If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Almost certainly apocryphal, and pulled out of the cupboard whenever it would be easier to give in.
I am heartened by the number of young people I meet who really care about the English language.
Similarly, I was impressed by a chance meeting with a French teacher of French in SE France. She was passionate about her language and worried about the effect English was having on French. She had some very convincing arguments.
I regard the (to me) over strict appliance of artificial rules of grammar as similar to those who consult the 'rules of etiquette' in accordance with the handbook. People learn them by heart when they are afraid of committing social solecisms and being looked down upon by others: they would do better to stick to robust common sense and their own instincts.
I mean, who ever would stick their little finger up when drinking a cup of tea these days?
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
It isn't really the same. Language is a form of communication. Etiquette is less rational and is confused with manners. I would say that the use of language is more like manners than etiquette.
It isn't really the same. Language is a form of communication. Etiquette is less rational and is confused with manners. I would say that the use of language is more like manners than etiquette.
I've enjoyed reading this thread.
I wonder whether the 'rules' referred to passim above are, like etiquette, social. I have a hunch that they may often derive from some venerated written authority - a textbook, perhaps, or a 'How to...' type - and these 'rules' were regarded, in a century of great social mobility, as indicators of education, and therefore of social refinement.
I've no evidence for this except the example of my father, from a humble rural background, who became a teacher, and was very rigid in his adherence to rules and to inflicting them on pupils and colleagues.
[QUOTE=french frank;250796Punctuation is partly personal: a friend commented on my use of colons and semicolons recently. I tend to litter my writing with them because I know what they are intended to convey and I enjoy their subtleties: they probably escape most people . [/QUOTE]
Dare I say, not me, ff? My late father instructed me at an early age in their correct use.
It isn't really the same. Language is a form of communication. Etiquette is less rational and is confused with manners. I would say that the use of language is more like manners than etiquette.
Analogies aren't exact: I merely meant reliance on learned rules can simply be a defence against being thought to be "wrong".
In answer to kb, I'll offer a theory:
I think many of these rules go back no further than the Victorians, deciding arbitrarily on the basis of Victorian 'good writing' what was right and what was wrong.
Mangers - of course not you
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment