Originally posted by Conchis
View Post
Fun and games with ballot papers
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Richard Barrett View PostThey're saying the same kind of thing now of course. I wonder what gives them the idea that they have the right to decide on other party's leaders. I also wonder why they thought, as they obviously did, that Cameron would make a better prime minister than Brown; it seemed pretty clear in 2010 that he wouldn't,.....
As you say, though, that was a long time ago. We're here and now and in a few days time that X goes in the box. And I'm really, really in a quandary. Despite what some of you may think I am not right of Attila the Hun but more slightly left of centre with a toe in the centre right.
Our constituency is very much Tory. I've usually voted Conservative but won't be this time as I think BoJo is a questionable individual of low morals and integrity.
If Blair was running the Labour party but before his WMD debacle then I might well have been giving Labour a serious thought. But this current lot ? I despair that any rational thinking person can be so blinded to believe the claptrap that they are spouting. And Corbyn is also a questionable individual of low morals and integrity.
I was going to vote LibDem but on principle and much as I would love to see Article 50 revoked, unilaterally revoking it without returning to the country is neither Liberal nor Democrat.
Green ? Well, they are a one-trick pony. IMO climate change is a busted flush. There's nothing we can do. Too many people on this planet. China building more coal-fired plants recently that have totally negated all that the UK has made in reducing our carbon footprint in the last year.
But morally one should vote otherwise all the pain and suffering that those men and women endured all those years ago to ensure that you and I can actually vote would be all to nowt.
Mark the paper 'None of the above' ?Fewer Smart things. More smart people.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Conchis View PostThe Beeb news site headlined the Chief Rabbi’s attack on Corbyn but didn’t give anything like equal prominence to the Muslim Council’s charge of Islamophobia against the Tories.Fewer Smart things. More smart people.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Anastasius View Post
I was going to vote LibDem but on principle and much as I would love to see Article 50 revoked, unilaterally revoking it without returning to the country is neither Liberal nor Democrat.
"vote for us and we will do X" ?
Seems perfectly "democratic" to me?
If they were "undemocratic" they would taking to the streets with pitchforks
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostDo tell. What is "questionable" about him as an "individual" and what evidence di you have of his having "low morals and integrity"?Fewer Smart things. More smart people.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostWhat on earth is "undemocratic" about someone saying
"vote for us and we will do X" ?
Seems perfectly "democratic" to me?
If they were "undemocratic" they would taking to the streets with pitchforksFewer Smart things. More smart people.
Comment
-
-
Andy Freude
Originally posted by Anastasius View PostI was going to vote LibDem but on principle and much as I would love to see Article 50 revoked, unilaterally revoking it without returning to the country is neither Liberal nor Democrat.
The point about the Liberal Democrats 'deciding' who should be the leader of another party was silly. It's a, currently fashionable, quid pro quo. If you want A from 'us', we are demanding for B from 'you' in return. But the decision lies with with you. You can turn down the quid pro quo. 'We' are not deciding, 'you' are.
The tactical vote in my constituency is to vote Labour, which I have already done in spite of misgivings because my strongest motivation is a (sadly fading) hope of thwarting the Conservatives. But to each his own.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anastasius View PostYou're being obtuse. You know damn well what I mean. We had referendum. The country decided to Leave. To put forward a proposal to dismiss that result without going back to the country is undemocratic.
It would be "undemocratic" to say that votes have to be for all time and there is never any chance to vote for something else
and anyway
"the country" didn't "decide to leave" at all
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostHe hangs out with dodgy people ?
I'll just leave this here then
Little (if any) mention has been made of Nicola Sturgeon's veiled and muted olive branch to Corbyn on The Marr Show yesterday regarding the SNP's Scottish Independence referendum, to which, Sturgeon stated, Labour would only have to agree to the basic principle of independence as the precondition of support in the event of a hung parliament. This would surely have been passed through the SNP machine for acceptance. Labour would be disadvantaged in the event of Scotland breaking away. Yet Corbyn has never ruled any possibility of Scots independence out permanently, only said either that it could or should not happen in the first year of office.
The DUP is looking pretty left out of all this - another factor, not just in which way Thursday's vote could go in the province, but for prospects of post-elecoral alliance with the Tories should a repeat of 2017 arise.
Comment
-
-
I thought the LDs had rowed back on their pledge to revoke?
I don’t see what’s wrong with Corbyn as an individual. The worst he could be accused of is some naivety in the past, as regards things he may have said about Hamas.
That is, of course, as nothing to the things Johnson has said and done in the past when he was mayor of London and editor of the Spectator - of which there is written record aplenty.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostThe two primary tasks are IMV
1: To stop Johnson being the prime minister
2: To stop Brexit
I would do whatever you can to make those things happen
I never thought I would see the day when i'm in agreement with Michael Heseltine
Comment
-
Comment