Pronunciation watch

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bryn
    Banned
    • Mar 2007
    • 24688

    Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
    And the equally age-old Ecksetera.
    Las heard that in Febry this year.

    Comment

    • LeMartinPecheur
      Full Member
      • Apr 2007
      • 4717

      Originally posted by Bryn View Post
      Las heard that in Febry this year.
      Well, isn't February really awkward to get right? Not sure I don't say Feb-yew-ary in some careless moments

      (Do I take it that nobody else has caught Headbrides from the BBC? Be'er ge' me lug'oles srinjed praps!)
      I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!

      Comment

      • cloughie
        Full Member
        • Dec 2011
        • 22182

        Originally posted by Bryn View Post
        Las heard that in Febry this year.
        Wasn’t it in Febuary?

        Comment

        • LeMartinPecheur
          Full Member
          • Apr 2007
          • 4717

          Originally posted by LMcD View Post
          Aren't 'headbrides' people who swap vows with 'headgrooms'?
          My inner pedant does greatly regret that the was no Pronunciation Watch back in medieval times to stop 'bridegooms' (bridesmen, cf. Ger. Brautigam) now needing to pack their curry-combs for the honeymoon
          Last edited by LeMartinPecheur; 20-08-20, 12:22.
          I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!

          Comment

          • Bryn
            Banned
            • Mar 2007
            • 24688

            Originally posted by cloughie View Post
            Wasn’t it in Febuary?
            Might have been Frebrooee.

            Comment

            • LMcD
              Full Member
              • Sep 2017
              • 8638

              When my wife worked at the local GP surgery (she retired in 2005) older patients would regularly come to pick up their perscriptions.

              Comment

              • Serial_Apologist
                Full Member
                • Dec 2010
                • 37814

                Originally posted by LMcD View Post
                When my wife worked at the local GP surgery (she retired in 2005) older patients would regularly come to pick up their perscriptions.
                I have to admit to having got prescriptions and proscriptions the wrong way around on occasion.

                Comment

                • Dave2002
                  Full Member
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 18035

                  Our new car has very odd pronunciation from the sat nav. Thus "A621" would come out as "ay" "six" "te" "one".
                  I think it does this irrespective of which voice, male or female, is chosen. Also, the "speaker" puts pauses in places which nobody would normally place them. Sounds really odd and strange, as the voices have generally very good and precise enunciation "not yer usyal dialect stuff".

                  On the other hand a previous car, which we still have, has a robotic voice, and breaks everything up into short syllables. Laughable, really, and often only marginally intelligible.
                  Last edited by Dave2002; 24-08-20, 10:59.

                  Comment

                  • Serial_Apologist
                    Full Member
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 37814

                    Originally posted by Dave2002 View Post
                    Our new car has very odd pronunciation from the sat nav. Thus "A621" would come out as "ay" "six" "te" "one".
                    I think it does this irrespective of which voice, male or female, is chosen. Also, the "speaker" puts pauses in places which nobody would normally place them. Sounds really odd strange, as the voices have generally very good and precise enunciation "not yer usyal dialect stuff".

                    On the other hand a previous car, which we still have, has a robotic voice, and breaks everything up into short syllables. Laughable, really, and often only marginally intelligible.
                    Destination announcements on trains have those odd tiny hiatuses (haiti?), which result from splicing one part of an announcement to another, specific to the route and the next stop. "Barnes" often loses the initial "b..." I once mentioned to another passenger how I had often wondered how long it had taken the announcer, with the very clear female voice which seems to be the same voice on whichever line one is travelling, to record every destination, every railway stop, and every permutation of every possible journey on every timetable. And who had copyright on the announcements? Could a hip hop artist be sued for breaching, let's say, Transport for London's ownership of the announcements by sampling them for a recording to be sold? "Oh, it's all done by computer", she answered matter of factly, completely straghtfaced!

                    Comment

                    • french frank
                      Administrator/Moderator
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 30456

                      Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                      those odd tiny hiatuses (haiti?)
                      plural hiatūs - 4th declension.
                      It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                      Comment

                      • Serial_Apologist
                        Full Member
                        • Dec 2010
                        • 37814

                        Originally posted by french frank View Post
                        plural hiatūs - 4th declension.
                        Aha! - thanks!

                        Comment

                        • kernelbogey
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 5803

                          The announcer on Waterloo-Portsmouth trains mangles the destination into 'Pwortsmouth': possibly intended as a genteel correction to the local demotic 'Portsmuff'.

                          Comment

                          • cloughie
                            Full Member
                            • Dec 2011
                            • 22182

                            Originally posted by kernelbogey View Post
                            The announcer on Waterloo-Portsmouth trains mangles the destination into 'Pwortsmouth': possibly intended as a genteel correction to the local demotic 'Portsmuff'.
                            ts prefers to avoid mentioning it all!

                            Comment

                            • johncorrigan
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 10409

                              Originally posted by cloughie View Post
                              ts prefers to avoid mentioning it all!

                              He's a bit more Pottymouth about it, cloughie.
                              Last edited by johncorrigan; 24-08-20, 12:28. Reason: slight spelling issue there!

                              Comment

                              • cloughie
                                Full Member
                                • Dec 2011
                                • 22182

                                Originally posted by johncorrigan View Post

                                He's a bit more Pottymouth about it, coughie.
                                Saints and sinners?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X