I've been thinking about why it is that I'm still glad to hear some old musical warhorses that I've heard times without number; whereas other pieces make me groan and switch off, metaphoraically and/or literally.
Examples for me would be Elgar's 'Enigma Variations' and Dvorak's 'New World' Symphony. I'm always happy to hear them, especially in interesting new performances. Indeed, I'll actively decide to listen to both those sometimes, and put on the CD or iPod tracks - particularly in the performances I love most (Kondrashin/Concertgebouw for the Dvorak, Oramo/CBSO for the Elgar).
I wonder if it is a mark of their musical quality? Maybe not - probably just a question of personal taste, as so often in rather aimless threads like this one. It's relevant amid the hoo-hah about endless repetition of certain pieces in the morning on R3.
Anyway, just musing aloud, really - and interested to hear others' views and 'welcome warhorse' candidates....
Examples for me would be Elgar's 'Enigma Variations' and Dvorak's 'New World' Symphony. I'm always happy to hear them, especially in interesting new performances. Indeed, I'll actively decide to listen to both those sometimes, and put on the CD or iPod tracks - particularly in the performances I love most (Kondrashin/Concertgebouw for the Dvorak, Oramo/CBSO for the Elgar).
I wonder if it is a mark of their musical quality? Maybe not - probably just a question of personal taste, as so often in rather aimless threads like this one. It's relevant amid the hoo-hah about endless repetition of certain pieces in the morning on R3.
Anyway, just musing aloud, really - and interested to hear others' views and 'welcome warhorse' candidates....
Comment