Afghan music ban?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • oddoneout
    Full Member
    • Nov 2015
    • 9324

    Afghan music ban?


    I read an earlier article about this and thought how awful to be facing that possibility. It's bad enough to have music creation and performance controlled by the state but to have none at all...
    The difficulties of musicians in this country, faced with covid and Brexit on top of long-running lack of support for the arts, are bad but at least there is still reason to try and overcome them.
  • richardfinegold
    Full Member
    • Sep 2012
    • 7765

    #2
    A world without music is a world without joy

    Comment

    • eighthobstruction
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 6452

      #3
      Originally posted by richardfinegold View Post
      A world without music is a world without joy
      ....Well Richard, De santos and Greg Abbott may yet do this....Gosar has never even heard music I believe....
      bong ching

      Comment

      • pastoralguy
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 7825

        #4
        I don’t think the taliban are too keen on cinema either…

        Comment

        • Dave2002
          Full Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 18052

          #5
          Originally posted by pastoralguy View Post
          I don’t think the taliban are too keen on cinema either…
          Apart from killing people, what are they keen on?

          Perhaps the killings are/were just a means to an end, but what is that? Do they have any serious and long term goals which might be considered worthwhile?

          Do they have a culture which is worth preserving (in their opinion) or do they have views of a trajectory for progress? If so, what?

          Comment

          • eighthobstruction
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 6452

            #6
            ....whatever it was it would be strict tempo....
            bong ching

            Comment

            • Serial_Apologist
              Full Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 37886

              #7
              Originally posted by Dave2002 View Post
              Apart from killing people, what are they keen on?

              Perhaps the killings are/were just a means to an end, but what is that? Do they have any serious and long term goals which might be considered worthwhile?

              Do they have a culture which is worth preserving (in their opinion) or do they have views of a trajectory for progress? If so, what?
              One thing which distinguishes the new radical Islamic movements from previous terrorist campaigns is their objective of making "the next world" the locus of change, to their warped minds for the better. In this they are not that different from many a fundamentalist religious standpoint, apart from their means of disposal. This is what makes them so much more dangerous and unlikely ever to be obliterated than the movements, however misguided they might have been, that were directed to bringing about historical change - in which one was prepared for self-sacrifice in hope of a better hereafter for one's fellow beings - here, on this earth.

              Comment

              • richardfinegold
                Full Member
                • Sep 2012
                • 7765

                #8
                Originally posted by eighthobstruction View Post
                ....Well Richard, De santos and Greg Abbott may yet do this....Gosar has never even heard music I believe....
                Get real

                Comment

                • eighthobstruction
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 6452

                  #9
                  Originally posted by richardfinegold View Post
                  Get real
                  ....Oh I'm very real Richard....very real....what I write isn't always real....but you are not interested ....so, ok....
                  bong ching

                  Comment

                  • ahinton
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 16123

                    #10
                    There have from time to time been similar issues in post-revolutionary Iran...

                    Comment

                    • Frances_iom
                      Full Member
                      • Mar 2007
                      • 2418

                      #11
                      Originally posted by ahinton View Post
                      There have from time to time been similar issues in post-revolutionary Iran...
                      it's always remarkable what people believe can please their god(s) without a shred of evidence - at least the burnt offerings had 'of their own volition' to rise to the heavens where somewhere in outer space the deity resides. But then a god who decrees feminine fashions, has apparently no taste for visual or musical offerings and can conjure virgins at will to reward male followers seems somewhat weird and possibly dislikes half of their supposed creation.

                      Comment

                      • Dave2002
                        Full Member
                        • Dec 2010
                        • 18052

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                        One thing which distinguishes the new radical Islamic movements from previous terrorist campaigns is their objective of making "the next world" the locus of change, to their warped minds for the better. In this they are not that different from many a fundamentalist religious standpoint, apart from their means of disposal. This is what makes them so much more dangerous and unlikely ever to be obliterated than the movements, however misguided they might have been, that were directed to bringing about historical change - in which one was prepared for self-sacrifice in hope of a better hereafter for one's fellow beings - here, on this earth.
                        It's easier for someone to claim beliefs and promulgate those beliefs in order to get others to do the sacrifices than to do them oneself.

                        I am very sceptical that many of those who may claim such beliefs have such strong conviction. It may be that some of those involved in the recent conflicts were expecting or hoping for changes in the here and now - and the future, rather than in a somewhat uncertain afterlife. What is now up for discussion and action is exactly (or even vaguely) what kind of progress those people want.

                        Comment

                        • french frank
                          Administrator/Moderator
                          • Feb 2007
                          • 30537

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Dave2002 View Post
                          It's easier for someone to claim beliefs and promulgate those beliefs in order to get others to do the sacrifices than to do them oneself.

                          I am very sceptical that many of those who may claim such beliefs have such strong conviction..
                          Me too. I'm not sure how much is simply about exerting control. Feed them up with any old rubbish as long as they'll do what advances our cause.
                          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                          Comment

                          • Frances_iom
                            Full Member
                            • Mar 2007
                            • 2418

                            #14
                            IMO religion is for the convenience of the rulers, connivance of the wise and control of the masses. Catch is that early education and control can inbed the desired self control such that coercive control is no longer required - hence the attraction of educating young males to accept such nonsense and especially to deny education to females who otherwise might educate their children.

                            Comment

                            • ahinton
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 16123

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Frances_iom View Post
                              IMO religion is for the convenience of the rulers, connivance of the wise and control of the masses. Catch is that early education and control can inbed the desired self control such that coercive control is no longer required - hence the attraction of educating young males to accept such nonsense and especially to deny education to females who otherwise might educate their children.
                              I do not believe that this is the case in every instance but there can be no denying that there's a lot of it about!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X