I would hope that the Irani National Orchestra should it come to Britain would be treated with the sort of respect that the IPO as musicians SHOULD have attracted this week. I have never heard the INO but if they are like the Iraqi National Symphony Orchestra whom I have heard on TV they should be given all of our support. After years of oppressive treatment by Saddam's regime the INSO sound like a poor English school orchestra but these now very elderly players tried to keep going, are rebuilding and attract the likes of Yo Yo Ma as soloists.
Trouble at t'Proms
Collapse
X
-
Lateralthinking1
I agree Chris. Much as I hate the idea of music largely being forbidden in a country - my idea of hell on earth - I would respect the musicians for who they were. In other words, I would try not to see them as being wholly analogous with their country's policy on music, whatever the name of the Orchestra or the country's involvement in the music being played.
And while some of the musicians might share the rigid views of their country on music, and others not, I would personally choose to see it as a stepping stone towards greater common sense and humanity. This would be the case whatever mileage the Iranian regime tried to get out of it.
Comment
-
Al R Gando
Originally posted by Lateralthinking1 View PostAnd while some of the musicians might share the rigid views of their country on music, and others not, I would personally choose to see it as a stepping stone towards greater common sense and humanity. This would be the case whatever mileage the Iranian regime tried to get out of it.Last edited by Guest; 03-09-11, 21:44.
Comment
-
BetweenTheStaves
Originally posted by Bryn View PostRe.the pair of you. Still, who was is who commented that "right wing intellectual" was a contradiction in terms.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lateralthinking1 View PostIran bans virtually all music. Should there be a protest to stop the Irani National Orchestra from performing if it is ever permitted to play here on the basis of Iran's policy on music?
I hadn't realised the concept of a protest was such a difficult one to grasp. But there I go again with my grammar school attitudes.
Comment
-
-
but Russian operas just a few years later are about.... bumblebees!
Back to Wikipedia for you, I think.
If you are going to try and be a smart-arse then make sure you get your grammar and punctuation correct. Your second sentence makes no sense even though you may think it twee.Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.
Mark Twain.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mr Pee View PostWell, I'd pretty much worked out that you'd just copied and pasted all that earlier irrelevant info, but I would have thought you'd at least have the basic knowledge to know that the bumblebee makes but a fleeting appearance in "The Tale of Tsar Saltan." So the opera is not- repeat NOT -about bumblebees.
Back to Wikipedia for you, I think.
Indeed. I make no claims to be an intellectual, but I do know gobbledegook when I read it........
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostShouldn't that be "gobbledygook"?
Gobbledegook was the native language of the goblins. It had been described as a harsh, rasping language, which made it sound distinctly inhuman.[1] It was able to be spoken by wizards; Rowland Oakes,[2] Barty Crouch Snr,[3] Dirk Cresswell,[1] and Albus Dumbledore were known to speak the language. Gobbledegook was one of the seventy-two languages in which Miranda Goshawk's Book of Spells was published in.[4] The hamlet of Irondale used to have a name in Gobbledegook when it was founded by goblinsPatriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.
Mark Twain.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BetweenTheStaves View PostIf you are going to try and be a smart-arse then make sure you get your grammar and punctuation correct. Your second sentence makes no sense even though you may think it twee.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mr Pee View Post
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostUsing Google, it would appear that "gobbledygook" is only a little more commonly used in U.K. English than is "gobbledegook". However, the original Maverick spelling, from March 30, 1944, was "gobbledygook".
Comment
-
-
The OED says it can be either gobbledygook or gobbledegook but that gobbledygook is to be preferred as that was how it originated.
Origin: The word gobbledygook was coined in 1944 by Texas lawyer Maury Maverick, who expressed disdain for the "gobbledygook language" of his colleagues. The word was inspired by the turkey, "always gobbledy gobbling and strutting with ludicrous pomposity."
The word was accepted by the Oxford Dictionary after its use was discovered to have been made during the Watergate investigations: "To the ordinary guy, all this is a bunch of gobbledygook. But out of the gobbledygook comes a very clear thing: you can't trust the government; you can't believe what they say, and you can't rely on their judgment."
(H.R. Haldeman, recording made in the Oval Office, June 14, 1971)
The Plain English Campaign, who should know more than anyone about how officialdom abuses and confuses with the English language, has settled upon gobbledygook http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/exampl...generator.html
and that is what I taught for many years.
H.R. Rowlings usage seems to be a literary whim that suited her goblins.
Sorry!! Can't stay to argue. I am off to hear Beethoven's Missa Solemnis which is much more uplifting than all this airy persiflage.
Comment
-
-
scottycelt
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostShouldn't that be "gobbledygook"?
It was solely thanks to him that the mercifully now very rare, bitter war of words that once threatened to rage between amateur51 and my good self over the validity of either 'dabnabbit' or 'dagnabbit' was very quickly nipped in the bud.
However, using the methodology applied in the making of that famous landmark decision, I strongly suspect that Mr Newman may well be proved correct ...
Comment
Comment