Trouble at t'Proms

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pabmusic
    Full Member
    • May 2011
    • 5537

    Originally posted by Ariosto View Post
    But you miss the point!! They do feel that Israel should not exist. It was imposed on them by Britain who gave in to a lot of Jewish terrorists who were murdering British soldiers. Terrorism was successful.
    I'm a little puzzled. After the war, Britain was refusing to allow mass Jewish immigration to Israel; Britain was distinctly pro-Arab (despite the Balfour declaration). After the British attempt to turn back Exodus (a ship with hundreds of holocaust survivors) the USA threatened to withhold loans to Britain, so Britain referred the whole 'Palestine problem' to the UN, which voted to establish the sate of Israel. Britain abstained in the vote. So Israel was 'imposed' on Palestine by an overwhelming UN vote - significantly not supported by Britain.

    Comment

    • Ariosto

      Originally posted by Pabmusic View Post
      I'm a little puzzled. After the war, Britain was refusing to allow mass Jewish immigration to Israel; Britain was distinctly pro-Arab (despite the Balfour declaration). After the British attempt to turn back Exodus (a ship with hundreds of holocaust survivors) the USA threatened to withhold loans to Britain, so Britain referred the whole 'Palestine problem' to the UN, which voted to establish the sate of Israel. Britain abstained in the vote. So Israel was 'imposed' on Palestine by an overwhelming UN vote - significantly not supported by Britain.
      OK, that may be so, but Britain did give up on Palestine when the terrorists attacked and killed British soldiers. Yes, I could quite believe that we were blackmailed by the yanks.

      "His Majesty's government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country." Balfour.

      Comment

      • Nick Armstrong
        Host
        • Nov 2010
        • 26540

        Originally posted by Anna View Post
        That's exactly how I felt and I do hope, at The Last Night, when traditionally there are lots of flags of different countries that the Israeli flag will appear in great numbers.

        (Now duck with me behind the sofa as the flak begins to fly!)

        Any time, Anna


        "...the isle is full of noises,
        Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
        Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
        Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

        Comment

        • Pabmusic
          Full Member
          • May 2011
          • 5537

          Originally posted by Ariosto View Post
          OK, that may be so, but Britain did give up on Palestine when the terrorists attacked and killed British soldiers. Yes, I could quite believe that we were blackmailed by the yanks.
          Yes, I agree with you entirely now. You can detect a real world-weariness about British foreign policy in this period. I suppose this underlies all the 'withdrawal from Empire' moves of the next 20 years - two world wars had bankrupted us and most subsequent international moves favoured the USA.

          Comment

          • tsuji-giri

            One thing that puzzled me was the reticence of the BBC to tell anyone what was happening; seems a bit perverse when presumably there was an announcer in the hall who could have said a few words.

            Comment

            • Chris Newman
              Late Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 2100

              Originally posted by tsuji-giri View Post
              One thing that puzzled me was the reticence of the BBC to tell anyone what was happening; seems a bit perverse when presumably there was an announcer in the hall who could have said a few words.
              Ah, she was stuck for words. Usually that particular announcer spends her time, on TV, rushing up to celebrities, rudely sticking a mike up their noses and telling them how wonderful they are, when all they want to do is get their breath back from performing. She didn't know whether she was allowed to do it this time to the hecklers. Life was difficult for her without her set script

              Comment

              • aeolium
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 3992

                A good article by Tom Service giving the lie to the LPO management's view that music and politics must never mix. I do hope that pressure on the LPO will force them to rescind the suspensions of the four orchestral players.

                Comment

                • MrGongGong
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 18357

                  Indeed
                  its outrageous that they think that its ok to behave like they have
                  so much for "freedom of speech"
                  (as i've probably said too many times !)
                  it seems to be OK to cite politics when you are talking about Shostakovitch or the Quartet for The End of Time or "saint" Daniel (who is a great musician) etc
                  surely it can't be legal to 'suspend' someone for writing to the newspaper ????

                  Comment

                  • Tony Halstead
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 1717

                    Quoting MrGongGong:
                    "surely it can't be legal to 'suspend' someone for writing to the newspaper???"

                    perhaps one of our lawyer MBs could opine on this question...?

                    Comment

                    • Mahlerei

                      The LPO's stance seems hypocritical in the extreme; they - and every other orchestra in the land -were quite happy to let music and politics mix by refusing to play in apartheid South Africa.

                      Comment

                      • Nick Armstrong
                        Host
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 26540

                        Originally posted by waldhorn View Post
                        Quoting MrGongGong:
                        "surely it can't be legal to 'suspend' someone for writing to the newspaper???"

                        perhaps one of our lawyer MBs could opine on this question...?
                        But if you use the name of your organisation without permission to add weight to your opinion on a highly controversial subject, and thereby drag all your colleagues and the organsation into your public expression of opinion without their say-so, that is a disciplinary matter. It's not just a question of freedom of speech. If anything, it's more about the four individuals' invasion of their colleagues' and organisation's right to remain silent on an issue.
                        "...the isle is full of noises,
                        Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
                        Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
                        Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

                        Comment

                        • MrGongGong
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 18357

                          Originally posted by Caliban View Post
                          But if you use the name of your organisation without permission to add weight to your opinion on a highly controversial subject, and thereby drag all your colleagues and the organsation into your public expression of opinion without their say-so, that is a disciplinary matter. It's nothing to do with freedom of speech. If anything, it's about the four individuals' invasion of their colleagues' and organisation's right to remain silent on an issue.
                          That's nonsense IMV

                          So you are suggesting that it's somehow wrong to disclose who you work for ?
                          Surely you don't think that by saying which orchestra you play for you are implying that they are endorsing everything you say or think ?
                          Having read the letter it seemed clear to me that they were simply saying that they were Orchestral musicians in the same way that they would say where they worked if they were academics , only a paranoid misreading would imply that EVERYONE in the Orchestra agreed with them ?

                          Comment

                          • Nick Armstrong
                            Host
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 26540

                            Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                            That's nonsense IMV
                            Then we take different Vs
                            "...the isle is full of noises,
                            Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
                            Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
                            Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

                            Comment

                            • Chris Newman
                              Late Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 2100

                              Originally posted by Mahlerei View Post
                              The LPO's stance seems hypocritical in the extreme; they - and every other orchestra in the land -were quite happy to let music and politics mix by refusing to play in apartheid South Africa.
                              It seems to be OK if you work in academia as it is regarded as thinking for yourself whilst stating where you work (common sense to most people) but not in the LPO.

                              Comment

                              • aeolium
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 3992

                                Originally posted by Chris Newman View Post
                                It seems to be OK if you work in academia as it is regarded as thinking for yourself whilst stating where you work (common sense to most people) but not in the LPO.
                                And it also seems to be OK if you are a player in the OAE, since two of their musicians signed the same letter and also mentioned the orchestra's name.
                                I'd be surprised if this one doesn't go to Employment Tribunal. In the meantime I'll be giving the LPO a wide berth, and won't be listening to any concerts of theirs on R3.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X