But why change the clocks at all? That's what I can't fathom.
The Clocks Go Back...
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostIndeed.
I should have written: .....favour, if we have to change at all.
I'd actually prefer to stick to BST: lighter evenings safer and more useful.
I must confess, unlike Smittims, I cannot see the benefit of having dawn in summer at 3:30 am.
My personal preference would be for CET the whole year round.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostBut why change the clocks at all? That's what I can't fathom.
In the UK it is possible that shifting the time in the current patterns reduces accidents and saves energy - though this I think has always been open to question.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostThere's a good letter in today's Times pointing out something that I've always noticed: that the change is not symmetric about the winter solstice (7 weeks before but 13 weeks after). The writer advocates starting BST at the end of February (half term for many), which I'd certainly favour.
Personally I would favour two changes, or at least run double summer time, to keep lighter evenings during August.
But you’ll never please everybody.I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
Comment