amateur, many thanks for your observations on this event. Like you I have no real business interfering in the process - but I have a real interest, and I was pleased to find that your observations were not far from my own thoughts, such as they were. We both plumped for Michael D, as did others here, as the obvious choice, and it would indeed be gratifying if the electorate in the Republic confirmed our judgement, and thereby demonstrated their own good sense. If it is any satisfaction to you, my second preference would have been for David Norris who also rises above the ordinary run of political figures, though I'm afraid the electorate does not agree with me there. He has conceded and has congratulated Michael D already. But, on the whole I'm encouraged that there seems to be a desire for the kind of gravitas that emanates from the practical man of learning rather than the street fighter, the commercial traveller or the purveyor of that old time religion, who are all entitled to pitch their tents. I think that the Irish electorate had a difficult choice to make, given their history both ancient and more recent,
and their present economic circumstances. They could have lashed out in anger and frustration, but they seem to have reacted with a thoughtful sense of what kind of Ireland they want to see, and the world to see. It's just a pity that I had no part in it.
and their present economic circumstances. They could have lashed out in anger and frustration, but they seem to have reacted with a thoughtful sense of what kind of Ireland they want to see, and the world to see. It's just a pity that I had no part in it.
Comment