Grumble Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • smittims
    Full Member
    • Aug 2022
    • 4429

    If it's bad for sceptics like us., how much worse are the many gullible people being deluded who believe everything they see on the screen?

    I heard a discussion on Radio 4 with an entrepreneur who had developled and marketed a new product. After initial success they found that unauthorised sites were hi-jacking their product, claiming to offer it cheaper,etc.

    I know the internet is very useful. I've come to use it quite a lot. But I still believe it's a mixed blessing and eventually sowthing drastic will have to be done about it , after, of course, TV documentaries asking 'how did we allow it to happen?' .

    Comment

    • Old Grumpy
      Full Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 3666

      Originally posted by smittims View Post
      If it's bad for sceptics like us., how much worse are the many gullible people being deluded who believe everything they see on the screen?

      I heard a discussion on Radio 4 with an entrepreneur who had developled and marketed a new product. After initial success they found that unauthorised sites were hi-jacking their product, claiming to offer it cheaper,etc.

      I know the internet is very useful. I've come to use it quite a lot. But I still believe it's a mixed blessing and eventually sowthing drastic will have to be done about it , after, of course, TV documentaries asking 'how did we allow it to happen?' .
      Ah, but we've got to keep documentary makers (and for that matter PhD students) in business, haven't we?

      Comment

      • teamsaint
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 25235

        Originally posted by smittims View Post
        If it's bad for sceptics like us., how much worse are the many gullible people being deluded who believe everything they see on the screen?

        I heard a discussion on Radio 4 with an entrepreneur who had developled and marketed a new product. After initial success they found that unauthorised sites were hi-jacking their product, claiming to offer it cheaper,etc.

        I know the internet is very useful. I've come to use it quite a lot. But I still believe it's a mixed blessing and eventually sowthing drastic will have to be done about it , after, of course, TV documentaries asking 'how did we allow it to happen?' .
        Interesting. Governments are already “ doing something”. They may not, in the end be things we are happy with.
        it is a jungle to be sure, as local ransomware attacks demonstrate all too well.
        I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.

        I am not a number, I am a free man.

        Comment

        • smittims
          Full Member
          • Aug 2022
          • 4429

          Having heard about 'deep-fakes' today, where someone can (for instance) attach a picture of your face onto a video to make it look as if you're committting some disgusting crime, I'm thinking technology has created a monster. The difficulty is that one doesn't know where in the world the perpetrators are, nor how to tackle them.

          Comment

          • Old Grumpy
            Full Member
            • Jan 2011
            • 3666

            Very worrying indeed, though I presume the police have access to technology to determine whether digital images have been tampered with.

            Comment

            • LMcD
              Full Member
              • Sep 2017
              • 8717

              Originally posted by smittims View Post
              If it's bad for sceptics like us., how much worse are the many gullible people being deluded who believe everything they see on the screen?

              I heard a discussion on Radio 4 with an entrepreneur who had developled and marketed a new product. After initial success they found that unauthorised sites were hi-jacking their product, claiming to offer it cheaper,etc.

              I know the internet is very useful. I've come to use it quite a lot. But I still believe it's a mixed blessing and eventually sowthing drastic will have to be done about it , after, of course, TV documentaries asking 'how did we allow it to happen?' .
              I've long considered the internet to be the ultimate two-edged sword.

              Comment

              • french frank
                Administrator/Moderator
                • Feb 2007
                • 30534

                Originally posted by LMcD View Post

                I've long considered the internet to be the ultimate two-edged sword.
                It's like junk food. The fact that people get addicted to anything is bad for health, mental health, social behaviour, social attitudes. These factors outweigh any possible benefits.
                It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                Comment

                • Serial_Apologist
                  Full Member
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 37882

                  Originally posted by french frank View Post

                  It's like junk food. The fact that people get addicted to anything is bad for health, mental health, social behaviour, social attitudes. These factors outweigh any possible benefits.
                  I think that what I call "user nobbling" has more to do with the government not being particularly concerned about the technology's inability to distinguish harmful from helpful, because a lot of it will be companies using advertising to forage for new customers.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X