Grumble Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • oddoneout
    Full Member
    • Nov 2015
    • 9218

    Originally posted by smittims View Post
    Maybe they claim the old phone system is more expensive to maintain, as they did with the old railway system they wrecked in the 1960s. Was it AJP Taylor who said 'one thing we learn from history is that people never learn from history'?

    In the future there'll be TV documentaries about it, asking 'how did we (alwys 'we' not they) allow it to happen?'
    From the Ofcom link posted earlier
    This network is old, and becoming harder and more expensive to maintain, so it needs to be replaced.
    and
    BT has taken the decision to retire its PSTN by December 2025 and this means other providers that use BT’s network must follow the same timescale.
    and - perhaps the most telling -
    The decision to close the PSTN has been made by industry, not Ofcom or the UK Government.

    Comment

    • oddoneout
      Full Member
      • Nov 2015
      • 9218

      Originally posted by Jonathan View Post
      Talking of phones, routers and internet based calls, aside from the problems with power cuts causing people to be cut off, there's also the problem with call quality. We have VOIP (Voice Over Internet Phones) at work and they are awful! Sometimes the person on the other end of the call sounds more like a Dalek than a human! Why replace a perfectly decent system with something digital all in the way of progress even though it's worse than the original system? Crass stupidity rules again - it's rather like the farcical idea of turning off the FM signal and making everything digital radio based from a few years ago.
      Having had experience both at my former workplace and in the local library, the poor voice quality is something that does worry me, since I have problems understanding speech (auditory perception,not a hearing loss issue) which is made worse by phones at the best of times. Increasingly, as businesses have made the change I have found exchanges very difficult. Having the calls going through a computer rather than a hand/head set certainly makes it worse, especially in a multi-purpose constantly busy space such as the main office at work, where background noise gets added to the already poor sound quality.

      Comment

      • french frank
        Administrator/Moderator
        • Feb 2007
        • 30329

        I don't know what VOIP is, but BT says my digital phone has "HD Voice for excellent sound quality​". Hadn't noticed any improvement.

        Apparently, landlines are set to make a comeback:

        Corded phones are hard to find these days. But for some gen Z diehards, they offer nostalgia and real connection
        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

        Comment

        • Pulcinella
          Host
          • Feb 2014
          • 10968

          Originally posted by french frank View Post
          I don't know what VOIP is, but BT says my digital phone has "HD Voice for excellent sound quality​". Hadn't noticed any improvement.

          Apparently, landlines are set to make a comeback:

          https://www.theguardian.com/lifeands...e-phones-gen-z
          Voice Over Internet Protocol

          Comment

          • french frank
            Administrator/Moderator
            • Feb 2007
            • 30329

            Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post

            Voice Over Internet Protocol
            That's as good as telling me that BLDC stands for Brushless Direct Current motor, or AMOLED is Active Matrix Organic LED (Light-emitting diode?). But what does it mean? Is VOIP what I have with my HD digital handsets or is it something completely different?
            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

            Comment

            • Pulcinella
              Host
              • Feb 2014
              • 10968

              Originally posted by french frank View Post

              That's as good as telling me that BLDC stands for Brushless Direct Current motor, or AMOLED is Active Matrix Organic LED (Light-emitting diode?). But what does it mean? Is VOIP what I have with my HD digital handsets or is it something completely different?
              I'm as much in the dark as you are, but I was advised to activate it on my mobile phone as it would then route calls from home via the internet rather than via the weak regular mobile connection, which keeps breaking up, despite being only a couple of miles from a city centre, where you'd imagine the signal to be strong. How it knows what the person at the other end has as 'their' (sic) protocol, I don't know, but perhaps it doesn't matter!

              Comment

              • Serial_Apologist
                Full Member
                • Dec 2010
                • 37710

                Originally posted by LMcD View Post

                Well, in the case of the switch to DAB+, a cynic might argue that the aim is to increase sales of DAB+ radios. There's a general tendency to think that. because something is technologically possible, its value must be proved by exploiting it for commercial gain while pretending that it's a good thing for society.
                Released on the public before proper tests ensuring safety as much as security had been secured, like Thalidomide.
                Last edited by Serial_Apologist; 16-02-24, 14:17.

