Originally posted by Sir Velo
View Post
Almost useless facts - UK has smaller land area than Michigan
Collapse
X
-
"I do not approve of anything that tampers with natural ignorance. Ignorance is like a delicate exotic fruit; touch it and the bloom is gone. The whole theory of modern education is radically unsound. Fortunately in England, at any rate, education produces no effect whatsoever. If it did, it would prove a serious danger to the upper classes, and probably lead to acts of violence in Grosvenor Square."
Lady Bracknell The importance of Being Earnest
-
-
Just wondering whether like is being compared with like here. The Michigan land area figure appears to contain its territorial waters which includes large chunks of the Great Lakes. It’s not clear from my brief glance at the wiki table whether the UK figures include those or not. That would make a big difference.
A vast proportion of Michigan is forest : over half , in the UK its around 10 per cent,
Update. The approximate Land area of Michigan ( excluding the Great Lakes )is about 60,000 square miles . Ive derived that by doubling the Michigan Forest area of 30,000 square miles . The US agricultural service says this makes up 50.1 percent of the states land use .
The land area of the UK is 93,000 square miles . I’ve checked from a non wiki source and that excludes territorial waters . These stretch out 12 nautical miles . Adding these substantially increases the UK’s area,
Once we get into terrritorial waters it starts getting very complicated as the Great Lakes are wider than the English Channel. I also don’t want to get into the Economic area arguments.That starts losing you friends rapidly.
Therefore the land mass of Michigan is not greater than the UK.Last edited by Ein Heldenleben; 04-08-22, 08:47.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sir Velo View PostI don't think it every changed did it? It always was bigger than the UK - so no "turns out" about it!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ardcarp View PostSorry to be picky, but surely a 'great lake' entirely within a country counts towards its land area? (I was never any good at Geoggers at school.)bong ching
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by eighthobstruction View Postwhat about Having mountains in a territory increasing surface area....It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
The way this is going reminds me of Haltwhistle's (?spurious) claim to be "the centre of Britain". People with too much time and too little to do have apparently come up with the conclusion that the centre of Britain is actually somewhere in the Forest of Bowland - taking into account the distribution of Britain's land mass, including mountains etc.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Old Grumpy View PostThat rather begs the question, is there such a thing as Mitchigeese?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View PostMy grandparents were all immigrants escaping the Pogroms of the Romanovs. The Yiddish word for crazy person is meshuganah, usually abbreviated as meshugge. My grandparents were all apprehensive about moving to an area filled with Michiganders because they thought they were moving to a loony bin
Comment
-
Comment