If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
... and then you have 'the total spend' on that 'new build'. And if it's shops you mean, you have to calculate the anticipated 'footfall'.
I like 'footfall'!
... and then you have 'the total spend' on that 'new build'. And if it's shops you mean, you have to calculate the anticipated 'footfall'.
I like 'footfall'!
Speaking of footfall, a trip can mean at least 3 different things.
Last night at the Arsenal v Man City match, Alan Smith the commentator on Sky Sports reported that the ball was 'headed towards the top right-hand corner of the goal'. The player responsible actually used his right foot.
Yet another example of an inappropriate Americanism which has now replaced 'heading' in the UK media vocabulary for no other apparent reason than that they talk like that across 'the pond' and it is therefore considered 'cool'?
Now this is an odd list on the website of my local church. The 100 most commonly used English words:
a about after all also an and any as at back be because but by can come could day do even first for from get give good go have he her him his how I if in into it its just know like look make me most my new no now not of on one only or other our out over people say see she so some take the their there they time than that them then these think this to two up us use with you want way we well what who which when will work would year your
There is a first but not a last, a new but not an old, a me but not a you, a good but not a bad, an up but not a down, a day but not a night, a no but not a yes, a who, what, when and how but not a why.
Wow thanks - it only needs an extra zero and it will be more than the number of percentage points charged by banks for exceeding personal overdrafts. Incidentally in case anyone is interested:
Working on a day to day basis with brillant Ph. D. engineers from all over the world, I am often amused by their lack of knowledge of basic English.
An engineer and old friend of mine (PhD Cantab, now retired) is an exception. He was in charge of the visual telecoms division at BT Labs, and is a stickler for correct grammar and punctuation. He used to edit very thoroughly any research reports submitted by his staff - so much so that at his retirement gathering he was presented with a box of semicolons!
An engineer and old friend of mine (PhD Cantab, now retired) is an exception. He was in charge of the visual telecoms division at BT Labs, and is a stickler for correct grammar and punctuation. He used to edit very thoroughly any research reports submitted by his staff - so much so that at his retirement gathering he was presented with a box of semicolons!
What a wonderful tribute - I hope that he appreciated it
Perhaps not really suitable as 'Semantics' but sure suspectible is not a word as used above on my BT home page for some time now. Don't they mean susceptible? Doesn't anyone at BT CARE?
Comment