And how do I manage to get an hotel room during Proms 2012?
Originally posted by Mr Pee
View Post
This so-called 'once in a lifetime' event has happened twice in a lifetime for anyone over 65.
I'm not opposed to sporting competitions per se - as outlets for patriotic rivalry they are probably better than invading other countries - but to the way in which they are hyped & become grotesquely over-inflated. Staging the Olympics has now become a bigger competition than anything that happens during the event itself, & creates huge disruption - not to mention destruction. All the talk about 'legacy' is just that - there is no evidence that it leads to increased, ongoing, participation in sport, & the claims that athletes' housing can be used subsequently are dubious. A large number of small businesses have been cleared - if they have managed to re-locate the people working in them either have further to travel or lose their jobs; allotments, which people have spent years esablishing as thriving gardens, have been destroyed; and people living near the site have had years of byuilding works with more to come afterwards, when buildings are demolished or altered for new uses, car parks & roads dug up, etc.
Glasgow's winning bid for the 2014 Commonwealth Games was based on the use of existing facilities. I'd like to see Olympic bids made on the same basis in the future. (If a country doesn't have much in the way of existing facilities perhaps there could be an 'Olympic fund' contributed to by other countries to help build facilities.) And, given that the whole country pays for it, perhaps the fiction of an individual city bidding could be dropped, & event spread around the country far more.
Comment