The Red Flag's flagging a bit... Lol.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • amateur51

    #16
    Brilliant stuff, mercia

    Was that Pinochet I saw saluting around 00.26?

    Comment

    • amateur51

      #17
      [QUOTE=Bryn;87474]

      Oh but "Welsh" is, by etymology, foreign, is it not?

      In that it is the English for Cymraeg, I agree Bryn

      Later: Thanks vinteuil - you wuz ahead of me, as always

      Comment

      • vinteuil
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 12937

        #18
        good old wiki - I will regard walnuts, the Vlach Quartet, and Walworth Road differently now...

        Etymology of Wales
        The Anglo-Saxon word for 'foreign' or 'foreigner' was Waelisc and a 'foreign(er's) land' was called WÄ“alas. The modern English forms of these words with respect to the modern country are Welsh (the people) and Wales (the land), respectively.
        Historically in Britain the words were not restricted to modern Wales or to the Welsh but were used indiscriminately to refer to anything that the Anglo-Saxons associated with Celtic Britons, including other foreign lands (e.g., Cornwall), places once associated with Celtic Britons (e.g., Walworth in County Durham and Walton in West Yorkshire), the surnames of people (e.g., Walsh and Wallace) and various other things that were once new and foreign to the Anglo-Saxons (e.g., the walnut). None of these historic usages is necessarily connected to Wales or the Welsh.
        The Anglo-Saxon words are derived from the same Germanic root (singular Walh, plural Walha), applied to Italic and Celtic peoples and places, that has provided modern names for Continental lands (e.g., Wallonia and Wallachia) and peoples (e.g., the Vlachs via a borrowing into Old Church Slavonic), none of which has any connection to Wales or the Welsh.

        Etymology of Cymru
        The modern Welsh name for themselves is Cymry, and Cymru is Welsh for "Land of the Cymry". The etymological origin of Cymry is from the Brythonic word combrogi, meaning "fellow-countrymen". The use of the word Cymry as a self-designation derives from the post-Roman Era relationship of the Welsh with the Brythonic-speaking peoples of northern England and southern Scotland, the peoples of Yr Hen Ogledd (English: The Old North). In its original use, it amounted to a self-perception that the Welsh and the "Men of the North" were one people, exclusive of all others.[ In particular, the term was not applied to the Cornish or the Breton peoples, who are of similar heritage, culture, and language to both the Welsh and the Men of the North. The word came into use as a self-description probably before the 7th century. It is attested in a praise poem to Cadwallon ap Cadfan (Moliant Cadwallon, by Afan Ferddig) c. 633. In Welsh literature, the word Cymry was used throughout the Middle Ages to describe the Welsh, though the older, more generic term Brythoniaid continued to be used to describe any of the Britonnic peoples (including the Welsh) and was the more common literary term until c. 1100. Thereafter Cymry prevailed as a reference to the Welsh. Until c. 1560 Cymry was used indiscriminately to mean either the people (Cymry) or their homeland (Cymru).
        The Latinised forms of these names are Cambrian or Cambric ("Welsh") and Cambria ("Wales"). They survive as lesser-used alternative names for Wales, Welsh and the Welsh people. Examples include the Cambrian Mountains (which cover most of Wales), the newspaper Cambrian News, as well as the organisations Cambrian Airways, Cambrian Railways and Cambrian Archaeological Association. Outside Wales, this form survives as the name of Cumbria in North West England, which was once a part of Yr Hen Ogledd. This form also appears at times in literary references, perhaps most notably in the pseudohistorical Historia Regum Britanniae of Geoffrey of Monmouth, where the character of Camber is described as the eponymous King of Cymru.

        Comment

        • Flosshilde
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 7988

          #19
          I prefer la Marseillaise, both for its sentiments and its tune - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVFccuaGfso

          (admitedly it's sung here by a rather better performer than the Labour party front bench can muster)

          Comment

          • teamsaint
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 25226

            #20
            THe lib dems sing that kind of thing? amazing. pity their ministers seem to be the opposite side of the fence.

            Heres another tune that sums up a lot of the worlds problems, and suggests some answers.

            Dick Gaughan from the BBC arts series Specturm in 1982. The audio is a tiny (but annoying) bit out of sync. Sorry, first attempt at converting from VHS. When...


            (tune is a bit folky for this board, but so it goes!!
            I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

            I am not a number, I am a free man.