                Comment

                • Serial_Apologist
                  Full Member
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 37710

                  Originally posted by french frank View Post
                  Apparently, landlines are set to make a comeback:

                  https://www.theguardian.com/lifeands...e-phones-gen-z
                  Then I may not be alone in hoping so, and not only for the oft-vaunted "freedom of choice" for which our wonderful capitalist system is forever lauded by our impartial broadcasting media. Among the lengthy delays while chat show hosts go through the tedious social media contacts, mention is interminably being made to pure quality audibility from mobile phones, with callers constantly urged to use the additionally much cheaper landline.

                  Comment

                  • oddoneout
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2015
                    • 9218

                    Originally posted by french frank View Post
                    I don't know what VOIP is, but BT says my digital phone has "HD Voice for excellent sound quality​". Hadn't noticed any improvement.

                    Apparently, landlines are set to make a comeback:

                    https://www.theguardian.com/lifeands...e-phones-gen-z
                    I'm not sure that means what you might think. In the UK "landline" still mostly means the copper wire connected system that's being phased out. As far as I can see the article is referring to what we might call handsets - the bit you speak into/dial numbers on, which plugs into a socket. Whether that socket connects to the traditional(soon to be obsolete) copper or to the internet is a separate issue. I have a traditional socket connected to copper, into which I can plug a phone direct if the power goes off *.That proved useful a year or so ago when there was a lengthy cut but I had update messages sent to the phone which I had disconnected from the internet adaptor and plugged in direct, as I am on the utility's priority list(thanks(!) to age). I don't have a smart phone and obviously the computer didn't work so that was helpful for knowing when normal service might resume. The computer gubbins plugs into the same socket via an adaptor. Of course, as things stand, when the change is implemented I will no longer get such messages, as plugging the phone into the socket when the power is off won't work anymore. I don't know for sure at this stage whether the existing phone combo(desk downstairs plus cordless unit upstairs) will work; it should, but that was said about the digibox I had ahead of the TV digital switch and proved to be untrue. It's progress apparently...

                    *I have had for many years a basic £5 Argos phone as standby, dating back to problems in 2 previous houses, and kept when I realised that the new phone needed a power supply to work at all.

                    Comment

                    • LMcD
                      Full Member
                      • Sep 2017
                      • 8490

                      Originally posted by oddoneout View Post

                      I'm not sure that means what you might think. In the UK "landline" still mostly means the copper wire connected system that's being phased out. As far as I can see the article is referring to what we might call handsets - the bit you speak into/dial numbers on, which plugs into a socket. Whether that socket connects to the traditional(soon to be obsolete) copper or to the internet is a separate issue. I have a traditional socket connected to copper, into which I can plug a phone direct if the power goes off *.That proved useful a year or so ago when there was a lengthy cut but I had update messages sent to the phone which I had disconnected from the internet adaptor and plugged in direct, as I am on the utility's priority list(thanks(!) to age). I don't have a smart phone and obviously the computer didn't work so that was helpful for knowing when normal service might resume. The computer gubbins plugs into the same socket via an adaptor. Of course, as things stand, when the change is implemented I will no longer get such messages, as plugging the phone into the socket when the power is off won't work anymore. I don't know for sure at this stage whether the existing phone combo(desk downstairs plus cordless unit upstairs) will work; it should, but that was said about the digibox I had ahead of the TV digital switch and proved to be untrue. It's progress apparently...

                      *I have had for many years a basic £5 Argos phone as standby, dating back to problems in 2 previous houses, and kept when I realised that the new phone needed a power supply to work at all.
                      I was advised to plug something or other into the back of my BT Smart Hub, and the only difference I've noticed is that I now have to include the area code when dialling a local number.

