mind.
    [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

    Comment

    • Eine Alpensinfonie
      Host
      • Nov 2010
      • 20570

      Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
      I think ts's point - six-and-a-half years after the Thread started - is that one cannot "watch" (in the sense of using one's eyes) the sound of somebody's pronunciation.
      Well, you might think so, but turn the sound off on television, when a person is speaking RP. He/she will hardly move her lips. Compare this with someone with a Scottish or regional accent, and increased facial movement will be in evidence, because they are less likely to swallow their vowel sounds.

      Does this mean posh people are lazy? Probably not, but it really does happen.

      Comment

      • teamsaint
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 25193

        Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
        I think ts's point - six-and-a-half years after the Thread started - is that one cannot "watch" (in the sense of using one's eyes) the sound of somebody's pronunciation.

        An appropriate comment from A Midsummer Night's Dream comes to mind.
        That Was indeeed my point, arrived at over a lovely lunchtime cuppa, while I also pondered the cunning "wireless phone charging " system in Pret, which seems to be a lot more complicated than , well, charging a phone using a wire.
        I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

        I am not a number, I am a free man.

        Comment

        • Eine Alpensinfonie
          Host
          • Nov 2010
          • 20570

          Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
          T... while I also pondered the cunning "wireless phone charging " system in Pret, which seems to be a lot more complicated than , well, charging a phone using a wire.

          Comment

          • ferneyhoughgeliebte
            Gone fishin'
            • Sep 2011
            • 30163

            Wasn't there a mention of "Laura Norder" here a couple of hours ago?
            [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

            Comment

            • Serial_Apologist
              Full Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 37589

              Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
              Wasn't there a mention of "Laura Norder" here a couple of hours ago?


              #3733 - fyi.

              Comment

              • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                Gone fishin'
                • Sep 2011
                • 30163

                Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                - Was it really yesterday?! (And on the wrong Thread, too!)
                [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                Comment

                • french frank
                  Administrator/Moderator
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 30241

                  Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                  I think ts's point - six-and-a-half years after the Thread started - is that one cannot "watch" (in the sense of using one's eyes) the sound of somebody's pronunciation.
                  But 'watch' being eventually (far enough back) cognate with 'wake' doesn't necessarily imply using one's eyes, does it (other than for joking purposes, as may be assumed with ts's comment)? It can be 'to be awake to something', 'to be vigilant' (another related idea, from vigilare).

                  What would the appropriate sensory term be - 'Pronunciation listen'? Even if understood it would have lost an essential element of meaning.
                  It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                  Comment

                  • Pulcinella
                    Host
                    • Feb 2014
                    • 10887

                    Originally posted by french frank View Post
                    But 'watch' being eventually (far enough back) cognate with 'wake' doesn't necessarily imply using one's eyes, does it (other than for joking purposes, as may be assumed with ts's comment)? It can be 'to be awake to something', 'to be vigilant' (another related idea, from vigilare).

                    What would the appropriate sensory term be - 'Pronunciation listen'? Even if understood it would have lost an essential element of meaning.
                    Alert?

                    PS: not one of the senses; sorry, should have read your post more closely!
                    Last edited by Pulcinella; 23-06-17, 15:29. Reason: PS added.

                    Comment

                    • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                      Gone fishin'
                      • Sep 2011
                      • 30163

                      Originally posted by french frank View Post
                      But 'watch' being eventually (far enough back) cognate with 'wake' doesn't necessarily imply using one's eyes, does it (other than for joking purposes, as may be assumed with ts's comment)? It can be 'to be awake to something', 'to be vigilant' (another related idea, from vigilare).

                      What would the appropriate sensory term be - 'Pronunciation listen'? Even if understood it would have lost an essential element of meaning.
                      Yes - even "seeing" and "vision" don't necessarily involve eyesight; the very word "eyesight" would be a clumsy tautology if it did.
                      [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                      Comment

                      • Eine Alpensinfonie
                        Host
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 20570

                        Is anyone here good at lipreading?

                        Comment

                        • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                          Gone fishin'
                          • Sep 2011
                          • 30163

                          Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                          Is anyone here good at lipreading?
                          Beg pardon?
                          [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                          Comment

                          • Serial_Apologist
                            Full Member
                            • Dec 2010
                            • 37589

                            Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                            Beg pardon?
                            No one puts mouth in my words!

                            Comment

                            • jean
                              Late member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 7100

                              The man's name is spelt Weinstein.

                              So you might expect an approximation to an authentic German Vineshtine.

                              Or a slightly less German Winestine.

                              Or failing that, an anglicised Weensteen.

                              But the authorised pronunciation seems to be Winesteen.

                              Which is odd, since there's the same vowel in both syllables.

                              Comment

                              • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                                Gone fishin'
                                • Sep 2011
                                • 30163

                                Originally posted by jean View Post
                                The man's name is spelt Weinstein.

                                So you might expect an approximation to an authentic German Vineshtine.
                                Or a slightly less German Winestine.
                                Or failing that, an anglicised Weensteen.
                                But the authorised pronunciation seems to be Winesteen.
                                Which is odd, since there's the same vowel in both syllables.
                                Sean Bean?
                                [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X