Current favourite jokes

[ahinton]

James Brokenshire - a man with a name for himself.

Indeed - as May's would likewise have been had she married someone named Nott and then self-double-barrelled (as one does)...

[ahinton]

http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-...-jeremy-corbyn

"A great murmuring among the elders"? Why not let Sir Mark just get on with his work?

[MrGongGong]

[cloughie]

GG we don't often agree, but that one is absolute cracker! ...and I think even Diane Abbott could get that one right!

[ahinton]

Trouble is that, such is her arrogance, the one on the left (of the picture, that is) would promptly have provided the correct answer to the one on the right (without needing first to call a friend, which is probably just as well, given how few she has these days) and promise to have one issued to her a.s.a.p.

[Dave2002]

Another of my favourites from GM, which may or may not be felt to have some topical significance - "he may look like an idiot, and talk like an idiot, but don't let that fool you. He really is an idiot."

A twisted variant of this, which it seems has a much longer history than I knew about - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test

[MrGongGong]

[pastoralguy]

[QUOTE=MrGongGong;624618][/QUOTE

[ferneyhoughgeliebte]

I've heard that one before.

[Richard Tarleton]

I've heard that one before.

We should probably acknowledge that it's from today's Times.

[MrGongGong]

We should probably acknowledge that it's from today's Times.

That's not where I saw it though

[Bryn]

That's not where I saw it though

Go on! We all know you are really a closet Murdochite.

[Richard Tarleton]

That's not where I saw it though

And it's still ©The Times, wherever you saw it, hence I thought it only polite to mention it

[MrGongGong]

And it's still ©The Times, wherever you saw it, hence I thought it only polite to mention it

You know where Rupert can stick his ©

[Richard Tarleton]

You know where Rupert can stick his ©

© is ©, however you feel about it. You quoted it - if you don't like The Times, don't quote from it. "Rupert" neither writes nor edits the paper - as a passing familiarity with those who do would tell you. I refer you to sentiments expressed in the article which appears under the cartoon, which are indistinguishable from those expressed in Richard Barrett's excellent post on the other thread.