            Comment

            • vinteuil
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 12937

              #21
              Originally posted by Flosshilde View Post
              I prefer la Marseillaise, both for its sentiments and its tune...
              ... its sentiments? hmm, not sure

              Arise children of the fatherland
              The day of glory has arrived
              Against us tyranny's
              Bloody standard is raised
              Listen to the sound in the fields
              The howling of these fearsome soldiers
              They are coming into our midst
              To cut the throats of your sons and consorts

              To arms citizens Form your battalions
              March, march
              Let impure blood
              Water our furrows


              [But I am of the school that is far less convinced by the French Revolution than many French are... ]

              Comment

              • french frank
                Administrator/Moderator
                • Feb 2007
                • 30458

                #22
                Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
                THe lib dems sing that kind of thing? amazing. pity their ministers seem to be the opposite side of the fence.
                Mais, au contraire, mon frère. It is a policy still very much alive on their side of the Collision, albeit not likely to have an easy run past the other lot.
                It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                Comment

                • MrGongGong
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 18357

                  #23
                  Originally posted by french frank View Post
                  Mais, au contraire, mon frère. It is a policy still very much alive on their side of the Collision, albeit not likely to have an easy run past the other lot.
                  I guess it's likely to go the same way as the other "policy" (you know the one about student finance) forgotten for the opportunity to carry Dave's rugby kit

                  Comment

                  • french frank
                    Administrator/Moderator
                    • Feb 2007
                    • 30458

                    #24
                    Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                    I guess it's likely to go the same way as the other "policy" (you know the one about student finance) forgotten for the opportunity to carry Dave's rugby kit
                    Well, go on then, you do better!
                    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                    Comment

                    • MrGongGong
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 18357

                      #25
                      It was a sad day when it turned out that those that many of us (foolishly it turned out !) thought had a glimmer of integrity decided to abandon that for short term pragmatic reasons. All the "water under the bridge" stuff cuts no ice with many of us, honesty and integrity matter far more than these shallow people think.

                      Comment

                      • french frank
                        Administrator/Moderator
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 30458

                        #26
                        Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                        It was a sad day when it turned out that those that many of us (foolishly it turned out !) thought had a glimmer of integrity decided to abandon that for short term pragmatic reasons. All the "water under the bridge" stuff cuts no ice with many of us, honesty and integrity matter far more than these shallow people think.
                        We've been over it many times; but for me a key factor was that the tuition fee policy was never very high on the LibDems' list of priorities. It was one among many that in all probability would have been shelved in any first parliament, even in the unlikely event that the LibDems had won an outright majority. It was the campaign by the NUS that raised its profile during the election campaign.

                        And, what's more - I don't believe that university tuition fees were high on many people's agenda when they cast their vote either. The post-election anger is at the formation of the coalition with the Tories: if the LibDems had promised free bird seed and then supported a new tax on it, everyone would be equally outraged.
                        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                        Comment

                        • amateur51

                          #27
                          Originally posted by french frank View Post
                          We've been over it many times; but for me a key factor was that the tuition fee policy was never very high on the LibDems' list of priorities. It was one among many that in all probability would have been shelved in any first parliament, even in the unlikely event that the LibDems had won an outright majority. It was the campaign by the NUS that raised its profile during the election campaign.

                          And, what's more - I don't believe that university tuition fees were high on many people's agenda when they cast their vote either. The post-election anger is at the formation of the coalition with the Tories: if the LibDems had promised free bird seed and then supported a new tax on it, everyone would be equally outraged.
                          Outrageously revisionist that, french frank and the free bird seed jibe is unworthy of you.

                          This Daily Telegraph summary of the Lib Dem's 2010 manifesto puts tuition fees as second priority under education



                          And there are many other examples of election stunts like this

                          Nick Clegg branded tuition fees "unfair"and "wrong" during the election campaign. The Deputy Prime Minister is now under immense pressure from student groups as the Browne review is published.

                          Comment

                          • MrGongGong
                            Full Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 18357

                            #28
                            indeed its been gone over many times
                            but the key fact is that Clegg was dishonest
                            they keep trying to distract from that but that's what people are angry about
                            there's no point at all in having policies if you are simply going to abandon them
                            the honest thing to do would have been to stand by that even if that had meant another election
                            honesty and integrity matter

                            Comment

                            • amateur51

                              #29
                              Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                              indeed its been gone over many times
                              but the key fact is that Clegg was dishonest
                              they keep trying to distract from that but that's what people are angry about
                              there's no point at all in having policies if you are simply going to abandon them
                              the honest thing to do would have been to stand by that even if that had meant another election
                              honesty and integrity matter
                              Spot on, MrGG! That would have been the truly honest & democratic thing to do, giving the public time to get its head around what a coalition might mean - certainly nobody voted for a coalition. Cameron may even have tried a minority Tory government first of all, who knows.

                              Comment

                              • french frank
                                Administrator/Moderator
                                • Feb 2007
                                • 30458

                                #30
                                I'll scrap what I was going to say and let the indignation be given its full rein.

                                "There's no point at all in having policies if you are simply going to abandon them." If you were actually in politics instead of merely talking about it you'd think that was an oversimplification.
                                It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X