Pronunciation watch

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Richard Tarleton

    Originally posted by gurnemanz View Post
    I think that it is likely to be the other way round: The second is accented and therefore long. My knowledge of Spanish is very limited (Dos cervezas por favor) but I thought that Spanish only really has long and short vowels inasmuch as vowels tend to be lengthened when stressed. They are pronounced exactly the same and the only difference is in length, whereas in English a long "a" is a phonetically distinct sound from a short "a". (cart/cat). NB This is off the top of my head and I may have got this wrong.
    Subcontrabass was talking about the name of the painting here, not Spanish(see ##1718-19). See my post here for the Spanish pronunciation.

    Comment

    • french frank
      Administrator/Moderator
      • Feb 2007
      • 29881

      Originally posted by gurnemanz View Post
      I think that it is likely to be the other way round:
      I'm not sure that that is a rule. I remember at school we always used to recite a-MO, a-MAS, a-MAT whereas later development indicates it would have been stressed on the first, short, vowel; A-mo, A-mas, A-mat. But a-MA-mus, a-MA-tis and A-mant. I think words built up on the -are conjugation will be stressed on the first syllable if disyllabic (salvo), on the second if trisyllabic (salvare, salvator) and on the third if tetrasyllabic (salvaTOrem), which would be the rule which indicates sal-VA-tor (mundi), not SAL-vator. Does that work most of the time?
      It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

      Comment

      • jean
        Late member
        • Nov 2010
        • 7100

        Originally posted by french frank View Post
        ...A-mant...
        It's a very long time since I've had to do any scansion, but isn't a vowel followed by two consonants always long?

        Comment

        • french frank
          Administrator/Moderator
          • Feb 2007
          • 29881

          Originally posted by jean View Post
          It's a very long time since I've had to do any scansion, but isn't a vowel followed by two consonants always long?
          That is the rule in scansion, yes. But if the second syllable had been stressed, it would have meant that syllable would have been stressed in French, whereas aiment is what you get. How does that work with Italian?
          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

          Comment

          • french frank
            Administrator/Moderator
            • Feb 2007
            • 29881

            Originally posted by french frank View Post
            How does that work with Italian?
            As far as I can see Italian and Spanish also stress the first syllable in the 3º person plural which suggests the Romans did too.
            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

            Comment

            • Eine Alpensinfonie
              Host
              • Nov 2010
              • 20563

              Originally posted by french frank View Post
              I'm not sure that that is a rule. I remember at school we always used to recite a-MO, a-MAS, a-MAT whereas later development indicates it would have been stressed on the first, short, vowel; A-mo, A-mas, A-mat. But a-MA-mus, a-MA-tis and A-mant.
              Our Latin teacher actually taught us to pronounce these correctly, but we still got it wrong. I suppose because we were emphasising the bits that were important to remember - i.e the endings.

              Comment

              • jean
                Late member
                • Nov 2010
                • 7100

                Originally posted by french frank View Post
                That is the rule in scansion, yes.
                Yes, I realise I'm talking about quantity rather than stress.

                But I always found it difficult to imagine how a 'long' vowel could be unstressed, assuming there was any observable stress in Latin at all.

                But the fact is that in the absence of recordings from the period, we know very little about stress in Classical Latin.

                Comment

                • french frank
                  Administrator/Moderator
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 29881

                  Originally posted by jean View Post
                  But the fact is that in the absence of recordings from the period, we know very little about stress in Classical Latin.
                  But there is evidence in the development of the Romance languages; and where they all agree, in this one respect, we can be sure that we know what spoken Latin sounded like across the Empire. Classical Latin, as you say, has quantity rather than stress, and in poetry scansion is about rhythm rather than accent, and has its own rules.
                  It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                  Comment

                  • vinteuil
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 12664

                    .

                    ... today Clemency Burton Hill introduced and followed Judith Bingham's setting of Geo: Herbert's "Love bade me welcome... " with the pronunciation "Love *bayed me welcome... ". Surely surely the past tense of bid is pronounced "bad" not *"bayed" ???

                    Comment

                    • Bryn
                      Banned
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 24688

                      Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                      .

                      ... today Clemency Burton Hill introduced and followed Judith Bingham's setting of Geo: Herbert's "Love bade me welcome... " with the pronunciation "Love *bayed me welcome... ". Surely surely the past tense of bid is pronounced "bad" not *"bayed" ???
                      https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/44367/love-iii Not bad.

                      Apparently some Americans say "bard". "Bayed" or "baid" is a very common error.

                      Comment

                      • Bert Coules
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 763

                        At least she didn't come out with "bidded"...

                        Comment

                        • french frank
                          Administrator/Moderator
                          • Feb 2007
                          • 29881

                          Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                          .

                          ... today Clemency Burton Hill introduced and followed Judith Bingham's setting of Geo: Herbert's "Love bade me welcome... " with the pronunciation "Love *bayed me welcome... ". Surely surely the past tense of bid is pronounced "bad" not *"bayed" ???
                          I'd guess it would have been in Herbert's day. Old spelling (and pronunciation) seems to have been bæd. Not sure why the 'e' would have been added but once there, the pronounce-as-you-spell brigæd took over.
                          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                          Comment

                          • Eine Alpensinfonie
                            Host
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 20563

                            Well, I though the past tense of bid was bade.

                            Comment

                            • jean
                              Late member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 7100

                              It is - pronounced bad. See above.

                              Comment

                              • muzzer
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2013
                                • 1186

                                I'm 99.9% sure the newsreader on R3 has just referred to "Theresa May's de-PU-ty" being sacked. I'm afraid I cringed and yes, thought it was heinous enough an error to come straight here to post about it.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X