Fun and games with ballot papers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LMcD
    Full Member
    • Sep 2017
    • 8717

    [QUOTE=oddoneout;765341]A bit of light relief perhaps...
    From the Boy John's letters in Norfolk dialect to the Eastern Daily Press, commenting on the February 1950 general election.
    "Well, thas over (the election I mean), an sum on 'em ha got wot they want - an sum hearnt. We dint fare to ha' no time to think about walentines nor yit pancearkes. My hart, that finished up a rumin, dint it? All them wot woted put down a X, that ment a draw - an they werry nigh got it tew, nigher than wot they git them football coupons."
    This is the context
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1950_U...neral_election[/QUOTE
    As a proud son of the county concerned, may I just say that your transliteration (is that the right word?) of Norfolk as she is spoke is spot on - I read it out loud and it was, as Bernard Matthews used to say, 'bootiful'!

    Comment

    • Andy Freude

      Originally posted by Anastasius View Post
      Fact 1 - Jezza said that Labour will plant 2 billion trees by 2040.

      Fact 2 - that is planting 200 trees....every minute...every hour...24 hours a day...every day for the next twenty years.
      I don't think Jezza was undertaking to plant them on his own. How many men (non-gender specific) would be needed over a 20-year period, working a 48-week year for 40 hours a week, assuming they planted 8 trees per hour?

      Comment

      • Richard Tarleton

        Originally posted by Andy Freude View Post
        I don't think Jezza was undertaking to plant them on his own. How many men (non-gender specific) would be needed over a 20-year period, working a 48-week year for 40 hours a week, assuming they planted 8 trees per hour?
        Welcome Andy! In at the deep end.....

        Don't forget preparation, aftercare, as in my #210 above. Transport to site (for remote locations), seasonality, weather (you can't plant trees all year, autumn/winter best)..... Really, string, how long, piece.

        Comment

        • Dave2002
          Full Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 18052

          Originally posted by Andy Freude View Post
          I don't think Jezza was undertaking to plant them on his own. How many men (non-gender specific) would be needed over a 20-year period, working a 48-week year for 40 hours a week, assuming they planted 8 trees per hour?
          130,208 and 1/3 !!!!!

          Comment

          • Andy Freude

            Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View Post
            Welcome Andy! In at the deep end.....

            Don't forget preparation, aftercare, as in my #210 above. Transport to site (for remote locations), seasonality, weather (you can't plant trees all year, autumn/winter best)..... Really, string, how long, piece.
            Hello, Richard. Thanks for the welcome. Yes, many variables, but don't think that 2 bn trees in 20 years is absolutely unachievable as was stated. If it were me I would also commandeer an army of green-minded volunteers. It could be quite fun.

            Comment

            • teamsaint
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 25235

              Originally posted by Anastasius View Post
              My goodness...you really DO think he's the Messiah !
              How you can deduce that from my post is beyond undestanding.

              Anyway, I’m off out to hear some music, so you’ll have to play with the others while I’m gone.
              I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

              I am not a number, I am a free man.

              Comment

              • Richard Tarleton

                Originally posted by Andy Freude View Post
                Hello, Richard. Thanks for the welcome. Yes, many variables, but don't think that 2 bn trees in 20 years is absolutely unachievable as was stated. If it were me I would also commandeer an army of green-minded volunteers. It could be quite fun.
                ...and, of course, supply of suitable species - tree nurseries...will they be able to keep up...

                Comment

                • Richard Tarleton

                  Originally posted by teamsaint View Post

                  Anyway, I’m off out to hear some music, so you’ll have to play with the others while I’m gone.
                  I'm off to the kitchen

                  Comment

                  • teamsaint
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 25235

                    Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View Post
                    I'm off to the kitchen
                    More chicken than Boris, RT ?

                    Interesting thoughts on the trees though, as usual.
                    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

                    I am not a number, I am a free man.

                    Comment

                    • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                      Gone fishin'
                      • Sep 2011
                      • 30163

                      Originally posted by teamsaint View Post
                      Interesting thoughts on the trees though, as usual.
                      [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                      Comment

                      • Joseph K
                        Banned
                        • Oct 2017
                        • 7765

                        This is what India has achieved: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/india...b0fc06ace91e2a

                        Yes, India is bigger than the UK, but it's more people, too...

                        Comment

                        • gradus
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 5633

                          There are also a vast number of trees growing naturally in the wild from the seed of their parent without any help from Man. In gardens too, holly, sycamore, walnut, rowan, hawthorn and various evergreens all set seed in my garden, some of which survive to adulthood by being potted on and given away.

                          Comment

                          • Bryn
                            Banned
                            • Mar 2007
                            • 24688

                            Originally posted by gradus View Post
                            There are also a vast number of trees growing naturally in the wild from the seed of their parent without any help from Man. In gardens too, holly, sycamore, walnut, rowan, hawthorn and various evergreens all set seed in my garden, some of which survive to adulthood by being potted on and given away.
                            Not to mention the myriad birches, principally the silver variety, which lead the 'natural' succession process of arboreal spread. Why not "forestation"? Because, strictly, forests do not need to have trees in them, they just have to be unenclosed 'countryside'.
                            Last edited by Bryn; 29-11-19, 19:39. Reason: Tupo

                            Comment

                            • Richard Tarleton

                              Originally posted by gradus View Post
                              There are also a vast number of trees growing naturally in the wild from the seed of their parent without any help from Man. In gardens too, holly, sycamore, walnut, rowan, hawthorn and various evergreens all set seed in my garden, some of which survive to adulthood by being potted on and given away.
                              Very true. But (for example in the UK uplands, where there ought to be trees but aren't, which is what we're talking about here) you first have to exclude sheep. We're talking on a vast scale. I'm all for it, by the way - along with George Monbiot

                              Comment

                              • Richard Tarleton

                                Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                                Not to mention the myriad birches, principally the silver variety, which lead the 'natural succession process of arboreal spread. Why not "forestation"? Because, strictly, forests do not need to have trees in them, they just have to be unenclosed 'countryside'.
                                Indeed - but unenclosed only as long as you've eliminated grazing herbivores....sheep.... In the wildwood, grazing herbivores (wild cattle, deer, rootling boar) very much part of the system. But it's vast numbers of non-native sheep that have done for the UK countryside. And here we get back to the NFU, who are in the upland sheep-farmer's corner....

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X