Originally posted by jayne lee wilson
View Post
American voices
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by oddoneout View PostWell yes, souls don't always come with bodies, as we see too often in everyday life, but a bit unfair on those bodies which do? I used to wonder why it wasn't "nobody".
"No Man" is all too obviously gender-constrained, but it is of course a very resonant phrase with many occurrences in literature, poetry and history...I think that is another reason why it feels hard to replace.Last edited by jayne lee wilson; 06-01-21, 20:56.
Comment
-
-
Back to R4 - yes I have noticed more American accents over the last two years, and it is slightly annoying.
More annoying is the less/fewer confusion - it's just plain incorrect. Otherwise "Less MP's in parliament talking fewer sense" would be correct.
But most annoying is the mispronunciation of six as sic, which creeps in occasionally, as in "Sic Singers Singing". Might be something to do with sibilance on microphones, or just lazy tongues.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beresford View PostBack to R4 - yes I have noticed more American accents over the last two years, and it is slightly annoying.
More annoying is the less/fewer confusion - it's just plain incorrect. Otherwise "Less MP's in parliament talking fewer sense" would be correct.
But most annoying is the mispronunciation of six as sic, which creeps in occasionally, as in "Sic Singers Singing". Might be something to do with sibilance on microphones, or just lazy tongues.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beresford View PostBack to R4 - yes I have noticed more American accents over the last two years, and it is slightly annoying.
More annoying is the less/fewer confusion - it's just plain incorrect. Otherwise "Less MP's in parliament talking fewer sense" would be correct.
But most annoying is the mispronunciation of six as sic, which creeps in occasionally, as in "Sic Singers Singing". Might be something to do with sibilance on microphones, or just lazy tongues.
As I said above, I became familiar with them early on through TV (you can hardly avoid them now if you watch films or TV series), but I still can't see why they might be more annoying than Scots, Irish, French, Estuary-South or.....?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostBut why should Amercian Accents be annoying[I] per se[/I]? Is it the State of the Union since 2016?
As I said above, I became familiar with them early on through TV (you can hardly avoid them now if you watch films or TV series), but I still can't see why they might be more annoying than Scots, Irish, French, Estuary-South or.....?
There are certain UK regional accents that annoy me ('Scouse' isn't one of them) that I really don't like listening to, but that's hardly the most important issue facing us, is it?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Beresford View PostBack to R4 - yes I have noticed more American accents over the last two years, and it is slightly annoying.
More annoying is the less/fewer confusion - it's just plain incorrect. Otherwise "Less MP's in parliament talking fewer sense" would be correct.
But most annoying is the mispronunciation of six as sic, which creeps in occasionally, as in "Sic Singers Singing". Might be something to do with sibilance on microphones, or just lazy tongues.
I spent decades correcting copy thinking there was a distinction and only discovered the truth when idly googling during the March lockdown.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Heldenleben View PostThe less/fewer distinction is one invented by Victorian grammarians who had little better to do and has no basis in historic English usage....
I spent decades correcting copy thinking there was a distinction and only discovered the truth when idly googling during the March lockdown.
.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostBut why should Amercian Accents be annoying per se? Is it the State of the Union since 2016?It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post.. I agree that it shouldn't be a shibboleth - but it can make for useful distinctions - "fewer intelligent people" isn't quite the same as "less intelligent people"
.
(But shouldn't we really be in Pedants' Paradise?)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostWould they be less annoying if they were all Aussie accents? Or all German accents? Would it be just as annoying or less annoying if there were the same number of overseas accents, each one different?
I still remain mystified at why others seem to, yet seem unable to explain....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostMy very simple point is - I don't find any of these annoying in any context really, not at all....
I conjecture that if there are a number of American or Aussie or Birmingham accents, the fact becomes noticeable and distracting to the extent that one gets to wonder why so many with the same accent (vide the thread title). I concede that some people may not even register that there are, say, 25 different American voices on Radio 4 one week. Not everyone even listens to speech radio very often these days. So for many it is unlikely to be perceived as a problem.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
Comment