                      Comment

                      • oddoneout
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2015
                        • 9218

                        Originally posted by LMcD View Post

                        I was advised to plug something or other into the back of my BT Smart Hub, and the only difference I've noticed is that I now have to include the area code when dialling a local number.
                        Might have something to do with this?

                        Removing the obligation on telecoms providers to provide local dialling Local dialling lets someone make a call from one landline to another landline in the same area without dialling the area code. We are removing the requirement to provide local dialling on landline phone services since we consider that the value of this facility to phone users has declined and it is more complex to provide on IP networks. We anticipate that telecoms providers are likely to remove this facility as they migrate landline customers to new IP voice services. We have set out our expectations for measures that telecoms providers should take when removing local dialling to mitigate any risk of confusion or harm for their customers.
                        From this https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/asse...-numbering.pdf
                        Reminds me that phoning local numbers used to be cheaper than long distance, now the classification is "geographic" for both and it's all expensive.

                        Comment

                        • Serial_Apologist
                          Full Member
                          • Dec 2010
                          • 37710

                          See what I mean? New technology purely introduced to increase the profits of the suppliers, regardless of inconveniencing the general "consumer". I was just saying this to a lady behind me in the supermarket queue: remember a time when all this self service was brought in to speed up shopping and free up time for other activities? In the end the self-employed small high street retailer was either to turn to selling more expensive "niche products" or go out of business. Hence the oft-mentioned "death of the high street" - by which time the supermarket giants had introduced this and that addendum to slow down what had once been a simple money for goods exchange act, shrunk their work forces, and monopolised pricing at the expense of their farmer providers.

                          No one is claiming some sort of equivalent disaster will automatically befall humankind from the misnamed technological progress, nor are we saying consequences of technological advance need automatically be detrimental. But no one predicted its effects on retail, along with its associated social dislocation when we consider the effects of phone addiction on present and upcoming generations; For new tech to benefit all the necessity for its introduction has to be for purposes of freeing up time for activities other than shopping and working the longer hours deemed inevitable by slimming down labour costs in order to maintain competitive advantage.

                          Comment

                          • Old Grumpy
                            Full Member
                            • Jan 2011
                            • 3619

                            Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post

                            Then I may not be alone in hoping so, and not only for the oft-vaunted "freedom of choice" for which our wonderful capitalist system is forever lauded by our impartial broadcasting media. Among the lengthy delays while chat show hosts go through the tedious social media contacts, mention is interminably being made to pure quality audibility from mobile phones, with callers constantly urged to use the additionally much cheaper landline.
                            The pervasive nature of social media posts in all broadcast programmes is to be regretted - I'm afraid I am just not interested in what so-and-so said.

                            Pure quality audibility sounds ideal, but poor quality is a problem. I suspect part of the problem may be the flat nature of a smartphone which means either the mouth or the ear are not near the microphone/speaker. I'm not sure modern digital landline handsets are any better.

                            Bring back the brick and the dial telephone 📞!

                            Comment

                            • french frank
                              Administrator/Moderator
                              • Feb 2007
                              • 30329

                              Originally posted by Old Grumpy View Post
                              Bring back the brick and the dial telephone 📞!
                              Or the old candlestick handset where you just unhooked the receiver and waited until an operator spoke to you. ("This is Nailsea 193. Can I have Bristol 46xxx, please?") Trunk calls might take rather longer to connect, though. In fact I'm not sure that they didn't have to be booked ...
                              It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                              Comment

                              • Serial_Apologist
                                Full Member
                                • Dec 2010
                                • 37710

                                Originally posted by Old Grumpy View Post

                                The pervasive nature of social media posts in all broadcast programmes is to be regretted - I'm afraid I am just not interested in what so-and-so said.

                                Pure quality audibility sounds ideal, but poor quality is a problem. I suspect part of the problem may be the flat nature of a smartphone which means either the mouth or the ear are not near the microphone/speaker. I'm not sure modern digital landline handsets are any better.

                                Bring back the brick and the dial telephone 📞!
                                Yes, I should have typed "poor" not "pure". Spellcheck can't make up for failing brain power!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X